Bobby Fischer on Paul Morphy and how opening theory destroyed chess #chess960

Bobby Fischer on Paul Morphy and how opening theory destroyed chess #chess960

GoodKnightChess

3 года назад

2,315,166 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Derek Mitchell
Derek Mitchell - 23.09.2023 20:40

This is why Magnus is so special. He’s good enough forces even the best players out of their prearranged book knowledge & memorized sequences.

Ответить
Stacie Lin
Stacie Lin - 23.09.2023 18:51

Europa Universalis is also solved and broken for high level players. The problem isn't that chess can be completely dissected by machine logic, it's that people think chess is magical, special and important. It's just a fucking board game. Get over it. Nobody gives a shit that Sorry is solved. People still play Checkers, too.

Ответить
Dale Leisenring
Dale Leisenring - 22.09.2023 15:16

Fischers greatest contribution to chess is probably Fischer Random AKA Chess960
You know when you play any opponent who has played standard chess seriously for just a few years knows theory on most main lines of all main openings. But when you
play 960, you know the opponent, just like you, is not "Booked up" and knows the best main lines and theory. So it makes even much better players than your self work for the win. Most of the time it takes a few minutes just to get an initial opening eval of any quality. I've opened and lost the initiative quickly by a blunder on move one! Then, in the post mortem analysis, I see the error I made was not something I didnt understand. It was that I didnt have a lifetime of experience and theory to lean on.

Ответить
Guter
Guter - 21.09.2023 22:38

is it just me or Bobby Fischer is real world Rick Sanchez in terms of speaking style?

Ответить
Christian
Christian - 21.09.2023 20:46

Is there a mathematical theory (or a beginning) of chess?

Ответить
Genx
Genx - 20.09.2023 19:32

He was talking about computer when creativity is down the list

Ответить
Sameer
Sameer - 20.09.2023 10:37

Isn't this true with our real life too? Hasn't most of the schooling and education (and even workplaces) become like rigid opening theories? We are all (at least most of us are) following pre-defined paths, because, if we don't, we don't stand a chance in the competition where everyone else is "getting the advantage" of following these "opening theories". Where and what TF my life has been spent in? Just "competing" and not living 🥴

Ответить
Rob Radomski
Rob Radomski - 20.09.2023 09:46

Fischer isn't wrong.... I'm assuming it's an interview even though he seems like he's annoyed by them. People are so pathetic wanting to take photos and ask questions to celebrities all the time. It seems like most people don't have any self-awareness to realize people want to be left alone

Ответить
Angelo Otavio
Angelo Otavio - 20.09.2023 09:34

Star treck tri-dimensional chess: the confrontation "Pica of the Galaxies": Spock x Bobby
.
I agree with the great Bobby Fischer: speed chess is the prove of the truth of anything he said in this airplane interview

Ответить
Angelo Otavio
Angelo Otavio - 20.09.2023 09:26

Conclusion: at certain point, chess became limitated and small to him ... his chess geniality needed more pieces and more squares in a bigger board

Ответить
Jerry Holder
Jerry Holder - 20.09.2023 04:49

very cool to see and hear Fischer in his later years. Sounded perfectly coherent to me. thanks for posting.

Ответить
branominal
branominal - 20.09.2023 00:01

He's absolutely right, the vast majority of chess is just theory, especially in the era of engines being far more powerful than the best human player, it's just a memorisation game.

A little creativity towards the end is important of course, but if you can memorise enough, you could beat a lot of more talented, creative players just by dominating them through the early-mid game

Ответить
Philip Dennis
Philip Dennis - 19.09.2023 06:29

Bobby Fischer was the last "Lone World Beater"! He entered history alone. He was correct that computer teams and analysts were key to the success of all World Chess Champions after Bobby.

Ответить
AlfieP
AlfieP - 19.09.2023 02:51

He lost his mind decades ago

Ответить
Shantanu Paranji
Shantanu Paranji - 18.09.2023 23:58

man i can't stand interviewers who interrupt their guest. isn't the whole point of interviewing someone to LISTEN to them? let them finish their train of thought before asking another meaningless question

Ответить
Michael Sever
Michael Sever - 18.09.2023 10:43

Glad he was a part of our generation.

Ответить
Jake Tobias
Jake Tobias - 18.09.2023 04:39

Isn't this why speed chess was invented?

Ответить
Chuck Coulter
Chuck Coulter - 17.09.2023 22:33

I feel Fischer has been mistreated by poor press. This man has a strong argument and reveals the result of loving, enjoying, a game that people made into something else entirely, sapping imagination from it, reducing it.

Ответить
Michael Lu
Michael Lu - 17.09.2023 21:04

He wasn’t insane, as his critics claimed, but insanely intelligent.

Ответить
Charlie Skinner
Charlie Skinner - 17.09.2023 04:49

I’ve been learning chess from my roommate who is quite good (lessons as a child, plays tournaments, plays online ranked at 1650) and I’ve found that the game is a lot how Fisher describes it. After a good game we will analyze it and all my mistakes are in the openings and there is just knowledge that I don’t have that he does. So to get better I have to either memorize these openings or play tens of thousands of games to develop this knowledge. Which frankly, is not very fun to me. I enjoyed playing with my brothers when I was young and neither of us knew these things but the games were much more exciting! I’m not sure I want to learn chess anymore if the game gets less fun at higher levels.

