Комментарии:
5000€ sorry That is fuck Printer for Home!
ОтветитьNie dokładnie ta maszyna działa bardziej opłaci się zrobić kopię ulepszoną tej maszyny . Następny wariant drogi materiał wiele osób odpuści z takiej maszyny ponieważ ta maszyna jest czystym oszustwem materialnym czy to się opłaci? Przykładem porównaj tanie możliwości i najdrosze możliwości 😂 zrozumiesz co mam na myśli taka osoba z nigeri głodna nie będzie mogła używać tej aparatury . Jako mądrą osoba patrząc na tą maszynę to marnotractwo choć klawiatury podobnym stylem są robione 😉
Ответитьbro your hand soldering is driving me insane. use flux, use less solder, and hold the iron in the location where you are soldering for longer. dont pre-apply the solder to the iron.
ОтветитьThey are not of "acceptable quality"... I prefer to send them to be professionally manufactured in China.
ОтветитьYou can now print a PINTED circuit board 👏
ОтветитьFor me, its a really Big 'no' by the moment
ОтветитьPretty nasty, rather use the old technique, about as fast, apart from the drilling.
ОтветитьThis clearly is only good for extremely fast prototyping. Not for actual end designs on the wild.
Which is a good niche to cover.
You have to set your expectations correctly to give the real value and understand the purpose of this machine... which apparently you though you could build end-design PCB's with it, it's clearly not meant for that.
could you use this with a solder fountain instead of a soldering iron for first priming the ink before parts are soldered
ОтветитьNow we need to P-semiconductor and N-semiconductor ink for to print our own IC layouts
ОтветитьPrinters will become cheaper with time and even I may have one in the future. Thanks this was informative.
ОтветитьI will lose patience even by watching this
ОтветитьI'll wait for version 2.0
ОтветитьYeah, no. It is horrible for it's price and results. It's slow and has a lot of consumables. A small CNC drill will fair much better, not to mention quicker and cheaper. The fact that the ink can just come off is terrible. Sorry I couldn't be more positive, it just I don't understand who thought this would be a good idea.
ОтветитьLiked it
ОтветитьGreat PCB Printer
ОтветитьIt's fabulous that this exists, but honestly, given all the hassle, third party components to buy & buy ( the special inks etc . . . ) I'd rather wait a bit to get it from somewhere else. But awesome video, as always !!
ОтветитьDoes the system's software work on Linux ?
ОтветитьLoL - we are in 2023, and complaining about a custom PCB, with x layers, coming from the other side of the planet, taking 1 whoooole weeeeek :-))) Modern time problems.
Ответитьit looks horrible
ОтветитьWhat about using a Diode Laser to make a PCB?
ОтветитьCant a laser engraver do it better?
ОтветитьAwesome, thanks for sharing.
ОтветитьI think I still like my method of using tack-less PCBs and making nearby connections with solder and the more further away ones with a sort of jumper cable that is really easy to work with: single conductor, slightly rigid so can be bent to stay in place, 0.75 mm2 cross section. I have these in spools in red, black, yellow, green and white. They cost virtually nothing and are a joy to work with.
ОтветитьI even looked at the printer itself
he said it like that printer was not needed
Crazy price, but oboy, I want one.😆
ОтветитьWhere i can find a rivet tool for pcb
ОтветитьThis looks incredibly cool but it's way too expensive actually. I would pay at most 1,500 for a device like this.
ОтветитьYour channel is awesome.
ОтветитьThis just solidifies the fact we’re stepping closer and closer into cyberpunk
ОтветитьMos fats sounds like a starwars character
Ответитьholy shit this is amazing.
ОтветитьI think it has a long way to go, however this seems like you might be able to combine it with regular 3d printing, which means you could do 3d circuits inside parts. Quite exciting!
ОтветитьI was curious about this product but now I know it is not for me. If I have time I'll order on jlc. If I need it here and now I'll just use Laser-Ironing to make my own. For those who don't know this tec: Print your PCB layout mirrored on a gloss photopaper on laser printer, then put it on a copper coated pcb board, then use an iron to press it to the pcb. It will transfer the ink onto pcb. Then wash off paper and you will have traces on copper. To remove exessive copper you simply put this pcb into mix of Hydrogenpyroxide and Lemon acid for half hour. Then wash it, drill it and you are golden. 2 hours of work will give you much better quality of the traces than voltera and you you will save a lot of money:)
ОтветитьIsn't etching always better than this? Way smaller startup cost, less calibrating, less pricy consumables, less time, more sturdy, and higher fidelity ?
ОтветитьThanks for this honest review!👍
ОтветитьExcellent video! What is the "sacrificial layer"? (I don't yet own a 3D printer and have never done a 3D printer project before, so I have a lot of vocabulary to learn yet. Is there a good 3D printing vocabulary sheet somewhere online I could refer to?)
ОтветитьHi and thank's for your video.
At this price i'd buy a guided laser on x-y axes may be. Some are pretty good, but i do not really know the limits of that.
For now i'm etching circuit pads and tracks with solder a solder masq paste that i bought before : i bought a lot.
It was quite expensive but the result is perfect. So i use thypons calcs , the old way. Solder masq is negative but it is not a problem at all.
I do not trust pre-sensibilisated cards any more because i had problem with them and they are quite expensive too.
For simple sided bords : i modified a printer and it prints toner on the board that i need to fuse with acetone vapors.
This is actually the thinner method i've got but it make only single side difficult to align with simple solutions.
And there are many problems :
1/ the printer drum can be easilly damaged with your cards because it's hard compare to paper.
2/Sometime the electric charging roller does not seam to conduct on the drum because printing is pale.
May be a security problem because the card is probable to much conductive compare to paper.
I do not believe in a mechanical method: printers make many distorted proportions for these reasons:
Drums shapes, speed variations, Drum status and clearance, rollers status and clearance, etc...
forces me to print each layer on different calcs but at the same place.
Which cost a lot in calcs.
I thought about a solution : photographic uv exposure: concentrate the light of a L.C.D screen on which you print the circuit on the board with a lens.
But the LCD should have is internal L.E.D or lamp changed with UV ones. Not sure it is so easy to achieve.
And not sure it will work : let's try...
The UV peelable pastes are very expensive but if you are a chimist : you could may be make then yourself at very lower prices.
Same for the metalisation wich is a complicated process too.
For now : i do not metalise which is another problem too sometimes.
i'd wear prada instead
ОтветитьNot worth $5,000.
Ответить$5200 ! visit the devils domain
ОтветитьLove your silly videos
ОтветитьYeah, nah.
ОтветитьI look at this and I think:
The dot matrix printer was superior to the daisy wheel because it allowed graphics as well as text. The laser was superior to the dot matrix because it gave far better resolution, ink-jets have driven the costs down (kind of, original ink cartridges are still expensive) and the 3D printers have taken printing into a while other dimension.
This PCB printer, is the first step on a journey that will develop into a better product, with higher resolution and be more cost effective.
Thank you for sharing.
Who even uses solder masks these days.
ОтветитьFlux, please
ОтветитьWhat ? No Solder Mask ? .. how can you call it a PCB without Soldemask or via plating ???
Ответить