In-Display Fingerprint Sensor Showdown: Optical vs Ultrasonic!

In-Display Fingerprint Sensor Showdown: Optical vs Ultrasonic!

ben's gadget reviews

5 лет назад

48,846 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

KNZ
KNZ - 04.08.2022 19:59

The Huawei P30 is one of the best phones I've ever used 👏👏👏✅️✅️✅️✅️

Ответить
No Name
No Name - 14.10.2021 00:56

hey bro. why dont you make an update video on this topic. samsung s21's fingerprint is using qualcomm's second generation of ultrasonic fingerprint and im sure that there have been software updates that made the sensors a little bit faster. Would love to watch part 2. Have a nice day!

Ответить
王瑋淵
王瑋淵 - 01.02.2021 12:06

Hi, just wondering what is the brand of your tripod for smartphone ? Looks really nice

Ответить
gilbs72
gilbs72 - 01.02.2021 07:39

Some Samsung phones also use optical scanner. It would be interesting to compare these just to prove optical is really faster even from the same company.

Ответить
Thomas Geis
Thomas Geis - 20.10.2020 14:32

Interesting video. It seems like the optical sensors all require to a) manually wake up the screen first and then b) click the sensor to unlock the screen (2 manual steps). Only the ultrasonic sensor seems to resolve this. Here only one manual step is required (as with a conventional physical fingerprint sensor). Does anybody know which phones besides Samsung have a fingerprint sensor under the screen that responds by one manual step?

Ответить
Agastya 😈
Agastya 😈 - 05.10.2020 18:30

Giveaway karo bhai

Ответить
CQDan La
CQDan La - 16.08.2020 16:37

Was using Note10+ and now a S20+. Samsung's fp sensor is HORRIBLE! Every now and then you press 5 times and it still refused to unlock and I had to use the pattern instead. Last time I will be buying a Samsung phone considering I have been using a Samsung Note phone since Note 2

Ответить
Nila Khatrani
Nila Khatrani - 15.05.2020 12:11

First turn of all animations

Ответить
Bernard Tan
Bernard Tan - 14.05.2020 08:18

Who cares if you are making alot of ugly videos it won't make your face look better or make you taller.

Ответить
Deon Kirk
Deon Kirk - 13.05.2020 06:26

Ultra sonic is 3d while optical is 2d.....the ultra sonic maps the fingers and grooves with sound which is why it's slower ......the optical uses light to match the image on file which is why it's faster.....basically light vs sound....and light is always faster

But tht Samsung screen, build quality, specs, and features destroy everything on the table

Ответить
android by google
android by google - 23.02.2020 23:21

Am I the only one who hates that the optical sensors light up so much in low light low screen brightness conditions? For instance when you're checking your phone in bed? And also I hate the fact that you have to turn on the screen first before the optical sensor works. Please bring back the good old fingerprint sensor in high end phones!

Ответить
MobileDecay
MobileDecay - 13.01.2020 02:02

There's obviously something wrong with your thumbs or something. 😊

Ответить
Preston Z
Preston Z - 28.11.2019 11:10

Just got my note 10+ today and damn the fingerprint sensor is slow. No way near the speed of the old note 9's non in-display sensor. I didn't expect it to be this slower.

Ответить
Y@@ E@@
Y@@ E@@ - 16.11.2019 11:52

the fastest fingerprint scanner is for the xiaomi k20 and k20 pro

Ответить
G Shock Watch fan
G Shock Watch fan - 24.10.2019 23:04

Samsung S10 and A70 scanner is garbage. It is slow.and it fails multiple times. Ultrasound is a disgrace.

Ответить
Marcin
Marcin - 15.10.2019 20:09

Could somebody tell me which one turned out to be better pls? thx

Ответить
Nick Aguirre
Nick Aguirre - 09.10.2019 10:55

Makes me glad I have a OnePlus 7 Pro! OnePlus uses Goodix sensors too! Of course, being owned by Oppo.... Who also owns Vivo.

Ответить
Dilpreet Bisla
Dilpreet Bisla - 29.09.2019 10:19

Wtf you try to lose s10 plus

Ответить
Yuri Review
Yuri Review - 10.09.2019 03:46

Damn Samsung really has to fix this issues

Ответить
Dilpreet Bisla
Dilpreet Bisla - 31.08.2019 16:58

S10 is awesome dude

Ответить
Dilpreet Bisla
Dilpreet Bisla - 31.08.2019 16:12

S10 is awesome dude

Ответить
A J
A J - 23.08.2019 22:08

It was really interesting. I didn't know exactly the differences between the scanners and I wanted to learn. But this test is only to see which one is faster and reliable under certain conditions, but which one is actually more secure? I don't really care about the half a second delay on the samsung phones.

Ответить
Haseeb Chaudhary
Haseeb Chaudhary - 13.08.2019 14:10

U dipshit optical scanners are way worse and insecure...its 2d...idc about speed...but ths 10's scanner is way better and secure...which is more important than speed

Ответить
ejaypisces
ejaypisces - 27.07.2019 07:07

Its bad when u put tempered glass on it...I miss my old traditional fingerprint...!

Ответить
besweeeet2
besweeeet2 - 20.07.2019 07:14

What's the best way to tell how secure they are? Optical sensors are clearly faster, but they could just be letting more touches through with less accuracy...