Ответить
Maxime Savard-Beaudoin
Maxime Savard-Beaudoin - 15.09.2023 06:27

try 4 player chess if you guys want to have fun

Ответить
Maxime Savard-Beaudoin
Maxime Savard-Beaudoin - 15.09.2023 06:27

i kinda agree... the 1800+ range is just knowing moves by heart
its like <<having fun>> and trying to outplay your opponent, its mostly who blunders the hardest in low ELO and higher ELO is just memorizing lines and being more prepared

Ответить
theinvisibleman
theinvisibleman - 14.09.2023 19:21

Dude is a genius

Ответить
keytothegate K
keytothegate K - 14.09.2023 08:33

And yet for a man of this unique high caliber they dare to say he was crazy

Ответить
Deborah
Deborah - 14.09.2023 02:17

He thinks chess is an art when it’s a game which is closer to a sport which means the better prepared guy will win almost every time not given some sort of miracle

Ответить
dutchbagel
dutchbagel - 14.09.2023 00:49

He would have loved fortnite

Ответить
Hunt clips
Hunt clips - 14.09.2023 00:32

Sigh, I think I know why he “disappeared”. Damn.

Ответить
Anastacy Jomar
Anastacy Jomar - 13.09.2023 22:20

Bobby Fischer, the best.

Ответить
R Lewis
R Lewis - 13.09.2023 02:17

The most concerning modern-day's paradox is that the more intelligent the computers we make the -dumber we become...

Ответить
Thomas K
Thomas K - 13.09.2023 00:26

Like high-level blackjack. The "better" you are the more mechanistic with less fun.

Ответить
Thomas Frick
Thomas Frick - 12.09.2023 21:31

Has he ever played Magnus?

Ответить
Following the Roe
Following the Roe - 12.09.2023 21:20

He is saying that computational theory is making chess boring. But if you look at game design as a whole, that computational power has been used to provide the procedural generation necessary to make a lot of games that would have been otherwise forgetable: strategy games, RPGs, sandbox games. The creativity and replayability of these games is owed to their random nature. They still have hard set and predictable rules, but they are modular and can fit into random scenarios.

It was like a light-bulb went off in my head to connect these ideas when he started talking about Fischer-Random, the whole goal of carrying the integrity of chesses design while retaining its replayability.

Ответить
paenutz
paenutz - 12.09.2023 14:41

hes right. It's disgusting. It's a game about knowledge, not intelligence.

Ответить
Yosi Vinbaiter
Yosi Vinbaiter - 12.09.2023 12:36

This is why my grandfather brother Benny, may live long told me years ago when I was a kid that chess is not mind game it's a memory game, and that Snooker is much better.

Ответить
u/n/kown
u/n/kown - 12.09.2023 08:16

Exactly ,those same openings and exchanging pieces just to promote a queen is boring no one would like to watch 2 players exchange every piece, that's why i like tal's game i have rarely seen him play endgame

Ответить
t1n
t1n - 11.09.2023 22:19

He seems utterly egoless about chess. And as someone who sorta abhors memorizing chess moves, I definitely feel like I have a better chance against people when I play chess 960.

Ответить
mikhail Bot.
mikhail Bot. - 11.09.2023 09:25

A real warrior!. He never stopped figthting to find the best move. He never gave an easy draw even when the positiion was techinically drawish! Without books, computers, IA and withour a team to help him. He was the best!! I wonder how many players could reach his achievements without the money and resources tha professional players have nowdays

Ответить
Lupara Bianca
Lupara Bianca - 11.09.2023 04:15

Very DaVinci looking here.

Ответить
Alan Coe
Alan Coe - 10.09.2023 23:52

He should have just taken a laxative powerful enough to get his head out of his ass and just played the Hippopotamus. Both sides. Fuck, man, it's a game. He still could beat anyone today. Autism has it's strengths.

Ответить
FM
FM - 10.09.2023 23:12

Genius, but with some problems. 💥

Ответить
laxmi LS
laxmi LS - 10.09.2023 15:43

The greatest of them all

Ответить
mitchcraft
mitchcraft - 10.09.2023 02:13

Oh dear what a question to ask Bobby with the subtitles on at the least few minutes and his answer was brilliant lol

Ответить
JONAS CAMPOS
JONAS CAMPOS - 09.09.2023 17:05

He just dont want to memorize games and thats why he hates it, its like the people that hates woman because cant get atracttive for one...

Ответить
combined effects
combined effects - 09.09.2023 00:39

I wonder if Paul Morphy was the greatest chess player ?

Ответить
Ruben S
Ruben S - 08.09.2023 04:01

Tal will disagree.Probably best creative genius chess player ever lived

Ответить
Andrew Prahst
Andrew Prahst - 08.09.2023 03:34

Man this is what I've been saying all along

Ответить
Saiphedias0815
Saiphedias0815 - 07.09.2023 21:10

Genius. Legend. Honest. Real. True. Experienced. Period.

Ответить
Gaurav Jha
Gaurav Jha - 07.09.2023 01:21

A Chess Player's actual brilliance is known when he makes a move not known in the books , over the board & within the time limit given to him...

Ответить
funda tv
funda tv - 06.09.2023 19:08

The saddest part is that did never arranged interview with Paul morphy. However, video cameras were invented in those days.

Ответить