Комментарии:
When Elon says “free speech”, he just means for himself.
ОтветитьElon Musk interfering in foreign elections is a national security issue
ОтветитьThat's whereyou just got caught out David. At around 4 minutes you said it's not free speech for people who were posting covid disinformation, for them to go after twitter and complain about them limiting their speech. NO David, that IS free speech. You went on to say that those people are actually limiting that corporations free speech. WRONG David. Corporations aren't people. Corporations don't have free speech. Only people have free speech. The problem with our country is that we've allowed these corporations who aren't people, to have rights that would normally only be granted to ACTUAL people. It's good to see the mask slip though, and see what you really think. I'd say it was probably just a slip up, but I doubt it.
ОтветитьMutter is the new twitter. Kidding. But if i made it would they come? 😊
ОтветитьFta
ОтветитьMusk is a total wimp and a free speech fraud
Ответить"Free speech absolutist".
ОтветитьWhat would one expect from an Afrikaner.
ОтветитьTwitter owner and free speech "absolutist"
ОтветитьHow can you be so shortsighted David? You have become so tribal where you can only see from your own tribes talking points. Elon is thinking much deeper and he sees the big picture. You complain when Turkish people are blocked from Twitter for a day, but had Musk not done so, the dictator would have band them forever. Musk works for the greater good and it baffles me how many smart people are absolutely clueless to his rational and practical strategy. Lose the tribalism and it will all make perfect sense.
ОтветитьI have to agree with Elon. Matt Yglesias IS brainless.
ОтветитьTo be fair, despite Musk's obvious obnoxiousness and hypocrisy, Twitter complying with the (albeit authoritarian) laws of a country in which they operate is hardly radical news. In fact, American multi-national corporations not complying with local law (e.g. in jurisdictions which have better consumer protections and business regulations than in the USA, such as the EU) is more of an issue.
ОтветитьI don't know how important it really is, but I wish the media would just stop using twit or writing stories with it prominently featured. If someone of some influence does something dumb on twit, just mention what they said with how much influence. Link to the source, maybe mention it's name ONCE.
Ответить⁉️Yet you can still watch PORN all over Twitter. What a sick world 🌎 we live in these days. 😂 I just finished
busted a good nut a second ago. It was a good one too 👀
One word defines Muskrat's emotional Intelligence, quoting him "titties."
This is the entitled nepo man baby who would "engineer" the world in his image.
Siiiiigh. I've have had to point this out on a couple of channels. If you want to talk about Elons problem with free speech, talk about him censoring AMERICAN journalists. Turkey doesn't really have a tradition of free speech. Plus we don't care about their elections.....
ОтветитьPongo sobre el escritorio dos cosas: musk debe renta en Londres, Nueva York y San Francisco, el no ha pagado la renta al parecer, entonces no puede seguir en la propiedad y esto esta en la ley, es decir alguien que se niega a pagar la renta procede legalmente que lo lanzen, que llegue un camion de mudanza y carga y saque todas las cosas del edificio para desocuparlo y al mismo tiempo procede que embarguen Twitter porque no ha pagado la renta entonces procede que le embarguen Twitter y que se cobren todo el adeudo y por supuesto Procede Formalmente Cargos Contra el porque esta haciendo uso de Twitter como dueño y en realidad no lo es y al mismo tiempo esta Violando Las Leyes Del Gobierno Norteamericano porque Estados Unidos no apoya la promoción de veto y estrategias para Destruir La Democracia es decir, musk esta haciendo esto en territorio Norteamericano y No Procede Legalmente, creo que deben alistar los camiones de carga para peoceder con el embargo y ir a las oficinas y realizar el lanzamiento, es decir, sacar todas sus cosas de los edificios.
ОтветитьSomehow I am not surprised.
ОтветитьMusk truly is disgusting. His double standards would be laughable if only this weren't to such a serious matter.
ОтветитьAmerica has ALWAYS propped up dictators in the name of freeDumb.. What's the purpose of the CIA if not to interfere in elections and destroy labor-friendly leaders?
