Комментарии:
I'd leave it at 1024, add viewport denoising but have it start at sample 16 or 32
Ответитьthankoyu
ОтветитьI dont even have option to chose between gpu and cpu. I do have an rtx 3050 whats wrong?
ОтветитьThaaanx
Ответитьthanks for helping me <3
ОтветитьWhat about game models for animation?
Ответитьman. you are master in this. I didn't suppose to check it like this but now I see...
ОтветитьI had more than 4000 and I waited more than an hour and a half for one picture.
Thank you 😫
Thank you🖤🙏🏼
ОтветитьWow thank you so much you really saved me . At first my render time took about 7 - 8 hours , now its seconds and I'm still happy with the results ... Thank You
ОтветитьBro what frame =? is used in this video
ОтветитьI just waited four hours, and the file corrupted yay
ОтветитьThanks for making this tutorial!!!
Ответитьthx
Ответитьthank you
ОтветитьThe comments here have better info than the video.
ОтветитьAwesome.
Fixed my lag.
Thank you! It is really fast!
ОтветитьThank you! You solved the mystery in 2 minutes!
ОтветитьHonestly I think 10 samples is fine. It works for me.
ОтветитьDo you know if cycles-x rendering is faster or slower than the newest 3.2.2 version? I want to download the version with the faster cycle render time.
ОтветитьWhat’s better for animations?
ОтветитьMa whole life i was rendering 128 with denoize on😢, thank you
Ответить10 samples is super low. For animations typically the lowest I go is 200.
ОтветитьHow much samples would be good for animation
I have made a car animation
Please reply
maybe turn on GPU rendering :) you have it on CPU
Ответитьthanks!! it is so much faster now!
ОтветитьThanks for the tutorial.
ОтветитьOkay, lower sample is better for the performance. Thanks man. BTW, the concept of 'samples', does it have a definate meaning? Say, samples set to 1 means.... what?
Ответитьevery time i try to render with gpu, the render screen show nothing and is grey, anyone know why?
ОтветитьCan someone please explain to me why blender is spending time on empty frames? I literally spent ages reducing the number of frames to less than a half so I can speed up my rendering time. But all that work is just useless because it is just spending time rendering the empty frames anyway? Any suggestion please?
ОтветитьThank you for saving me 21 hours of render time
ОтветитьOMG I'm getting 3 second renders now :D thank you!
ОтветитьThanks from 4 minutes to 10 sec
Ответитьthank you! youre a life saver
Ответитьthanks for the video!
ОтветитьThank you! Very helpful!
ОтветитьPublic Service Announcement. New users please stay away from ANY AMD GPUs for content creation and specially blender. Besides the performance being terrible compared to NVIDIA, AMD does not even support features such as raytracing and will drop support for hardware whenever it feels like.
Buy NVIDIA , besides their hardware being way faster, their software support is WAY better.
Helped a ton. Thank you for making such a brief video.
ОтветитьThanks Man... I was getting Mad for Too much rendering time... You saved 😍
Ответитьyou saved my life 😍😍
Ответить''ola, konnichi wa'', stupid ads🙄 just cuz u can say one word in japanese that doesnt mean you can speak japanese!!!!!🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
ОтветитьThank you so much
Ответитьmy viewport is totally blank in render preview mode...is there any solution plz!
ОтветитьDamn man! Helped a lot. Like comment sub, done ma brother. Thank you
Ответитьgreat tip, thank you 🙏🏻
ОтветитьI notice you've got the render device set to CPU. Do you not have graphics card capable of rendering with Blender?
Ответитьthank you so much worked!
ОтветитьI've been trying to learn Blender with my mac, and it really bothered me when rendering in Cycles. This helps a lot! Thanks!
Ответить