Комментарии:
BRUH THIS SH*TYT^T NEEDS TO BE IN UNREAL 5. LIKE CMON!!
ОтветитьShould be comparing the 2nd frames
Ответить3080ti renders it at 4mins 22secs vs 4090 at 3mins 52secs. guess im skipping 40s series. great video though
Ответить3 minutes felt like 7 days. LoL you have tiktok attention span.
ОтветитьBro isn't subtracting the loading time (which causes the disappointing 4x improvement with 8x GPUs)
ОтветитьFor computation i would use 8 machine with one 4090 in each. You would render 8 frame in 4 min. With one machine and the 8 4090 you only render less than 4 frame in the same timespan. This solution is good for a modeler to see one frame super fast, so for a workstation, but not for computation rendering. So personally i would build 8 cpu+ gpu linked in the network for computation. And one machine with a monitor to work on the scene. You add the price of mb + cpu + memory + powersupply but you render faster. However you don’t need high end components. So it could be cost effective and will beat your configuration for an entire animation. So i bet you can get equal time with only 4 x 4090. In one year with only 2 x 5090ti and with 32GB gddr7 each. So 2 machine with one 5090ti in each should be able to render the same animation of 8 frames.
ОтветитьI have dual cards, rtx and an amd for battery saving etc. is it smart to unselect the slower and card and just leave the Nvidia? Or is it better to leave it enabled and let it take some of the heat?
ОтветитьDamn, dude. Your computer renders Cycles quicker than mine can do Eevee.
Ответитьhow was that 3minutes?
ОтветитьAnd here is me, crying with my gtx1050 😢
ОтветитьAnd it would be even more faster and same quality in optimizing the scene and render settings, especially samples, with a single card...
ОтветитьEIGHT 4090s? What?????????
ОтветитьWhat is your render setup?! Where do you rack the 8x GPUs? I’m trying to make my own
Ответитьwith one videocard takes 4 minute and with 8, 1 minute? This is BS. The decrease in time for the price is worth it only if you render long videos
ОтветитьWould you also try it with 8x + activate the ThreadRipper so that we can rip some threads? Also, how did you fit 8x of them in a box?
ОтветитьCry in rtx2070s
Ответитьlend me one :)
Ответитьhow did you connect so many rtx 4090 together?
Ответитьhow do you connect it with the machine? make a offline video show us the thing like what caiples you need
ОтветитьInteresting that Arnold GPU on the other hand upscales almost proportionaly with SLI, I have around 90% imporvement with an additional card.
ОтветитьYeah, but a 24 frames per second, you are still looking at around 17-20 hours to render one minute of content. Pass. I am moving to UE5 with Lumen and DLSS 3.0 with nigh real time rendering with decent results.
Ответитьand what is the prize of 8 4090? and how much power consume during a day all of them? its worth it really for reducing 3 minutes per frame? i don't think so...
ОтветитьNow I am really waiting for a video with 8 RTX 5090 video cards or 16 RTX 4090 video cards
ОтветитьMy AMD Radeon R7 240 at 2 gigabytes
It's like going up against Thanos with just a stick.
anyone else tryna figure out were he found 8 4090's?
ОтветитьBro😢my 14 second eevee animation rendered for 6 hours
Ответитьmeanwhile me with my GTX 1050TI 💀
ОтветитьIt's slow because multi device isn't properly supported in Blender.
They're doing updates RN to make it work way better
A factor of 8 in hardware cost for a factor of 4 in speed is actually quite disappointing. There seems to be a processing bottleneck. I wonder whether separating those 8 GPUs into two systems and adding the linear space data afterwards could speed this up by another factor of 2?...
ОтветитьLooks like your bottleneck is prep time. If you were rendering an animation, the average frame time would be ridiculous.
ОтветитьHe came back for sience
ОтветитьAny chance you can try this with path tracing in unreal? It is supposed to work with multiple GPUs though I don't know if it can handle 8 at once. Most of the examples show 2 but they don't give a limit.
Ответитьwhy 8 rtx 4090 lol
Ответитьbut it should've been from 4 mins for 1 4090 to 30 sec for 8 4090s. So the system or bandwidth didn't scale well? Typically, multi gpu scale almost close to 80-100% every card added. From what I've seen in older 8 3090 RTX system, it scales close to 80-90%, so there is a diminishing return of about 10%, which is not bad considering its 8 gpus and depends on bandwidth. Most PCI 4.0 speed is enough to support 8 gpus.
ОтветитьMy man had how many 4090 GPUs...?!?!?!
Ответитьhi, i got a question about blender 3.5 cycles rendering , i use 4090 for rendering , but when i render , the gpu seem not working , always use 4% - 7%. do you know how to solve it ? thanks !
ОтветитьI’m confused why 8x the gpu’s doesn’t render 8x faster.
Ответить4 mins and you think it's doom and gloom. I rember upgrading render engines I was building in late 90's just to get the render time for 576p resolution renders "down" to one and half hours in lightwave then rendering frames for months.
ОтветитьYou are a renderfarm 😮
ОтветитьWho can afford 8 4090? 😅 I can't even get one 😂
ОтветитьThis MF has 8 rtx 4090.. 😡
ОтветитьGreat video and thank you for taking the time to give the Molecule Air a test run :)
ОтветитьWhat???? 8 ...... c mon
ОтветитьCue Dr. Malcolm: "he did it... The crazy son-of-a-bitch, he did it..."
Ответить