Комментарии:
Wow look at FSR3 Frame time in Forsaken its 0.7ms compare to dlss3 6.7ms. FSR 3 is really the star of the show here.
ОтветитьThank you AMD for upgrading my 3080 for free. I wont ever buy a NVIDIA ever again for ruining my expensive investment in just one generation with frame gen.
ОтветитьThe AA implementation on fsr3 is not that good as dlss AA
ОтветитьDLSS less frames but better quality, FSR more frames but worst quality, the same like always in this kind of benchmark’s
ОтветитьFranchement le FSR 3 se débrouille super bien pour la qualité d'image comparé au DLSS qui adoucie beaucoup. Mais il est vraiment pas au top sur tout ce qui est lumiere ou les cheveux, il produit des choses bizarre.. ainsi que sur le 1% low.. La dessus, le DLSS est vraiment très fort.
ОтветитьYou can expect that DLSS is always going to be better than anything FSR does because DLSS is done on a hardware level, which is higher quality than a software level implementation.
ОтветитьLooks like fsr has alot less stress on the gpu usage but quality isnt up to par to dlss
ОтветитьWhich game is this?
ОтветитьI tried forespoken with fsr 3. I hardly noticed any artifacting or image quality loss.
ОтветитьThey seriously need to update/improve the upscaling image quality.. or they will lose EVENTUALLY as it is.. after the DLSS 3.5 NIVIDA image UPSCALING is way to far to match the fsr2 fsr3 coz they both are the same..
ОтветитьExcept the dancing lights hows the overall upscaled image quality of fsr3 compared to dlss3.5 ??
ОтветитьFsr 3 can it's work on rx 550 or not 😅😅
ОтветитьWhich looks better and by howmuch?
Ответить