Комментарии:
THis is beautiful and succinct. Now let me try if it works. For the life of m;e, I know I am supposed to type cast but keep doing the wrong things
ОтветитьAye Jack Harlow teaching C++ now
ОтветитьYour last name is Curry?
ОтветитьMan, I just became aware of your channel.
Awesome!
Congrats, you've won a new subscriber!
What you have is same, form is different.
Ответитьaayy
thenks bro
so uhmm you are really cute :"D
ОтветитьThank you so much! Your tutorials are fun to watch and keep me interested, thanks!!
ОтветитьI think that your videos typify outstanding educational value; keep up the great work!
ОтветитьThis hair fits you.
ОтветитьThank you so much . you are better than my Professor 🙏
ОтветитьBad hair day? Lol
ОтветитьThanks a lot, its very helpful
ОтветитьThank you Caleb for explaining this in layman's terms. This is the best explanation I've come across so far.
ОтветитьThe beginning example really wasn't clear, it would've been better to explain giving him the quarters seperately not working. Personally i got confused saying you couldn't add something like 1.0 to 1.
ОтветитьThe Best!
Ответитьsounds are great buddy
ОтветитьYou are an amazing teacher. Thank you for your tutorials!
Ответитьwhat happened to his hairs between the last video and this one
ОтветитьThanks sir,
love from India
Thank you Caleb!!
But the hair in this one 😂😂😂😂😂😂 You're the best 🤗
I'm really enjoying this tutorials, thanks, you're great! <3
ОтветитьI love you man
ОтветитьThe two types of type casting are implicit and explicit, right? Is it different from implicit and explicit type of coercion? I would love to hear your answer bro!
ОтветитьFinally a non Indian tutorial
Ответитьvery well explained. now i understand type casting way better than i did before:) thaNksssssss
Ответитьhahahah I loved the explanation
ОтветитьLots of bizarre nonsense and completely incorrect assertions. C language supports implicit conversions between `int` and `double` in both directions. Contrary to what he states, you don't "have" to use an explicit cast for converting from `double` to `int`. There's no and there has never been the requirement to use an explicit cast in such cases.
ОтветитьDid you just switched hands with writing? Impressive.
ОтветитьI like your content, this video is so easy to understand even to a global student from China like me.
Ответитьdude, by far the best analogy ever of typecasting. Thanks!
Ответитьbeautiful way of putting the concept alltogether:)
ОтветитьVery clear and creative explanation .
Ответитьthat there hair tho
ОтветитьThank you! Your videos are very helpful :)
Please continue to share your knowledge with the world!