Комментарии:
For more Warcraft 3 Reforged Comparisons and Cinematics check in the video Description / Reforged Playlist!
ОтветитьShould have kept the old icons tho
ОтветитьAmazing video thank you
ОтветитьThe 2003 rendition of lich sent chills the first time I saw it when I did the undead campaign and still strikes an impression compared to the over saturation of armor design of the recent ones and models, less is more as some masters say, I'm studying animation and hope to achieve the same level of design and animation from this masterpiece of a game.
ОтветитьThe old ones actually look better. Despite having lower resolution textures. Seems like it all comes down to the passion behind the designer creating it and not the level of tech involved
Ответитьeven though the graphics became better (which is understandable due to progress of technology).... i feel like that i like original versions more in most of cases. especially i don't like those oversised pauldrons on low tier utits like cultists. they are more appropriate for heroes or high-tier units
Ответитьseems to me they really forgot about readability. maybe that's because my brain is looking for the original icons, but i can't see what the hell are half of the new ones. also the glow on the heroes, the miplaced amount of detail on a damn cultist, the dark cloud of the shade, the helmet on the skeleton that is the surest way to make it not look like a skeleton etc...
so... meh. the old War3 is still perfectly fine to me.
This could have been so much better if they actually took care of the art direction. Nothing in the new models speaks a Warcraft 3 vibe to me at all.
ОтветитьBlizzard got so lazy with the generic Death Knight hero model:
"Hey, lets just take Arthas' model, change NOTHING about it, and give it a different voice set. Done!"
im serious 2002 much better
Ответитьless is more; the originals are far better
ОтветитьThey just copy and pasted undead arthas in skirmish while the old has a new person with a different sword , such lazy blizzard has become
ОтветитьThe new models look good but the animations are meh
ОтветитьRushed game and I was so disappointed tbh when I saw that the cinematics didn't feel like a reforged experience more like an update
Ответитьa big example of : good graphics doesn't make a good game.
The original is just perfect.
Too much goldy ornaments... meh
ОтветитьNew acolytes look terrible btw
ОтветитьThe new graphics and designs are ok but the issue is that their animations are not very active and dont emote the personality of the units like the old wc3 did. a friend let me play wc3 reforged on his pc (i didnt buy it cause i hate blizzard) and noticed how lifeless the world is compared to the old wc3.
ОтветитьI never noticed the acolyte was carrying a dagger lol
ОтветитьUD Arthas = D.K. and Undead Arthas ???
Ответитьsoul vs soulless
Ответитьomg these new ones are so fucking bad
ОтветитьWat utter failure 2020
ОтветитьReforged made me less old and ugly
ОтветитьI dont think anyone can argue the detail that was put into the models is impressive. They do look a lot better, the thing that irritates me the most is the lack of their animations and movement both in game and during in game cut scenes. They just sit there like chess pieces for the most part.
They had such an amazing opportunity to remake one of the greatest RTS's of all time and instead further pissed off an already pissed off fan base.
I have the newest version, but why do I still have the old format/ old characters ?? Do I need to change the settings ?
Ответитьbut i like 2002 warcraft but 2020 better than 2002 sorry my pc reach 2002 warcraft 2002 i can install warcraft 2020 because my pc its low
sorry for my bad english
Still better than Cyberpunk and yet Reforged got more shit on Metacritic despite the fact less people are interested in RTS's those days than open world RPG's like Cyberpunk lmao
Ответитьyou can see the fps drops in the comparison lmao xD
ОтветитьSo they turned a frost wyrm into a frost dragon?
Ответить2002
ОтветитьСейчас таких созданий в играх полно, а вот для 2002 года это выглядело впечатляюще
ОтветитьArthas what are you doing with your horse?🤣👀
ОтветитьCinematics make arthas look half baked but the game is still decent
ОтветитьAll this people hating the game probably never played original game when this game was huge. This graphic improvement is enough for me to play warcraft one more time at least,and I already finish whole campaign more then 15 times at least.... this is bad graphics and minecraft is good?
ОтветитьFault of china
ОтветитьThe sprites are so shabby that i cant think that Blizzard made both, if you look closely to the movement of the Abominations or the Ghouls, you can see the frame where his "movement" resets
Ответить2010 graphics more like
ОтветитьLos antiguos tienen mejores movimientos
Ответитьbruh the new shade looks more visible
Ответить2002 vers. is still great til nowadays
ОтветитьWhy so ugly?
Ответить