False Positives vs. False Negatives in Science and Statistics (Type 1 and Type 2 Error)

False Positives vs. False Negatives in Science and Statistics (Type 1 and Type 2 Error)

Data Demystified

3 года назад

12,074 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@ratuoptions6098
@ratuoptions6098 - 02.01.2024 14:10

thank you sir

Ответить
@user-cn8wt9lv4l
@user-cn8wt9lv4l - 05.11.2023 00:34

you are the best

Ответить
@Israelxox
@Israelxox - 24.10.2023 15:47

Type I error (falsely rejecting a null hypothesis) and type II error (falsely accepting a null hypothesis).

Ответить
@gooddeedsleadto7499
@gooddeedsleadto7499 - 22.05.2023 16:53

False positive is alpha in the hypothesis testing? Actually lawful but the jury finds him guilty.
False negative is Beta in the hypothesis testing?
Actually criminal but the jury finds him not guilty.

Ответить
@jeffreya.faulkner8367
@jeffreya.faulkner8367 - 16.04.2023 02:24

I take it that the null hypothesis is considered a negative and the alternate hypothesis is considered a positive.

Ответить
@danzellamoye7207
@danzellamoye7207 - 20.03.2023 18:18

Thank you

Ответить
@ay4704
@ay4704 - 09.12.2022 00:15

I really enjoyed the lesson. Thanks for enlightening me on the context because the type one error is known to be worse, but after watching your video, I have to understand the context and be wiser regarding the conclusion and required action.

Ответить
@jupiter3093
@jupiter3093 - 05.07.2022 21:19

Well it depends on the benefits that come from the results , i mean newton theory had a beneficial outcome although it is not totally true

Ответить
@MDMAx
@MDMAx - 30.04.2022 07:59

Finally this topic makes sense. Thank you!

Ответить
@franceso5266
@franceso5266 - 13.04.2022 11:33

you are by far the best at explaining this stuff

Ответить
@santiagodm3483
@santiagodm3483 - 02.04.2022 02:57

It's a little difficult to make a claim about what is worst in science. False positives
a re far more commons than negative positives, given those conditions, it's easier to run into false positive than with negative positives, because we do care about the sample size and the spread or variability of the data instead of caring about the randomness and uncertainty around false positives more frequently. It's kind of bias or something like that with the uncertainty.

Ответить
@nirajneupane4549
@nirajneupane4549 - 27.03.2022 02:42

let us suupose there are 100 students in each school and we measure the height of all students and compare between two school, can we say we can get 100% errorless result?

Ответить
@furyberserk
@furyberserk - 21.10.2021 03:14

The first example is bad. It helps with nothing. I've given it an hour with no clear understanding between them, nor perspective of what is true. You cannot ask this question and get a right answer 100% of the time.

Ответить
@soulifiy8209
@soulifiy8209 - 27.06.2021 16:09

Excellent explanation on these concepts especially to laymen. thank you so much

Ответить
@papibertfully
@papibertfully - 15.06.2021 04:35

Great video. Many thanks.

Ответить
@victorialeigh2726
@victorialeigh2726 - 12.06.2021 19:16

Hey doctor Jeff, having a strong feeling that you will rise fast and become one of the youtibe heriage of education.

I believe that writing about a range of topics is a good way to improve one's understanding. I find your closing question insightful. Thank you for your lecture.

Ответить
@beachboardfan9544
@beachboardfan9544 - 22.05.2021 17:57

So out of 1000 student schools, how large would the sample sizes of each school have to be to minimize the possibility of a false positive/negative?

Ответить
@dodgeballcannon
@dodgeballcannon - 21.05.2021 02:22

In information retrieval these are called recall and precision.

Ответить