A7S III Honest Review - ALL the GOOD & BAD in 11 min!

A7S III Honest Review - ALL the GOOD & BAD in 11 min!

Max Yuryev

3 года назад

117,653 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

hamimannn
hamimannn - 15.04.2023 11:17

why cant i find 4k at 100 mbs in a7s3 i just found, the lower limit is 200

Ответить
Studio aspirations
Studio aspirations - 25.01.2023 15:58

Short and very informative, thank you very much 🙂

Ответить
AngryTom Tom
AngryTom Tom - 03.02.2022 09:54

Ответить
daslolo
daslolo - 14.11.2021 12:43

"all the good things such as no recording limits" - Sony releases a new firmware update that adds a recording limit.

Ответить
Baiju N
Baiju N - 10.10.2021 18:29

HI Max Does this camera has an OLPfilter built in?

Ответить
karan seth
karan seth - 05.09.2021 14:15

which is best camera for low light?? , better than sonyA7S-3 video quality with low price ??

Ответить
tarussov
tarussov - 18.08.2021 09:12

Amazing review Max. You helped me make my decision with Sony

Ответить
Mark Shirley
Mark Shirley - 13.08.2021 12:13

Max have you got another link to the powerbank - the ones that display dont match the search link you provided.

Ответить
Sunlight Pictures
Sunlight Pictures - 16.06.2021 03:34

Great review!

Ответить
hzubovi1
hzubovi1 - 27.04.2021 11:35

Canon R5 has better in body image stabilization

Ответить
Karthik
Karthik - 27.03.2021 21:51

This video is really detailed well. Thanks a lot ☺️

Ответить
Chris Crouse
Chris Crouse - 10.02.2021 06:38

guy ro

Ответить
Allen Williams
Allen Williams - 25.12.2020 01:36

It isn't perfect? Well, for $3500 it is perfect. You remember digibeta cameras? About $40,000 and that's standard definition! So for $3500 it IS perfect. The canon R5 is over a thousand dollars more and for video its crap. I understand you said it was better than expectations, for me it was exactly what I expected.

Ответить
Steve Cull
Steve Cull - 22.12.2020 03:25

Hey Max, do you think that the Sony E-Mount is limited in size and hence the quality produced by the lenses when compared with the Canon RF-Mount & Nikon Z-Mount?

Ответить
Eric Alvarez
Eric Alvarez - 11.12.2020 12:45

Great stats and times for each frame rate but you did not mention or specify on any of your times what codec and bitrate you used for these tests. Please clarify this so we can better compare with our results, specially with all the different options available. Without knowing that these stats mean little. Thanks

Ответить
Legolas
Legolas - 01.12.2020 19:33

you look like a man who came back from everest.

Ответить
Rani K
Rani K - 30.11.2020 05:37

Hey Max!

Love your videos man, but please try to implement time chapter things into your videos :D

Ответить
Salvador Reynoso
Salvador Reynoso - 16.11.2020 19:15

Great video like always ! So if im mostly using it on 4k 60fps what card do you recommend for the highest quality and cheaper option card? Sandisk, Sony M, or G card? Do the difference in those matter? Thanks man!!

Ответить
Pavi K Pavan
Pavi K Pavan - 10.11.2020 22:18

Is native iso for slog3 is ISO 160???

Ответить
Jackie Wong
Jackie Wong - 23.10.2020 03:53

should I go for the Sony a7 iii? it will take while till Sony a7 4 will come out and the Sony a7 s3 is so expensive

Ответить
Eugenia Loli
Eugenia Loli - 23.10.2020 03:04

Yep, as I've been saying for a lot of time now, but except you, no one has mentioned: people SHOULD NOT be recording 10bit 4:2:2, they should be recording in 10bit 4:2:0. The 4:2:2 requires 20% more bitrate, and in 24p, Sony does NOT give you that extra 20% of bitrate (it's 100mbps no matter what you choose). Because of that, shooting in 4:2:2, you LOSE quality, for something (better chromasampling) that is NOT visible with the human eyes. On top of that, of course, there is no GPU support for 4:2:2. So yeah, it makes zero sense to shoot in 4:2:2 under these circumstances (if we had GPU support, and we had more bitrate, sure, go for it). At least Sony lets you choose between the two, Canon does not.

Ответить
DP
DP - 21.10.2020 17:19

No lcd screen on top. A no brainer for sony to extract more money from you. You have to use a flip screen all the time to monitor readings. No sensor cover like Canon has. Menus too un-user-friendly...Not worth the money for the hastle.

Ответить
Wandering Wolf
Wandering Wolf - 26.09.2020 07:06

Is it weather sealed?? - WW

Ответить
Vidsuals
Vidsuals - 25.09.2020 09:36

All hype.

