Комментарии:
You should compare the Sony A1 50 megapixel, and it would be better than these two with more details mega pixel don’t mean much, sensors type, and of course size matter
ОтветитьОтличный результат для Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, с его маленькой матрицей!
Ответить❤❤❤🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩
ОтветитьHowever, it is essential to consider the general consensus on this matter. Fujifilm's offering boasts significantly larger and superior optics, along with a larger sensor. While a 200-megapixel count may suggest superior image quality, this is not always the case. The image quality improvement is noticeable primarily when comparing cameras with identical setups, differing solely in megapixel count, up to a certain threshold. Beyond this threshold, factors such as sensor size and lens quality become dominant in determining image quality. In scenarios where the limiting factors are either the sensor size or the capabilities of the lens, the megapixel count becomes irrelevant, regardless of whether it is higher or not. However, when the megapixel count stands as the sole limiting factor, it can indeed make a substantial difference in image quality.
ОтветитьSamsung camera got a firmware update which significantly enhanced the details. Would be interesting to do a comparison again
ОтветитьProbably wouldn't hurt to mention that the 30mm gfx glass is $1700...
ОтветитьWow! Run the phone image through AI Topaz. lol. This is so close. Medium Format should be 1000 MP if cellphones are at 200MP
ОтветитьI watched your comparison, as soon as you launched it, and I was shocked by the result, and I really believe that Samsung does not match Fuji, but with the latest updates, Samsung has revealed the feature that is active by default on the s23 Ultra, called "Adaptive Pixel", which forces the final photo quality to be pixel blended at 12MP if the environment is not light enough, even if the final photo appears to be 200MP and a large size, but the resolution quality is the 12MP one.
I'm suspicious that, as the day was a little cloudy, perhaps Samsung has chosen to combine the pixels, taking the photo quality from 200MP to just 12MP, as for example in the photo of the stone in the water.
On my channel, I talk in detail and even show an example of how the Adaptive Pixel feature works, if you want to see it
I found your photo samples so beautiful, and the whole process you used to make the comparison, that I would ask you to repeat the same with the Adaptive Pixel feature OFF on the S23 Ultra, to see if the result was keep it the same.
Thank you very much and congratulations!
I'm just happy with my S22 Ultra and Sony A7c
Ответитьyou wont notice that minor diff for general user in trade off bulky dsllr unless you are very particular in detailed
ОтветитьSansung: taca cor nessa imagem que vai dar bom...
Ответитьyou should add lenses to samsung s23 ultra
ОтветитьI would be interested to see how the lower megapixel setting would look on the S23 ultra given that you can actually shoot in raw with it. I'd imagine the 200 megapixel setting has to do a ton of behind the scenes processing to come out with the quality it does. For a camera on a phone it seems very good considering I don't always want to carry my Canon around with me.
ОтветитьNikon P900 Number 1 in this Planet.
ОтветитьJust physics. The sensor size.
Ответитьpeople will buy camera if the interface and ui is more streamlined like android.
just imagine a7r5 with full functioning android . since sony make both camera and phone.
Great review. I am a photographer, but I am not a reviewer. With that said, I would like to see someone compare the "cooked" jpegs from a pro camera to the top cellphone cameras. I believe that this would be a better comparison because cellphones really, really, cook the images before we see them. Just a thought.
ОтветитьPeople are deceived by "megapixels", they overlook lens quality. Size matters.
Ответить😃👍👍
ОтветитьI found the quality of the cell phone camera is excellent, considering the size. Why there are no company who makes small pocket camera (no cell phone format) using the technology in the current cell phone camera????
Ответитьbigger sensor
Ответитьand people say android is bad meanwhile android can do so much more than what an iPhone can 🤣
Ответитьi love your videos and your location is absolutely amazing
ОтветитьY si se compara con una camara del mismo precio del s23 ultra que pasaría?
Ответитьvideo is where the S23 Ultra shine.
ОтветитьYou forgot to find out that ... was it:
- sensor difference
- lens difference
- focusing system difference
Maybe all, but which one mostly ?
Wish that both were cheaper for me lol
ОтветитьWhen you don't zoom in, the Galaxy S23 is taking nice photos for casual use. I'm a pixel peeper so having a high pixel DSLR is on my wishlist.
Now I wanna compare my Nikon D5300 vs my Samsung Galaxy S20FE.
Camera's are made specially for photos and their macanism dedicated for photos but a phone have too much duties like gaming software handle , camera is a only part of phone even then mobile phones are too close to camera's ❤
ОтветитьIn the end, the best camera is the one you have with you.
Ответитьis that really 200Mp it looks like 12Mp 😮
ОтветитьPlease, compare with google pixel 7 pro. It's more chipper than galaxy, but quality is the same.
ОтветитьIn the most scenarios real life is samsung, but for professional - camera.
ОтветитьS23 is holding great with its way smaller sensor and cheaper lens. You guys have to remember that GFX has a huge medium format sensor and S23's sensor is smaller than a 1inch sensor.
ОтветитьS23 ultra stands to be the best camera phone at the moment.
ОтветитьPixel size isnt everything. Its just a gimmick. A full frame dslr camera with much lower resolution could easily beat that phone.
ОтветитьIphone 13 or 14 pro is detailed. Any comparison to those phones?
ОтветитьNo a huge difference 😎😎 the power of Samsung.
Ответить6000$ DSLR camera comparing with S23 ultra make me think Samsung is a clear winner over other phones!
ОтветитьNext compare the cell phones of each, oh wait the Fuji dont have one.
ОтветитьThe difference lies in the lenses. small lenses are too distorted, convex. Larger lenses are less curved so they can focus on the subject in more detail. As they say that small lenses are like a soap dish.
ОтветитьThe best camera is the one that you have always with you
ОтветитьSamsung anyway very good at this conditions. It so much better than many old dslr cameras.
ОтветитьVery Useful Video. Proves that some people live in their own bubble in relation to their claims about their Samsung phone. Thanks to you
😇
the Fujifilm is sharper
ОтветитьEl test debes hacerlo en la ciudad
ОтветитьTry the Huawei P60 PRO please! There might be a surprise!
ОтветитьWhen you dont zoom in too much, the pictures of the phone looks much bester😂
Ответить