Nvidia DLSS 3 vs DLSS OFF [RTX 4090] | Direct Comparison

All great until you want to shoot a target with a rifle 400m off and the AI decides that the target would be better off shown as a smudge.

DLSS is the way NVIDIA lies us 😂

Sounds like ThinMatrix channel

tested dlss using Horizon forbidden west. 2k display. Went from 80 avg to 120 avg. No bugs, hiccups or artifacts so far that I managed to notice.

Imagine what DLSS 4 would give

barely see any difference in quality, yet the difference is fps is huge

Cant see the difference between 80fps and 200

right now for mid range pcs you can get a 4060 for only $15 more than the 3060 12gb what is around $322 (converting from uk to usa currency) personally i think its obvious which one to go for with an extra 20% more performance not to consider the less power consumption yes it only have 8gb but really in most games that doesnt matter

But, I don't see the difference😂

So cyberpunk 4 k with ray tracing only hits 30fps with a 4090? Wow

Sold

So put it simply DLSS its a crap that makes image blurry.

Do the 30 series gpu-s, like my 3060 Ti have DLSS3?

So rasterization is pure trash and dlss is required. Ill wait for 5000 series then. :/

For several weeks Ive been trying to decide which laptop should I take, with 3070ti or 4070. Now, looking at all the artifacts created by DLSS 3.0, I think I've made a final desicion, which is, ofc, the 3070ti, also because its way cheaper

There's one very important difference to DLSS3 that you didn't touch on and it's the real game changer.
Frame Generation is done entirely on the GPU and unlike DLSS2, and previous methods, does not require the CPU and so for games where you'd typically see a CPU bottleneck even though DLSS could have given you more frames, DLSS3 will happily generate the AI frames using only the GPU. This is why we're seeing such massive increases in FPS. The CPU doesn't have to work any harder than it would without DLSS turned on and thus the GPU can take over the work of add the frame. This however does come with 2 downsides. The first being that there's an introduction of input lag because the GPU has to wait for the forward frame to be rendered before it can render the AI frame and second, the AI frames are simply there to smooth out the image and will not respond to use input because. This isn't really noticeable when going from say 60 real frames to 120 including interpolated but imagine if you had 15 real frame and used DLSS3 to double it to 30. The game would still only be responding to your inputs at 15fps and so it would certainly feel laggy.

Wow big improvement

Google or novosy can give me a clear anser. Does dlss increase qualiry or not? If my 4090 is running above 100 fps in 4k native, why turn on dlss? Could someone explain please.

DLSS 3 control the gaming industry programming . no longer hardware war ...

I bought Dying Light 2 on steam for super cheap, and with my 4080 I was getting between 65-90 frames with everything cranked up. But the game was so choppy and blurry in forest areas while moving around even with motion blur off. I had never used DLSS before and decided to try it, It brought the framerate up to 170-180 and its pretty solid there. All of the choppiness and blurriness was gone. The game still looks the same and the only difference I noticed besides the framerate was the render latency went up which is not a big deal.

Nvidia currently has the leading technology when it comes to GPUs. While AMD has become better in terms of performance, they still have some catching up to do to reach Nvidia's level. Nvidia's technology is unmatched, which is why they remain the king of GPUs. As someone who appreciates the power of a good GPU, I really hope that Nvidia continues to produce high-quality GPUs for years to come.

Got rtx4090 soon LG C2 :)
I can't even image how it will look on 4k :D
Diablo4 will be amazing for sure

Excellent

Its just a gimmick

Ahh yes more frames for a graphics card that really doesn't need it.

I'm sceptical. Not of the technology, but that NVIDIA won't artificially handicap non-DLSS 3 capable cards in order to sell new hardware.

i dont know why they dont use sli, imagine if a laptop has 2 4090 each locked at 100w, thats 200w of power, the performence will be phenominal and also the temperature will be so much better

whats the name of the music ???

Just imagine how good the Super Nintendo Switch will perform with dlss4 , especially in handheld mode

thanks for the vid :)

btw since i was just into the 30 series this year (was from 1060) i am wondering so dlss is just a software manipulation which supported by the hardware ? so that means .. Nvidia never has a better GPU power beside the new technology RT ? which not perform very well too without dlss.

dlls make things more blurry in the background they just focus on the foreground render.

DLSS3 is definitly great, just sucks how Nvidia has locked it to RTX 4000 cards, with Nvidias track record of straight up lying i dont believe for a single second that DLSS3 couldnt have worked on RTX 2000 and up.

f nvdia for not releasing thos on 3000 series cards.....GOING TO AMD NOW!!! F U NVDIA!

Bro you deserve million subs 😎🙏

This is the way of nvidia doing it smarter than harder

Do you plan to cover the fact that NVIDA and CDPR used your channel and others to showcase a product that wasn't close to ready to provide to the public. There is still not announcement for CDPR that this will ever be available to the public but your channel along with many others have covered it suggesting to people who where considering purchasing either the card or game that this was either available now or soon would be. This is the same thing which happened with shadow of the tomb raider with the 2080 launch where it was 6 months before they actually released the ray tracking. Why is Nvidia being given a pass to do this a second time around. To be clear I am not trying to be negative about your content I think its great and the fact you where provided with a version of the game with DLSS 3 makes it more then reasonable for you to cover it. My point is more that this was done to set you up to in turn set us all up to believe something that wasn't true. I'm curious if this is something you plan to cover at some point.

Every now and again some new tech comes out which is years ahead of the competition. Well done Nvidia

So basically I'm gonna buy a 4060 and play it with dlss 3 at 1440p thank you for the video

30 fps for 2000$. LMAO

IMPRESSIVE QUALITY DLSS WOW

€2,000 for a graphics card... I'll stay with consoles.

Actually DLSS3 don't reduce imput lag at all on the contrary it increases it a lot

I will get my RTX 4080 soon but im worried that my Ryzen 7 2700X ist not strong enough

That's it im sold. I'm going to get a 4090. I could really use it for 4k video editing anyway, being able to legitimately game at 4k is the cherry on top.

to be fair. DLSS makes the far away edges looks smooth and not broken like its on native 1080 to 1440.... but the overall quality on what close to your camera is looks worse with dlss. checked that on cp77. and ofcource the fps is better tho with dlss

i dont see diff ...

It feels like they're using DLSS fast a crutch