Комментарии:
Would be interesting to know the bandtwidth on each one....
ОтветитьAm I on the right page, Is this a sample voice for recording for VoIP codec comparison?
ОтветитьG.711 A ile G.711 U arasında ki farkı anlayamıyorum. Belki çok çok az bir farklı" ulaw" daha mı kaliteli bir ses veriyor yoksa bana mı öyle geliyor? Bu arada paylaşım için teşekkür ederim.
Ответитьsounds like old samsung camera
Ответитьaac and opus is original
Ответить👍
ОтветитьYou should do this for faxes, I'd like to see how fax tones get mangled by codecs.
ОтветитьHow many Bandwith did you run on this test? Is same on each codec?
ОтветитьThank you so much. There is no technical data, but I got all what I need!
ОтветитьSuper
ОтветитьNo Codec2? Curious to see how it compares with various settings.
ОтветитьHello sir, I want to ask you what program do you using for encoding to ilbc and amr-wb? I'm using sox and ffmpeg but they only support amr-nb. (os ubuntu 20.04)
ОтветитьNow with disclosed bitrate adding xHE-AAC and Codec2 :D
ОтветитьAwesome, thanks.
ОтветитьThanks . What about G726
ОтветитьVery nice. Thanks
ОтветитьWhich program was used to compare audios in different codecs?
ОтветитьAfter watching this video I just have one question.... Is this a sample for voice codec comparison?
ОтветитьExcellent, thank you very much ! It seems to me that the best audio quality is reached with G722 and Opus. You can definitely tell the difference between G711 and G722, it's amazing how clean and clear the voice sounds with HD !
Ответитьopus codec is good for voip
ОтветитьVery nice. Thank you for that. Mostly use Ulaw and G.722 myself
Ответить