Ответить
RAHSTYLES
RAHSTYLES - 17.07.2019 17:49

I rather have a faster optical then a slow ass more secure ultra Sonic.

Ответить
Putra Dewata
Putra Dewata - 03.07.2019 09:14

Is it possible to scan without turning on the screen/display first?

Ответить
Dinoo
Dinoo - 27.06.2019 19:40

You are using s10 scanner in wrong way just tap on the screen and u will be amazed by its speed try it.

Ответить
matt fox
matt fox - 17.06.2019 21:57

Works all the time OnePlus 7 pro wet does not work

Ответить
matt fox
matt fox - 17.06.2019 21:57

You have to with Samsung register either with or without a protective cover. I have both OnePlus 7 pro an S10 plus, S10 plus just a split second slower every now and then however S10 always with wet dirty fingers

Ответить
Soumyak Das
Soumyak Das - 15.06.2019 16:48

It seems Samsung is charging too much money for some shitty techs 😂 Chinese phones are getting more perfect! Nice to see that.

Ответить
vvv aggg
vvv aggg - 09.06.2019 07:05

Both Smsung A70 and A50 have the worst scanner. Let me know its a hardware problem or software.

Ответить
William Petri
William Petri - 08.06.2019 23:30

I think you're missing the point about the main difference between optical and ultrasonic fingerprint scanners. The biggest difference isn't the .1 second variation in recognition time, but the exponential increase in security an ultrasonic fingerprint reader provides over the insecure optical variant. This can easily be demonstrated in the example below.

All one needs to spoof an optical fingerprint sensor is your two dimensional fingerprint. This can be found and obtained from literally almost everything you touch, and a 2d mold can be created easily from your discovered print that will trick an optical reader. However, in order to spoof an ultrasonic fingerprint reader, one would need to obtain a 3 dimensional fingerprint - including the depth of fingerprint ridges, location of and depth of sweat pores, even the location, volume, and width of blood capillaries in your finger. Needless to say, this is much, much harder to duplicate.

Ответить
Andrew
Andrew - 27.05.2019 15:09

Does the Lenovo Z6 Pro have NFC? Google Pay support..?

Ответить
credibility63
credibility63 - 18.05.2019 10:49

I have the Huawei mate 20 Pro and the finger print scanner is terrible compared to the mate 10s rear scanner. I just use face unlock now.

Ответить
H Abbas
H Abbas - 16.05.2019 21:29

The main benefit of ultrasonic is that it can work with the display off and it works under intense sunlight. The optical scanner has to be tapped to light up to activate and under direct sunlight it would probably struggle, if it even works.

Ответить
Walter Goldberg
Walter Goldberg - 16.05.2019 06:32

Ultrasonic first time with Xiaomi but not under display. S10 fingerprint is trash

Ответить
Athan R
Athan R - 15.05.2019 07:05

Can't wait for you to nitpick the h*ll out of the oneplus 7 pro..👍

Ответить
Cruz Amatic
Cruz Amatic - 15.05.2019 06:56

so what good are these scanners if you live or work say in a cold area or rugged conditions where you have to wear gloves. Maybe you have those gloves that work with touch screens but is this scanner going to work with people that have to wear gloves?
or are these scanners a fad, over rated?

Ответить
Codvan review
Codvan review - 14.05.2019 07:22

Vivo the first scan in screen

Ответить
Malikthemilkman_
Malikthemilkman_ - 14.05.2019 01:07

The ultrasonic fingerprint sensor is slower on the forever screen, its alot faster when the phone is awake or when the phone is dark

Ответить
G Taurass
G Taurass - 14.05.2019 01:07

One uses light (optical) & the other uses sound(ultrasonic) . ...so pressing your thumb hard against something that literally uses sound or vibrations to map out your thumb print is just counter productive. Light on the other hand will work because all it needs to do is just illuminate your thumb print & you're in.

Ответить
YEAH YEA CHÖUDHURY
YEAH YEA CHÖUDHURY - 13.05.2019 18:02

Vivo X27 Pro is First

Ответить
VerveTech
VerveTech - 13.05.2019 16:18

Somebody should tell this guy that light is faster and penetrates higher than Sound. So definitely the optical is faster but doesn't indicate quality.

Ответить
Anthony
Anthony - 13.05.2019 16:03

Nice video. You should open you your next video speaking your dialect for like one minute... Hopefully it's Mandarin because I can't understand Shanghainese, Cantonese, etc. Lol.

Ответить
xin van
xin van - 13.05.2019 13:53

I saw somebody tested the p30pro's scanner with wet hand,and it worked flawlessly.Can you try it,please?

Ответить
Jacob Baird
Jacob Baird - 12.05.2019 19:25

In my opinion optical is better. I've had the 6t and the s10+. 6t worked almost every time! S10+ almost never works. Idk why they waited so long to use an inferior technology.

Ответить
Tichyz ishh
Tichyz ishh - 12.05.2019 10:50

Great video as always bro. Damn you can almost hear "Americans" scream Chinese tech is a security risk!😂😂 (Forgot to add "no matter how fast they are") 🤣🤣

Ответить
noypi Boy Vlog
noypi Boy Vlog - 12.05.2019 10:13

Original is the best...

Ответить