Комментарии:
We all make mistakes in the heat of passion, Jimbo.
ОтветитьThey are russias not Ukraine
ОтветитьUkraine should have said #### that I'm keeping my nukes.
ОтветитьIf we could turn back time to the good old days
ОтветитьThis is not accurate at all lmao
ОтветитьHoi4 reference
ОтветитьThis aged like rotten milk
Ответить"It would guarantee that you'd never be invaded" oh poor Ukranians
ОтветитьAinda Bem que a Rússia Tirou as Armas Atômicas da Ucrânia de Não a Rússia estaria Fodida
ОтветитьAs a hoi4 consumer i enjoy the hoi4 reference
ОтветитьUkraine never had NUKES, URSS had them! Stop lying like that!
URSSR didn't "left on their soil" as US did in Afghanistan, they were still administrated by URSS, or Russia.
This has not aged well
ОтветитьIf only you had made this a year later
ОтветитьWow this moment aged really badly
ОтветитьBet they wish they had them now. Too bad. Why disarming people never helps the disarmed people.
ОтветитьRussia did not TAKE Ukraine nukes, Ukraine unilaterally nuclear disarmed in exchange for solemn vow never to be "special operation -ed" .. Ukraine gambled that widespread friendship is a safer and more practical form of defence than nukes .. If we betray Ukraine today we close humanities door on nuclear disarmament forever.
ОтветитьIn an alternate timeline, Russia never invaded Ukraine because Ukraine insisted on keeping their nukes.
ОтветитьUkrainians hearing "the Ukraine":
ОтветитьI love the hoi4 reference on 2.15
ОтветитьWhat people don’t understand is that nukes are expensive as hell to maintain and I’m sure a newly formed country would be thrilled to have that cost
Ответитьwell that certainly backfired big time
Ответитьwell this aged like milk
ОтветитьStalin might be dead, but his motto lives on:
"This treaty isn't worth the paper it was written on"
Put it simple NEVER trust russia.
ОтветитьThe us is the one that violated the treaty by threating the national security of russia to let it join NATO Support russia 🇷🇺❤️🇪🇬 our brics friend
ОтветитьIf you have a friend or someone you know who's a Russian sympathiser:
Just mention the Budapest memorandum
They received guarantees from Russia, but also obligations, namely that no one from outside interferes in the politics of Ukraine. In 2014, the Western security services directly overthrew the constitutional and legal order of Ukraine on the "Maidan" and since then we have what we have. Simply, if Ukraine had elections, and if the legal government made political decisions behind which the whole nation stands and some kind of system of free elections and unified politics, then we could talk about Russia's direct interference in Ukraine's sovereign decisions. In this way, the Russian entry into Crimea and other areas are equally illegal, as is the organization of the coup by the Western security services and the direct control of whoever takes power illegally in 2014 (remember dear Mrs. Viktorija Nuland), the Russians even have the option to calmly say to the West "you are first started, you were the first to trample on the Budapest agreement". The biggest enigma in the whole story is why the West didn't wait for the elections in May 2014, win them, steal them, whatever, and drag Ukraine to the west? How did the Orange Revolution fail? Most likely because the Ukrainian people, who are supposedly supported by the West, were not particularly in the mood to go in that direction at the time. But it is certainly easier not to deal with these issues, to make stupid platitudes about the then (2014) "democratic overthrow of the Russian dictator without elections" who had a long dictatorial tenure of as much as three years and about the "united desire of Ukrainians to go west" that is thwarted by a madman VVP who dreams of restoring the USSR.
ОтветитьAnd everybody lived happily ever after
ОтветитьAfter Nqto membership Ukraine should begin a nuke program aimed at Russia. Keeping the Russians out of Ukraine permanently
ОтветитьThis video has not aged to well
Ответитьlove the eyes on these lmfao
ОтветитьIt was the worst deal in the history of deals.
ОтветитьBecause they could not sell them to the Africa’s warlords, like the rest of the Soviet hardware? 😂😂😂
ОтветитьThis has simultaneously not aged well and aged extremely well.
ОтветитьWith regards to the ending of the video: "Fun Fact, No".
ОтветитьXibei San Ma's opinion was a vital factor here
ОтветитьGood to know Russia keeps its promises😒
ОтветитьShort answer: surprisingly enough, nukes are expensive.
ОтветитьRemember Ukraine when your Political Leader says to you "Give up your Guns American Citizens".
ОтветитьTo be fair this is why North Korea won't give up its Nukes. Many country's get security guarantees & when they get attacked or Invaded all the "Anti-War" people come out & say "Let's not get involved" & just sit back & let a country lose its Sovereignty.
ОтветитьThanks for the reminder that treaties are literally just words on paper
ОтветитьWhat a good day that was... for Putin.
ОтветитьF***!
ОтветитьWhat a nice ending, I’m glad that the treaty will help protect Ukraine
ОтветитьThis totally aged wonderfully. Ukraine still has the same borders and hasn’t been invaded again to this day😃😃😃
ОтветитьRussia: after all, why shouldn’t we have Ukraine
Ответить