JavaScript Was So Bad They Had To Add A Second Mode To Fix It

how do you make the console tab take all the browser space ?

awesome as always

Thank you so much for this video ☺️

Dart should've replaced JS, atleast with flutter the language has a chance now.

The arguments "array" sometimes comes in handy in varargs functions.

Thank you, Kyle. This helped me immensly.

I have a question, maybe someone can help.

How can you do something like how Date is implentated in js?
You can call it without the new keyword or with the keyword and it does different things. Without it simply returns a String with the Date, with the new Keyword it logically returns an Object, but it acts like some kind of a String, so if you print it, you get the same, but without the ' ' thingies, but it's still an object that contains functions.

So normally if you return an object, you see all the keys of this object and don't get a simple text. So it's some kind of return value, but return doesn't work with a class object. You can assign keys to a function, but this doesn't work with the new keyword. And you can't define a function and a class with the same name. So does someone know, how it can be called with and without new at the same time and how it only prints a kind of String line out as an object?

ty bruu <3

Thank you man for sharing this stuff

if you're using modules you are automatically in strict mode

in classes and js loaded via es modules u don't need use strict, it's active automatically

Worked , thanks a lot!

You can use ESLint to check your code without strict mode

Sloppy 😳

"strict mode" looks more like "relaxed but less stupid mode".

WHY DISABLE LINE NUMBERING? MY BRAIN IS BREAKING!

yeah, working for a company developping ui5 and js apps we always use "strict Mode"

lets be kind, not strict

awesome!

The JavaScript bug I'd love to see fixed is it's very existence.

Thank you for this

That arguments[0] = ...; thingy is quirky as hell!

dude this is so gooood for debuggin and for me that im still learning JS its reaaaaaaaaaally good so i can write better now i feel

Don't be a simp... unless you're a Web Dev Simp ;)

I stopped using strict mode because my code would never work the way I intended it to in strict mode.

Could you do a tutorial on await / promises / observables (more typescript content possibly?) I've found I've needed to rely on manually adding timeouts / waits using the waituntil npm package but was wondering if there was a better way to do this? Just more DB involved content would be nice I guess

Can you make a video on Shadow dom and how can one manipulate CSS in shadow dom

Hi Web Dev Simplified, I truly love your videos, you are the reason why I originally got into web development. You've taught me so much in the past year and a half, and I was wondering if you could make a tutorial on implementing ads into your website. I've been trying for a while now but I can't seem to get it to work.

Javascript as others 'moderns' languages like python, php is, and remain still bad regardless of every effort to improve it.
(like typescript, flow, coffeescript etc).

Este man como le hace para ser tan inteligente

My gosh, JS used to be such a mess 🤣

Why don't you make some tutorials in angular.

The last one is scary ngl

I've always wondered what is the purpose of "use strict" in javascript files, but never had the time to give it enough attention or to goggle what is its purpose. Now with this video everything is clear about "use strict" and I will absolutely use it in my future javascript projects. Thank you so much for this detailed explanation with usage examples.

JavaScript: The Good Parts - is a good read. The behavior of 'this' is one part commented on in that book. Anyone have a timemachine to change this :)

Adding type=“module” in script tag will also use the defer attribute by default

“Are you in sloppy mode?” Depends who’s asking 😏

So strict mode is like you have more stricter teacher.

I've been using the strict mode since... well... 2012ish because of a recommendation from another developer. I've read an article online that argued that later ECMA version has it enabled by default. Now, I'm glad that I still put into my code and didn't listen to the article.

awesome

After seeing this, I'm even more disappointed in that the ECMA guys had the balls to call this BS behavior "features" of the laguage, and treat their readers in a disgustingly condescending way for not thinking that JS is the masterpiece of design they think it is (it's a steaming piece of crap in its design, not to mention that it was left unattended and wasn't improved in over 10 years).

From section "4.3.2 The Strict Variant of ECMAScript" of the official documentation:

"The ECMAScript Language recognizes the possibility that some users of the language may wish to restrict their usage of some FEATURES available in the language. They might do so in the interests of security, to avoid what THEY CONSIDER to be error-prone FEATURES, to get enhanced error checking, or for other reasons of their choosing. In support of this possibility, ECMAScript defines a strict variant of the language."

Awesome video Kyle! When I see one of your videos about a topic I already know, I always learn something new 😃👍👌

Why not use typescript like a normal person?

Or "use typescript"

FFS, just switch to typescript and don't look back.

You deserve dislike for this clickbait :D

Or just use typescript 😅?

how to activate hidden typescript

i see a lot of tricky interview questions here

just use typescript omg

i might love JS, but brah, this is so bad