Cyberpunk 2077 Psycho Ray Tracing VS Path Tracing DLSS 4K | RTX 4090 | i9 13900K 6GHz

the difference is so ridiculous

Why space reflections on Ultra if they are replaced by Ray Traced reflections?You get a big hit on performance without any visual improvement...

I would love a setup like this, but I'm a broke-ass college student. But hell it is lovely to look at. Nice comparison shots to really demonstrate the difference!

got a 4080. i can get 65 fps with optimization on path tracing. cant record the game on path tracing i think

Там ещё если включить внизу Путь, то наверху открывается включается доп опция.

500 Watt power draw!!

Luckily I see no difference so I'll save money and stick to my 3080 ti. Only thing I did notice was it was darker inside the car but then I have that anyways cause I use HDR.

Not enough fidelity gain from the performance impact.

55 fps with DLSS on balanced on a 2000$ or more GPU.....I'd be pissed. I had a titanxp that was literally steamrolling everything 4k at 90fps all ultra almost 10 years ago already when DLSS or scaling didn't even exist and now all we have is a fake 4k quality output for not even 60fps...

bruh how did Panam's hair get bleched in RT mode in that tank xDDD

my game's running well with rtx, but the path tracing is sucking the hell of my 4060 laptop

Reckon you could do the same test but use the built in benchmark? Would like to compare using your exact settings.. Frame generation on, DLSS on Quality or off and ray tracing high, and ultra. With depth of field turned off and motion blur off. I have a 4080 which is a significant upgrade in this game compared to my 3090 due to frame gen and dlss 3 (very cool they implimented this so quickly).. but as I only play 4K for the last decade just would love to see how much of a difference it would make as to compare with

Path Tracing looks better in some scenes, but the difference isn't worth the drop in FPS, especially on mid range cards.

Wow! I am amazed about how I do not see much a difference for such a huge performance hit.

Holy smokes 500-520W of power draw for the GPU, that is INSANE!

no combat testing?

Okay so I am looking at both the FPS and the GPU load which is around 98-99 percent on both. So if they decided to make that card with say 48 gigs of vram would that load be cut way down or is it something to do with the silicon, cores, speed? Because if they can basically just keep the 4090 chipset and create a card with a 48 gigs...well why not? vram is actually cheap, the 2-3nm silicon chips is the real cost of producing the chips.

but can it run cyberpunk ?

its sad that 3060 cant do path tracing :-(

which program did you use to track your system loads and stuff?

What a useless technology... not even realistic. as if in life everything was a mirror like that...

Interesting that the Path tracing uses significantly less cpu.

Can’t wait to see omnitracing on rtx 6000

literally no sense to pay for SUCH SMALL details
Path traicing is only somehow better indoors but it makes everything dark

Very similar but pat tracing has less FPS and more Watts.

Should've done this with DLSS off (DLSS is essentially rendering at a much lower resolution then up-scaling/stretching the image with some filters and deep-learning/AI processing, then spitting out the frame to screen)
4k + DLSS is basically like 1080/1440p internal then upscaled and presented

watching this in 240p

path tracing 👍 maybe playable in 2030 without dlss or fsr 🤣

its so not worth it for the massive loss in fps.

GPU 500watts +? Ridiculous

Hi!
Is it normal that when path tracing is enabled, the photo mode often freezes when I take a picture? I have RTX 4070 Ti.

Watching at 480p and its impressive
I wish i could try this someday

How did this guy cool this i9?
What cooler did u use

I'm struggling to see the huge difference that would worth sacrificing 50% fps.
And in general just to see the difference, even with 0 fps impact, I'm not sure I would say I like path tracing more in a blind test.

Looks like muc. Aye?

sorrybut this is bulsiht, its like trying to compare diet coke to coke zero. both taste like crap equaly the same.

There you go.. Path tracing - the New King of the scene!!
Now all the guru out there woult tell US why we should need to love more Path tracing, and have 30FPS lover, and still loving it to the hell!!!
Pleaso, go on... lol

RAY TRACING IS GIMMICK GARBAGE AND THE INDUSTRY NEEDS TO JUST PULL THE FUCKING PLUG ON THIS GARBAGE NOT A SINGLE GAME IS GOING TO RADE HALF THEIR FPS JUST FOR SOME FUCKING SHADOWS LIKE HOW DUMB ARE DEVELOPERS NOBODY WANTS THIS SHIT LITERALLY NOT A SINGLE PERSON WANTS RAY TRACING STOP IT ITS FUCKING DEAD

how does path tracing work exactly?

Imagine if ray tracing was released after path tracing. omg wtf 30% extra FPS with similar quality buy our new GPU range

Talk about diminishing returns. See u all in 10 years.

Thx for video. Respect to Your work.

Texture is important than ray tracing. Game textures are not going more. Example one: Human dress is like pattern at games. Not looking like real life. Pattern cartoonish feeling is not good. Games characthers are like robot. Not changed at 10 years. Ray tracing is so early for now, useless hardware works.

this game is basically a benchmarking tool lmaoo

Wieso gibt es etwas, womit man mit dem besten und teuersten Setting gerade mal 55 FPS erreicht.? Das ist doch unspielbar und völlig sinnfrei. Raytracing macht auf meiner 4080 auf 2K schon garkeinen Sinn, weil ich keinen Bock auf 90 FPS und eine Ruckelparty habe. Ich verstehe es nicht. Lieber supersmooth 170 FPS als sowas hier.