Комментарии:
Analyze “ The Lady in My Life ” from the thriller album , please
ОтветитьSimplicity and layering. Creating space for other sounds is what I learned
ОтветитьThis is truly a KILLER groove. And one of MJS top 10 vocal deliveries of alltime. Absolute perfection. And pure electro funk.
ОтветитьThe low voice was Quincy Jones
ОтветитьTrack down Dangerous please.
ОтветитьThe Weeknd's vocals influenced by MJ.
ОтветитьCan you react to “Butterflies” from MJ?
Ответитьwhere did you find this multitrack ? i would be so happy to get it 😎
ОтветитьOne of my favourite songs from Thriller that stood out to me when i bought the tape in 82! Great drums N,dugu Chancelor Percussion by Paulinho Da Costa and as mentioned already Paul Jackson Jr on guitar! Louis Johnson funk bass of course quality production!
ОтветитьThis video is brilliant
ОтветитьGee wiz the drums ALONE is groovy as all get out ❤
ОтветитьI call it Disney production.
Ответитьcool
ОтветитьGoosebumps from the Voice💯The Best MJ
ОтветитьWhere does het get these multitracks from?
ОтветитьQ is a genius
ОтветитьThe first groove remembers me of the Chaka and Rufus - Do you love what you feel. Maybe there was an inspiration, considering Quincy Jones produced the 1979's jam and wrote this one with Michael.
Great song. Thanks for sharing. ❤
I first heard this song when a friend of mine was getting out of a cab on Valentine Ave in the Bronx.
She opened the door and I was like “wtf is that?”
It played from 119 (in logic) till the end.
I was frozen. She was talking to me and although her mouth moved I didn’t hear a word she said.
It was 3 in the morning and the streets were silent.
I listened till the end because the cab got caught at the light.
The next day I asked her what the song was and she said “that’s the Thriller album silly.”
(I hadn’t heard the album. This is before PYT was a single.)
I copped the album the next day and heard the whole song and was blown away.
I played it about 40 times in my Walkman and knew every sound and how to sing it (mouth it) by the end of the day.
Sooo many tickly ear candy sounds on that track. And funky as hell!
Respect to Quincy Jones
ОтветитьMichael is the man
ОтветитьDude, where are you located? Your studio looks like it's arranged just like my old boss's studio.
ОтветитьNana=vag
ОтветитьSM7, there were no SM7B that time.
ОтветитьDrum is so fasty Billie Jean tho !
ОтветитьAmazing!
ОтветитьI actually prefer the version that Michael Jackson and greg phillinganes wrote
ОтветитьAmazing and thank you!❤❤
ОтветитьHow can we get the full track?
ОтветитьI absolutely love isolated tracks on these famous songs. And the educational value is a godsend
ОтветитьAlways I'm asking my self there is something special I'm Michael Jackson songs which is the beats and tons, now I know why 😉
ОтветитьNote to todays artists; No Auto-tune!
ОтветитьHOW DID YOU GET THIS? Westlake Studio?
ОтветитьPaul Jackson Jr can do it ALL. The absolute perfect guitarist, world class, and he played all the guitar tracks on this cut.
ОтветитьWhy are the vocal tracks doubled up like that? Because Quincy Jones was a genius. This album is the holy bible for all pop music to follow. You had Steve Lukather, Jeff Pocaro, Steve Pocaro, Vincent Price, Quincy Jones, Paul McCartney, Eddie Van Hale…. ‘Nuff said.
ОтветитьCan u do my faves you rock my world and remember the time
ОтветитьYou shining bald beauty! Brilliant analysis of a great song. Thank you mate from England!!
ОтветитьSounds like I'm knocking on modern production, but it's just my take on it. I love good music regardless of genre and time period, but still:
So the vocals sound "unfinished" because there wasn't any autotune or pitch tuning back then aside from rudimentary vocoding (which Mike didn't use save for pure effects). It's also why a lot of older tracks, not just Michael Jackson stuff" still stands out and has a personality; it's not trying to be perfect past recording/in post, it's trying to express and be as good as it can be 'while' recording. Put them vocals together and you get a story, not just a technical blob of perfect information. Definitely a sound example on how "less is more", and the mindset back then vs now
I sorta hope that there's a "natural" trend in the future where people do just go for good takes rather than using Melodyne to fix it in post, and sorta "feel" out things instead of going off of a "path to success" flowchart. Honestly would be a shock of cold water against how things are following that "flowchart" to a T and sounding samey even with all of the genres on display these days
It's not that modern Pop sounds bad, just way too uniform, ironically not really "popping". Meanwhile there's an example from the King of Pop from several decades ago that's blowing modern minds with things like "hey let's layer my unprocessed (save compression) vocals", it's a lil telling honestly
Look, I'm not a modern pop lover at all. Most of it these days is far too generic, kids in bedrooms with loops. I am a hard rock lover, where genuine actual studio originality and musicianship still reigns. Even still, what Quincy Jones did with Michael's arrangements back then, is still something huge. Respect. And you had the original tape prints rendered & transferred to HD file stems to audtion? Lucky man!
And please, people, quit the 'Rock' anologies. He was never Rock!!!! Makes me puke that some can even confuse rock with pop. Rock is guitar driven music. He knew that. But Michael is the King of Pop. He knew that too.
"Yeah...you need some loving" Naughty Q 😂
Brilliant as always ❣
is there any chance to get this multitrack?
Ответитьdownload where?
ОтветитьSo, who else went and played the song right after watching this?
ОтветитьThat low voice was Quincy Jones. Just sayin......
Ответить