Комментарии:
“ I’ll never put on a life jacket again Chief”
ОтветитьDon't Worry Humans kill more people than Sharks do. You can't even make a case against sharks cause they haven't killed as many people as say drinking and driving or drugs or person-on-person crime that has taken WAY more lives than sharks have in the entire history of man on earth.
Sharks don't have laws only humans do so don't go into their territory they have been on this planet WAY longer than any human ever has been. The shark's territory is 75% of the world and humans 25% so who is in the wrong? They are the top of the top and live by what they know, don't go and mess with them they won't mess with you.
Why should the bloody shark get driven out of the area
And sea where it lives and knows,fucking people make me sick they really do,poor thing would have wondered what the hell was happening to him/her.they have to live in the water we don't have to be there at all so don't go in the water for your enjoyment they have to survive in there we don't
this is actually why i think we should try draining the oceans and sending the watch to space bc then we got no tsunamis and what not
Ответитьid rather be attcked by 5 grizzles than a 5ft great white, i have a better chance against those grizzles
Ответитьhow many great whites would it take to take out a prime conner mcgregor.
Ответитьimagine a shark trying to fuck with a man in his prime that shark would be fucked thats why they pick kids eldery and women
Ответитьi feel like only a girl can be taken by a little bitch shark. men in their prime can kill sharks with their bare hands and thats a fact
Ответитьlol baloney 600 million years
Ответить“Climate change” is bs!! They are sharks they hunt and eat!!
Ответить😮😮
ОтветитьI am a long time western cape SAfrica surfer. Whites are often spotted at certain spots. But the Bull Sharks up in the Easter cape in warmer wters seem to be the most aggressive. Pitbulls of the sea
ОтветитьI find it crazy how people that surf,open water swim,scuba dive etc etc still continue after having a weird feeling. The gut is rarely wrong in my experience.
ОтветитьI'm not understanding what that Danika woman is trying to accomplish. I understand she loves sharks but her 'theyre just misunderstood ' attitude I think definitely encourages people to get close and not fear them. People should absolutely be afraid of sharks and claiming otherwise encourages super dangerous encounters
ОтветитьSwitched off as soon as I heard 'climate change'
ОтветитьI'm 4 mins in, I think I know why!!!! We have fished the fuck out the oceans and taken too much so now we are higher up the menu. :)
ОтветитьIt can’t be stopped, it can’t be prevented… ummmm yes it can! Stay out of the ocean and swim in a pool!
ОтветитьYou play with feathers you get your arse tickled....
ОтветитьOne person in video said that sharks been around for 600 million yrs, I’m sure he knows that because he was there, or maybe his great great great great great grandfather was there and told him about them. Here’s some advice take or leave I don’t care, believing in evolution is denying God has the creator and that can get you sent to hell. In bible there’s a prophecy that was said over 2500 yrs ago about the Euphrates River drying up, well it’s almost bone dry, I suggest that you research it from a Christian perspective not a secular view, hopefully I’ll see some of you in heaven
ОтветитьWhat’s a documentary without throwing in climate change
ОтветитьThis is why I don't swim in natural bodies of water...too many huge predators & humans are made of meat...
ОтветитьI'm not sure how any one shark attack wouldn't qualify for the registry. Maybe the definition of attack is the crucial element if it means that not all attacks result in bloodshed. I never knew that the frequency of shark attacks in Australia had increased so dramatically. Many of these surfers suffered from such severe injuries, and yet they're right back out into the waves as soon as they're recovered!
They are quite amazing in their love of surfing.
Sounds like climate change is the cause of everything these days.
ОтветитьSO WHAT YOUR TELLING ME A SHARK KILLED A MAN AND THE BODY WAS GONE, SO THEY WENT BACK IN THE WATER TO HOLD A TRIBUTE TO HIM IN THE SAME PLACE, AND THE SECOND GUY WHO WAS ATTACKED KNEW SHARKS WERE GOING TO BE AROUND, AND HAD A BAD FEELING WHEN HE WAS IN THE WATER, NOW YOU TELL ME THEY ARE NOT MAD, AND THEYRE ARE PEOPLE WHO HAVE LOST ARMS AND LEGS, AND STILL GO BACK IN THE WATER IN THE SAME PLACE THEY HAVE BEEN ATTACKED, NOW YOU TELL ME THEYRE NOT MAD, IM SORRY BUT THEY ARE, AND THE CRAZY PART IS THEY ARE THE NEXT ON THE NEWS BULLETIN THAT HAVE BEEN KILLED.
ОтветитьNever kayak with crocs, never swim in the oceans with sharks and never camp in grizzly territory. It’s that simple folks. You do these things you’re inviting them to dinner.
ОтветитьFunny how everyone has a funny feeling but still choose to go in 👏
ОтветитьIt is their home. People risk going to where sharks live.
ОтветитьSharks don’t get a bad rap, they’re very dangerous if you go into their environment
ОтветитьClimate change??? 🙄🙄 How about due to the sharks being so protected that they have now overpopulated??? Makes a lot more sense!
ОтветитьI'm a 70 year old Grandma from the US. I don't know how I'm going to die, but I know how I'm not going to die. It won't be from a shark bite😊
ОтветитьAll animals, sea life, etc. are in survival mode. Stay out of the water!
Deep sea life, which are very large, are rising up because of a problem in the deep sea.
Omg that road on the side of the cliff towards the end of the video was crazy!
ОтветитьDon't people know,, NOT TO GO IN THE WATER I. THE. MORNING AND IN THE EVENINGS!!