ОтветитьJust go to Mars already Elon...
Ответить"The Socks Stay On"!!!
ОтветитьIt's almost like he took over Twitter under the pretense of free speech, but only really to have control over what's allowed on the platform.
ОтветитьI am shock that David Pacman actually belives in free speech more than Elon Musk 😯.
ОтветитьElon may just be a partial bionic AI. And could be one of the most powerful geeks in the Galaxy!
ОтветитьMonday Memorial day will be wild and I'll be there with you so let's go
ОтветитьElon Musk is not just a fascist but a danger to democracy across the world!
ОтветитьSo-called is the key phrase in "so-called free speech hero".
ОтветитьSo Elon Skum gobbled up Turkey tweets.
ОтветитьIt is pretty clear Elon is republican and as we all know irony and hypocrisy flows through their veins.
Also, most dictators and governments see civilians as opressable and disposable money makers.
What makes a Man Erdoğan a Dictator? Stop the misinformation we elected him as the Turkish population go bark somewhere else!!!
ОтветитьI said it before, I'll say it again, Elon Musk is the most dangerous man in the world today. No one man should have so much leverage over governments and rulers, he can singlehandedly change the world as we know it, and we are willing to let him.
ОтветитьI said it before, I'll say it again, Elon Musk is the most dangerous man in the world today. No one man should have so much leverage over governments and rulers, he can singlehandedly change the world as we know it, and we are willing to let him.
ОтветитьHe believes he deserves free speach, not us.
ОтветитьPakman shut the hell up
ОтветитьMusk is vile
ОтветитьIf you want to know where someone stands on free speech, let them be in charge of social media for a couple of months to a year. You will see how fast they fold, like Elon. Elon bought Twitter to help procure a base for his "X" program. He is just looking after himself and does not care about free speech.
ОтветитьThis hypocrite dickhead censores a LOT !
ОтветитьYT is doing this day and night !!! Just they name it "community principles" About what community are we speaking Is this a religious one? A political one? (both are the same) They ban You from writing your opinion in the name of freedom of speech??? YES!! The freedom of their speech!!!!!! REt******ded dictators!!
ОтветитьYT AI likes the word F**k just must have many stars on it Yes You can ban me now!!! (AGAIN)
ОтветитьYou’re not pro-free speech neither, David Pakman. You’re a liberal, left-wing propagandist.
Ответитьmy twitter account just got banned for saying that i would "knock someone up" meaning to impregnate on a video someone posted where a woman was talking about wanting to get pregnant.
ОтветитьYou are biased yourself
ОтветитьElon musk does not support free speech
ОтветитьYou can not and you do not know, what Erdogans Gov Reps asked Elon on which accounts have to be censored. So do not pretend to know by generalizing it. The only equation which is true is: wether it's free speech or it's not. But if it is, the there is no censorship at all - none - nul - zero. But then you realze, that someone who calls your mother by her name to be a whore on Madison Ave. is not appropriate to be called "freedom of speech". Or what about calling out on threading or hurting someone? Is that freedom of speech? Where do YOU set the line and where would someone else set it?
ОтветитьBuddy, I agree with you that it’s gross that Elon would censor people at such a critical moment. Next time, avoid the hypocritical comments about “MAGA” demands to uncensor “COVID misinformation” as if they aren’t demanding the same thing you are from Elon. And no, you’re qualifier saying Twitter was in its free speech rights to censor, but that Elon was not doesn’t make sense. Such a contradiction makes it evident that your reporting is slanted. Do better.
ОтветитьRight..ok..so I guess nobody here knows how this works. So what actually happened is Turkish law limited what their people could see, not Twitter. What reason could Elon possibly have for doing this? Please spare me any politics because you may not know this, although Turkey is technically part of NATO, we are not exactly on friendly terms with them for this VERY reason. Please people...educate yourselves and draw informed conclusions..
Ответить