Комментарии:
Thanks for including the X100 Ultra, you're probably the first one here who did that. However, I believe you should have used the ZEISS Vivid mode as it would bring brighter images. Using it for nearly 4 months already, and this phone is 🔥
ОтветитьNice video, thanx
ОтветитьAll 3 phones are on the same level. So the camera is no longer the reason to choose one or the other device. Rather, it is the software, the update frequency and the maybe the new Ai Features which usually influence the decision.
ОтветитьSelfie camera n video is onr of the best
ОтветитьSamsung wins in every situation than others
ОтветитьI love vivo...but plz don't compare sir...coz it's not going global.. instead compare with vivo x100pro 😢
ОтветитьVivo night video 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
ОтветитьDid you use a case while testing these smartphones on the x100 ultra?
ОтветитьWhy do all European, American, and other bloggers never drop a link to original photos? only bloggers from Russia do. Without the original files, it is impossible to tell which smartphone is really better on camera.
ОтветитьSelfie cam samsung
Back cam video ..apple 🍎
Pro max ❤
ОтветитьIt's ironic that iphone videos are great but their microphone sucks not sure if its the edit? haha
Ответитьw dzisiejszych czasach wszedzie sa podobne matryce wiec to kwestia gustu uzytkownikow a cala robote robi oprogramowanie aparatu i uzyte filtry... ja wybieram Samsung Galaxy s24 Ultra
ОтветитьI feel like VIVO you can do more post with, than the other two, then samsung, and then iPhone. iPhone has way too much post processing and I think that becomes problematic when you try to color grade later. It's great for no fuss, they have a decent algorithm. vivo just seems like it does nothing with their photos and videos. Samsung has a nice balance. Edit: One thing I HATE about the S24 Ultra is I take a photo of my dogs, for a split second the photo upon review in the gallery looks fine and then Samsung is like: "oops let's make the clear focal point of this photo not the dogs." And it has destroyed so many images.
ОтветитьIphone doing better in white balance
ОтветитьOppo find x7 ultra 🔥🔥🔥
ОтветитьGalaxy S24 Ultra is unbelievably good this year. Definitely much better than all previous models. Sure Vivo wins quite a few scenarios BUT Chinese ROM is a big disadvantage. From my experience it's nearly impossible to resell Vivo for any reasonable money - prepare to lose a lot. Regarding the photo quality, the difference is not like day and night. So win win for Samsung.
Ответитьvivo x100 ultra wins! will be ordering this beauty!
ОтветитьS24 Ultra 👍👍
ОтветитьIn vivo, you can reduce contrast and saturation in vivid mode. And add brightness in zeiss mode.
ОтветитьI remember years ago when everyone was praising iphone for their portraits mode
Until they realized that Vivo had better portrait and stitching than iphone😏😏
I don't see how iPhone wins in Videography here Tech Tablet.
The stability test was still awful on it 😕
Color was rubbish I prefer the vivo color to it but yet you said it has the best video?
😑😑
Seems like video has less shaky and best overall video for sure
ОтветитьI'm prefer Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
ОтветитьSo Apple will just not address the lens flare issue? 😢
ОтветитьHow good the sky looks at Iphone 16 pmax 😮😮
ОтветитьInfact Vivo ZEIS destroys all cameras
Ответитьlook at the camera 1200 dollars is very disgusting if the coating innovation is only 0.1% effective in eliminating flare😂
ОтветитьVivo's weakness is still the video. They've been focusing on improving their images for years that it is starting to get behind in terms of their video. They probably aiming to get a Professional Camera look in terms of Image and not video. Slightly disappointed with the potential
ОтветитьS24 Ultra is the winner 🎉
ОтветитьI think, in the Android/iOS race, it's either Samsung or Pixel devices. A phone's hardware is only as good as its software and the only brands that receive considerable OS updates are Samsung and Google on the Android side. So unless you are willing to upgrade year over year, those other brands are a complete no-no.
ОтветитьVivo is the best
ОтветитьDon't you get bored doing these? Nowadays they're basically all the same. Miniscule differences here or there
ОтветитьVivo has terrible audio😂😂😂
ОтветитьIphone changes the colors too much. Not consistent
Ответитьvivo is the best
ОтветитьZoom transitions apple is still years ahead any android sadly... I hope uou can get a pixel 9 pro xl soon chris
ОтветитьWhat is Vivo?
ОтветитьI actually like that iPhone is more true too life. Their video has always been saturated and punchy but now true to life
ОтветитьHow the fuck did Vivo blur the background without blurring SINGLE STRANDS of hair? That stuff is so well done I'd totally have believed it was real bokeh, and this is from a professional photographer.
Ответитьiphone are what videographer want
ОтветитьBro. For Vivo, it have vivid, texture and natural mode. Which mode you select for photography? As most photo is abit dark, i assumed it was test under texture mode.
Ответитьthe vivo sensor is amazing, the noise difference is really noticeable, i just dislike its blue tint... that the others don't show
ОтветитьA wise person will choose Samsung. Samsung is irreplaceable ❤
Ответитьty for this comparison i love that you picked the vivo x100
many other cc's just don't use the best competitors cause vivo isn't as established as google with the pixels
So Apple wins again😂
Ответитьiphone wins
Ответить