WTF
There is a compelling case for establishing size thresholds for potentially dangerous shark species. When certain shark species, known to pose a threat to humans, reach a size of around 6 feet or more, there's a legitimate argument for considering their controlled management. Smaller sharks of these species can still sustain their populations, and there are numerous non-threatening shark species that can naturally fulfill the ecological roles currently played by great white, bull, or tiger sharks--- those dangerous to humans predators
It's important to acknowledge that conservation efforts should be based on scientific research rather than alarmism. While some well-intentioned individuals may be overly enthusiastic about preserving all sharks, we must strike a balance that prioritizes both human safety and ecosystem health. Preventable tragedies involving shark attacks should be minimized, as the size of shark populations increases, leading them to potentially seek more sources of food, including humans. SAY NO TO LARGE OR HUGE SHARKS , ONLY SMALLER ONES OF DANGEROUSE KIND SHOULD BE AROUND .
Can any environmentalist explain to all of us why we need large or huge sharks of dangerous species , why having those sharks longer than 6 feet is necessary at all . just like eliminating rats or mice is logical it is same logic when it comes to large or huge sharks when they pose danger to humans they should be removed from oceans . One preventable human death is to much .
Just blame global warming
ОтветитьI can’t imagine the agony you’d be in after being bitten in the shin by a shark.
ОтветитьOle Will is not the sharpest knife in the drawer! 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
ОтветитьThere NOT killer shark's
There just sharks
Leave the pore fuckers alone 😢
Give me a break. We get bit by sharks because we swim in their habitat.
ОтветитьSurfing sounds fine, with explosive-tipped, gatling spear gun and samurai sword back-up weapon.
ОтветитьKiller whales and maybe that's why some of the sharks attacking more people because killer whales will too but not as aggressive as up other sharks safer territory
ОтветитьKiller well
ОтветитьWell, it's their world! We live on land they live in the sea and have done for millennia. End of.
ОтветитьHas nothing to do with climate change. We need to be able to hunt sharks much more aggressively. They live on earth an we control earth.
ОтветитьWhen it comes to shark attacks, it's crucial to confront the harsh reality. Green organizations are spreading misinformation that we cannot ignore. In 1945, the USS Indianapolis, a Navy ship, tragically sunk, and hundreds of sailors met a gruesome fate as they were consumed by sharks day after day. These were not cases of mistaken identity; sharks were actively preying on humans.
More recently, in Australia, a horrifying incident unfolded when a shark brutally attacked Simon Nellis, tearing him apart piece by piece. We must put an end to this misinformation and acknowledge the undeniable truth: sharks do feed on people.
The consequences of an increasing shark population, due to the cessation of shark hunting and the growing number of people swimming and surfing in our oceans, are evident. Basic mathematics comes into play, and more people will inevitably fall victim to shark encounters or be left injured. Not long ago, we had a young boy injured by a shark right here in LOOE Key. As the shark population swells, these predators will struggle to find their usual sources of food, forcing them to become more opportunistic, including targeting humans. We'll witness a horrifying specialization among sharks – some will start specializing in hunting humans.
Any individual opposing shark hunting will bear a share of the responsibility for these tragic deaths and injuries.
To address this issue, we should consider a controlled approach. Any shark species over 5 feet in length that attacks humans should be eliminated, and their meat can be put to practical use as a resource for food or fertilizer. This approach will help maintain a shark population that poses no threat to humans.
Killing great whites, bull sharks, tiger sharks, and other aggressive species is not about harming the environment. There are hundreds of other shark species perfectly capable of filling the roles of these large predators. We must resist perpetuating the misleading information propagated by the environmental industry, which profits from the well-intentioned but gullible individuals who donate money.
Remember, Earth belongs to humanity, and this includes our oceans. We possess the ability to shape and steward our planet, creating a balanced environment – a process known as terraforming. It's time to reintroduce shark hunting, perhaps by organizing shark fishing tournaments for oversized large sharks. Sharks that target humans serve no ecological purpose. Hunting them instills fear of humans in these predators, acting as an additional deterrent that benefits both sharks and humans. Environmentalists, here is a role for you to play: Use modern technologies and employ tracking devices on large sharks to alert and relocate humans from their path before any attacks occur.
Let's take decisive action and discard the nonsensical notion that oceans belong solely to sharks, and that shark attacks are very rare. Even a single human death or injury is one too many.
The wife was probably like "you F-in Disney bigger I told you so"
ОтветитьStart hunting sharks again - install machine gun on helicopter , start patrolling areas where people swim and get rid off sharks big enough to attack humans . sharks are useless anyway . hunting sharks instills fear of humans in sharks and that is also additional deterrent hunt sharks like decades ago it saved people and got rid off shark overpopulation . it is logical solution That's how it is done-
Great whites, bull sharks, and tiger sharks are not essential components of the environment. There are hundreds of other shark species capable of fulfilling the roles of these large predators. It's important to avoid perpetuating misleading information promoted by the environmental industry, which profits from well-intentioned but gullible individuals. Earth belongs to humanity, and this includes our oceans. We have the ability to shape and steward our planet, creating a balanced environment. IT IS CALLED TERRAFORMING ,
Climate change 🥱
ОтветитьMy deepest sympathy to the victims of the shark attack...But Humans are more dangerous to sharks..they don't hunt humans...they are the ones who are being hunted by humans for personal interest.
Humans are the ones who enter their natural habitats...they don't go to land and hunt humans..but humans hut sharks for fins..
Western Australia is brutal
Ответить