Ответить
Erwin Zavala
Erwin Zavala - 20.09.2020 11:23

Man it's pretty nice
But can you recommend a great camera with lenses under 2k? Thanks

Ответить
Jimmy Design
Jimmy Design - 20.09.2020 02:09

Sony really went all out on this camera

Ответить
A Cinematic Odyssey of Yesteryear
A Cinematic Odyssey of Yesteryear - 18.09.2020 10:14

Max, are you losing weight?!

Ответить
这就是维多利亚
这就是维多利亚 - 17.09.2020 02:19

Nice review ! but Gopro 9 picked

Ответить
Coffee Scribe
Coffee Scribe - 17.09.2020 01:30

Wonder review. What a nice person. Such good information. Thank you.

Ответить
David Angulo
David Angulo - 11.09.2020 04:28

Does Resolve´s High Light Recovery work with A7siii RAW?

Ответить
DelTheCreator
DelTheCreator - 28.08.2020 19:28

basically an a73 but with better heat resistance and 4k 120+

Ответить
I am on Cloud 9
I am on Cloud 9 - 27.08.2020 18:01

Bad: Overheat? That's really pushing it.

Ответить
Rafael Paz
Rafael Paz - 24.08.2020 13:13

My brain says Sony a7siii, my heart says Panasonic G9, my wallet says Panasonic Gx85

Ответить
TeleV2
TeleV2 - 23.08.2020 06:55

max, will you make a comparison video about 1080p quality versus a7iii? i heard that a7s3 does not have line skipping and pixel binning just downsampled from 4k. As I still use 1080p mainly, i would like yo see the quality. I always thank you for 1080p compasion your video but I can't find any for this time. Love you always :)

Ответить
Phi1eap
Phi1eap - 22.08.2020 21:39

They could add modern rounded corners to those menu icons like all phones does.

Ответить
Wesley Pacheco
Wesley Pacheco - 21.08.2020 21:15

In theory, could you compare Sony's a7S iii 4K 16-bit RAW vs Canon's R5 8K downsampled (4K HQ)? How would affect in color shades? In theory, of course, since I believe there is no recording monitor to manage 16-bit RAW, yet.

Ответить
William Ridenour
William Ridenour - 21.08.2020 05:06

Max. Great review, as always---clear and concise. I just have one question for you: how is the peaking feature now? It's been horrible in the past. Have they improved its look and accuracy. As a manual shooter that's REALLY important to me.

Ответить
Juventin
Juventin - 20.08.2020 13:05

3500$ for this? :)) hahahahaha

Ответить
Xi Le
Xi Le - 17.08.2020 21:36

What's the clock speed of a7S III processor?

Ответить
CC
CC - 17.08.2020 16:45

What I always say about SONY. They are always giving the best for the lowest price. For instance, compare a CANON 1DX mk3 $ 6500 DSLR to this little monster of $3500 IT IS INSANE. I know comparisons of this two are not fair in terms of gear, but just compare VIDEO specs and CANON stills your money like hell. I know I would have to compare CANON R5 which is still more expensive but equal in terms of technologies, BUT this is the last product from SONY giving everything a videographer needs in a small package. Well done by SONY and the market will receive this hit making all prices down.

Ответить
Xi Le
Xi Le - 15.08.2020 05:27

Sony a7s III is a video camera. It's good for capturing motions (cinematography) with no limit of recording time and having some limitations for taking still pictures.
Some mirrorless cameras are photo cameras. They're good for taking still pictures (photography) and having some limitations for capturing motions.

Ответить
Алексей Жарков
Алексей Жарков - 14.08.2020 23:17

why does everyone say that it takes 240fps in 1080p. if on Sony website it is written only 1408 to 804 ?

Ответить
Guaireñito
Guaireñito - 14.08.2020 22:29

I am waiting for their next A7IV with better EVF, better screen, and the new menu system.

Ответить
DP
DP - 14.08.2020 09:59

Good ol sony, like to have readers in their cameras, so you can't use older batteries or third party ones. Nearly 4$£ for a camera body, without a lens..

Ответить
Navi S
Navi S - 13.08.2020 11:58

Move this tech to a stills version -- A7R5?

Ответить
Miguel Cunha
Miguel Cunha - 12.08.2020 14:50

Hello Max!
Thank you for the review.
Sony exceed some of my expectations. In fact only one of the expectations wasn't: 4K DCI internal recording. However, the full sized HDMI port, will allow to output the RAW signal from the camera with a 4264 x 2408 resolution. How can one record this resolution externaly? Is there anything on the market, yet, or will there be?
Thank you again.

Ответить