On Cloudboom Echo | Sleek and Fast... And $270 | FULL REVIEW

On Cloudboom Echo | Sleek and Fast... And $270 | FULL REVIEW

Believe in the Run

2 года назад

10,470 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@na-dk9vm
@na-dk9vm - 12.03.2023 19:45

Is this the 3.0 cloudboom or is the cloudboom 3.0 another shoe altogether

Ответить
@coachlevon
@coachlevon - 06.03.2022 00:17

Solid shoe...... it’s fast for those with those who can run fast. 60-65’s in your repeats

Ответить
@laurelizabuff
@laurelizabuff - 08.12.2021 18:13

On runners wear these for marathons! I wonder sometimes if elite runners signed on a contract want a different shoe.

Ответить
@stevestarr9769
@stevestarr9769 - 13.10.2021 20:37

Generally speaking, this shoe is a total miss.

Ответить
@krunoslavcelic453
@krunoslavcelic453 - 06.10.2021 21:29

why the presenter persistently tests only the most expensive models, and sometimes a cheaper model is better, such as asics novablast vs dynablast

Ответить
@chandlerrodriguez7670
@chandlerrodriguez7670 - 05.10.2021 17:21

Really like Brandon’s input

Ответить
@fabiomschneiderkid521
@fabiomschneiderkid521 - 04.10.2021 17:10

bla bla bla. smiles, smiles and smiles, but little to say.

Ответить
@allanlmb37
@allanlmb37 - 03.10.2021 13:54

ON just seems more like a lifestyle brand. A trendy lifestyle brand where it's more about the design, the image and the marketing. But when you get into it not much substance or value for what you are paying. I can only say that I like the designs of their shoes, but I certainly would not buy them for actual running.

Ответить
@normanzielke6108
@normanzielke6108 - 02.10.2021 08:56

You missed an important point durability should be pretty good especially compared to Vaporfly...

Ответить
@erclahill
@erclahill - 02.10.2021 03:14

Brandon said the drop was 9mm with 35 in the heel and 27 in the forefoot (8mm) and the graphics showed 35 in the heel and 24 in the forefoot (11mm). I’m not going to buy it anyway, but is the drop 8, 9, or 11mm?

Ответить
@troyeid8028
@troyeid8028 - 02.10.2021 00:03

Greatest resort shoe in my rotation! Spot-on review: Fun for 10 K for sure. Around mile 10 on hilly roads in Colorado, I was ready for some serious icing. It does invariably scoop up rocks even on asphalt in the High Country.

Ответить
@lindleyberkow5964
@lindleyberkow5964 - 01.10.2021 23:11

It’s poplar with the soccer mom crowd 🤷‍♂️ basically the yeti cooler of shoes

Ответить
@igor6200
@igor6200 - 01.10.2021 22:46

Third place woman at the Berlin Marathon was wearing the Echo Boom, wasn’t she?

Ответить
@alessandrorossi3268
@alessandrorossi3268 - 01.10.2021 21:57

Any tri people who can explain why the tri-community likes On?

Ответить
@i.p2088
@i.p2088 - 01.10.2021 20:47

Brandon.. Don't get angry about the rocks getting stuck.. I have the Cloudflyer and Cloudace. In order to get to the road I have to run in gravel roads.. I have to stop every few minutes to get the rocks out of the outsole.. Impossible to run this way. Regarding the drop. My Cloudflyer says 8 mm drop but feel like 12 +. Also like the Cloudboom eco you land first on the hard cloud tec board and it is just hard.. Amazing quality and durability but more as a backup shoe for me.

Ответить
@steveh5242
@steveh5242 - 01.10.2021 20:41

Imagine paying more for this than the Vaporfly, Endorphin Pro, Adios Pro, RC etc. Insanity.

Ответить
@bpg201
@bpg201 - 01.10.2021 20:28

If it's an On review....it's only a matter of time before the F word shows up.....Firm!!

Ответить
@pj8761
@pj8761 - 01.10.2021 20:19

T: "Is it the best performing racing shoe"? B: "It depends on what your trying to race for". Me: This is the best race shoe if you're racing towards injury and bankruptcy. On cloud continue to somehow simultaneously be the worst feeling, and most expensive running shoes out there. According to the brand on cloud, running on a cloud is painful for your feet and your wallet.

Ответить
@Mochicologo65
@Mochicologo65 - 01.10.2021 19:58

Overpriced and (for me) poorly fitting shoes - a big nope for the brand’s entire line for me

Ответить
@hufemeve
@hufemeve - 01.10.2021 19:56

Yep, just the $270 price tag alone is a big NO

Ответить
@juanseaforth5111
@juanseaforth5111 - 01.10.2021 19:51

First!!

Ответить