Комментарии:
So what is with the big rubber raft on the nose at launch? What did they do with it? Leave it in space?
ОтветитьQue bonito inventó es igual al transbordador anterior pero mejor prefiero el anterior naves Enterprise Columbia challenger atlantisdiscovery yendevour 😅
ОтветитьInteresting concept. If it was do-able it would have already been done.
Ответитьgood video good channel may be in the future greetings
Ответить
In the first few seconds I was fooled.
I thought I was watching a real launch.
I was intrigued by the new and non-standard in a launch. Especially for the device. I thought to myself, what an interesting vehicle, and that's when I understood everything.
The first mistake, which doesn't lie, was seeing this rocket rise in great synchronism with the camera. No tripping, and no aiming errors. It was too perfect.
The second clue is the engines. The fire produced by these large engines is enormous and orange in color. Not this one.
As I like to say in those moments — it was too perfect.
Congratulations to the programmers who did this great work.
😂🤡
ОтветитьIt is better before future but speed of light
ОтветитьЯ тоже так рисовать умею!
ОтветитьThis is on the mark of what’s coming
ОтветитьГандольеры стивена кинга. 😜😜😜
ОтветитьХороший мультфильм! 😂😂😂😜😜😜
Ответитьyuke yuke Duke Fleed
tobe tobe Grendizer
daichi to umi to aozora to
tomo to chikatta kono heiwa
mamori mo kataku tachiagare
chikyuu wa konna ni chisai keredo
seigi to paito ne kagayaku hoshi da
mamore mamore mamore
ningen no hoshi minna no chikyuu
Another off shoot of the DC-X.
ОтветитьThey're running out of ideas 😅
ОтветитьThey was do close to producing they even had kid toys back in the 80s. Even gi Joe cartoon had version in the series as if they was promoting it.
Ответить👍👍👍❤❤❤🚀🚀🚀
ОтветитьОпять ёбань графическая.
ОтветитьDefinitely Not Lockheed. Definitely Not Launched In The U.S. ! Go Find This Place "Space Force"; Oh!; You Can't!!!🎉😮
ОтветитьОпять эти нейронные сети!
Ответить😅😅😮😅😮😅😮😅😅😮😊😅😅😅😅well information good show 😅😅
Ответитьэто мультик?
ОтветитьI like the way it doesnt use stages.
ОтветитьSeriously it looks like the shuttle on Avatar
ОтветитьYou'll Never Catch The RazoBack
ОтветитьЛетит клиппер, на клиппере шкипер... А кто гарантировал, что у данного шаттла не прогорит внешний топливный бак, как у "Челленджера", и не отвалятся теплоизоляционные плитки, как у "Колумбии"?
ОтветитьCall me silly but I'd like to lift away from the external tanks, not fall away from them.
ОтветитьLooks like a flying penquin
ОтветитьНасса. Стартывый. Космический. Площадку.
Около. Моря. Строил. Что бы. Страховать. Корабль.
И. Что-то. Инопланетное.
Контакт во. Время. Старта.
Бывает. Рядом. 🇦🇿
Still better than Boeing
ОтветитьGoes to SHOW YOU, you Can't TRUST the Internet 💥😳
Ответитьshuttle but F F F F F A A A A A T T T T T
ОтветитьThe only advantage this has over the shuttle is the lifting body design. Other than that, no power controlled flight. I'm not crazy about where the booster tanks for take off are at (are those reuseable?). How about incorporating 2 engines, 1 for normal take off from a runway, the other to kick it into orbit. We are thinking to far behind.
ОтветитьThe thumbnail: “guys? Guys wait up! Cmon guys”
Ответить噗 胖哥
ОтветитьМультики у вас заебись получаются. Про высадку на луне фильм даже сняли 😂
Ответитьtaylor swift on her way to the superbowl
ОтветитьLove these great
Ответитьbut is it real or is it a cinematic rendering
ОтветитьThat's the unsafest design for a human rated ship, you can bail out with that huge propellant tank all over you.
ОтветитьHow can i believe anythig
ОтветитьПо моему это просто небезопасно
ОтветитьThunderbird 2?
Ответить👍😎🙏🙏
ОтветитьQuem filmou essa merda ?
ОтветитьMa che granda strunzat
ОтветитьYou job at Nasa😂 ❤
ОтветитьGreat work man.
Ответить