Комментарии:
I had to pull my previous video as there was an issue with the brightness being set at 2 on the RX 5700 XT System and set to 5 which is default on the Nvidia system. This led to the DLSS 2.0 footage looking washed out. Anyway here is a more accurate comparison, please watch at 4K for best results enjoy
ОтветитьWhere is movement in this comparision? whre is close view 300% ora more ?
ОтветитьWhat is the FPS Difference? why you don't zoom in clearly to see the detail difference? a not a good comparison for me
ОтветитьDlss looks slightly better
ОтветитьFps...
ОтветитьNvidia wins. Fatality
ОтветитьС картинками всё ясно, никакой принципиальной разницы, но где главное, где fps во время движения персонажа?
ОтветитьDLSS leaves a trail on small objects like the floating ash in the distance (they're not supposed to do that). AMD FX does not.
Ответитьyour dedicated streaming pc is way more powerful than my main rig :'(
ОтветитьLooks like Fidelity FX CAS has some work to do to get to DLSS quality. I hope it improves, as I have an RX 6800 otw
ОтветитьMAL
ОтветитьAm I really that unperceptive that I don't see a difference?
All I can distinguish is brightness so far...
In almost every case DLSS 2.0 will look better than FidelityFX CAS, but I have a 1660 super and can't use DLSS so I like use FFXCAS xD
ОтветитьFps?
ОтветитьDo u know what the different ?
DLSS is only provided on RTX, while AMD FidelityFx is there for earlier card.
And what's the conclusion? FidelityFX works as good as DLSS?
ОтветитьNvidia will always look better
ОтветитьThis can be done on the same card, 1080 Ti gets around 100fps, 1440p TAA max settings, with FidelityFX upscale around 140fps. Native looks better to me, the fps is more then sufficient for my needs.
ОтветитьLooks exactly the same
ОтветитьWill it run on nvidea the AMD fidelityx
ОтветитьYou should include some performance numbers too.
Ответитьfanboys nvidia talks lot about DLSS2.0... i don't see difference from FidelityFX.
ОтветитьFidelity FX CAS needs a name change, way too long.
ОтветитьDoes it mean, once AMD fidelityfx cas hits the next gen consoles, the xbox will be superior? What is important for a better performance? Teraflops? Higher cpu clock?
ОтветитьMy 16 threads are sweating playing this in 5K but its still smooth with Ryzen 7 2700X with amd precession boost overdrive enabled but with that said Nvidia DLSS2 is a little bit better so we need a CAS 2
ОтветитьDLSS does appear sharper but both are fairly comparable. I wonder what net % gains each gets though this compared to when running in their 4k native resolutions.
ОтветитьFidelity FX is showing a lot of artifacts, but I am sure they will improve this with time.
ОтветитьIn the shot from the back you can read the words on the yellow section of the backpack with DLSS but not with Fidelity FX
ОтветитьYou gotta do close ups if you're gonna make these comparisons.
ОтветитьThis video would probably be more meaningful if we knew what resolution the games were rendered at and then upscaled to.
ОтветитьI'm AMD fan and DLSS 2.0 does look a liitble better. However with RX6000 and future update on FidelityFX things could be different. Both looks good to me by the way
Ответитьdlss 2.0 much clear and sharp!
ОтветитьFidelity FX is NOT Upscale... juste filter.
Ответитьamd's version actually looks better cause it's not oversharpened and contrast isn't unnatural
ОтветитьYou forgot to include framerates of both with both tech's off vs on as well.
ОтветитьDLSS is much better and provides a performance increase... win win
ОтветитьDLSS IS BETTER
ОтветитьTELL ME ABOUT DA FPS
ОтветитьAMD FidelityFX CAS need improvement. But is nice to know that AMD FidelityFX CAS is near to dlss 2.0. I cant wait for the 6900XT Release this year. I need a new graphic card.
Ответитьdlss is better
ОтветитьIn my experience, DLSS 1.0 looks better than Fidelityfx and doesn't deep fry HDR whitepoint and blackpoint valuse in the process.
Ответитьdlss2.0= fidelityfx NADA DE DIFERENCIA, si acaso el color, muy bien por AMD... que bien lo hara BIG NAVI CARAJO......
Ответитьlol this video is on 5k
ОтветитьThis is meaningless.
Ответитьwhat are the FPS? You should show FPS
ОтветитьI currently have an RTX 2070 but looking forward to the next generation of cards from both AMD and Nvidia.
ОтветитьI just came here to see the fps difference between the fidelityFX and DLSS 2.0. Like how much fps does each of them two add not entirely concerned about the minor quality difference tbh
Ответить