Комментарии:
I.S.S.? More like P.I.S.S.
ОтветитьIss is dumb since its fiction and a lie
ОтветитьBoth my boyfriend and i just looked at each other after the ending and just went..."thats it???". Ive never been less fullfulled after an ending.
Ответитьbro is really reviewing every movie except the iron claw smfh
ОтветитьEver since you gloated over Last Jedi I have had serious trepidation with your reviews.
You seem like s nice dude. I hope you make a public announcement denouncing The Last Jedi 😂
I think your review is very even handed and thorough. However I want to add that I see it as a story about human nature and how we react under pressure. I think it was quite important the scenes with the mice. The mice at the beginning being so afraid of the weightless become aggressive with each other and bite each other to death. She finds them all bloody and missing parts. (Not that mice in real life behave that way). And at the end two mice that had stayed calm holding on to the mesh were peaceful and okay. I think was used as a symbol for the people. Kinda like saying that the fact of freaking out on paranoid distrust was their undoing and the two who mostly kept calm were able to weather the crisis. However I think that the most important line of the movie is the very last one, too bad it's said quite softly. She radioes NASA that they are going down, they answer that they are willing to welcome any US astronauts (in other words not the Russian guy). She looks at him, he asks her "Where are we going?" And she answers "I don't know"... and it ends with the important question unanswered...
Because it is like nowhere will they be welcomed together as friends because the world has become so polarized.
That "ISSSSSSSS"....awkward pause in the beginning made me legit LOL
ОтветитьAs long as it's not boring. Worth a look imo
ОтветитьPresident Bush said that NASA would start with unmanned missions. ‘’beginning no later than 2008, we will send a series of robotic missions to the lunar surface to research and prepare for future human exploration.’’ Bush planned for the first manned mission to the moon in 2015.
2015 has come and gone, and there has been no NASA manned missions. Why not? It would seem easy enough. Just dust off the old Apollo program plans and start right up again. The rockets and landers supposedly worked perfectly on six separate moon missions 40 years ago, with much older technology. Going back to the moon, with today’s technology, should be a piece of cake.
It seems that NASA cannot replicate the Apollo missions and is therefore forced to go back to the drawing board. Why? One reason is that NASA and its contractors allegedly lost the plans for the Lunar Excursion Module (LEM) and the Lunar Rover. They also claim that they lost the plans for the huge engines that powered the Apollo spacecraft.
Don Pettit is a NASA astronaut who is a veteran of several long duration missions aboard the mythical International Space Station. In 2016, Pettit was speaking at the Space for Innovation Conference at London’s Science Museum, where he stated: ‘’I’d go back to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is that we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology. And it’s a painful to build it back again.’’
When there are allegations that an event was faked, and evidence that could prove that it actually happened disappears while it is in the possession of the perpetrators of the alleged fraud, the only reasonable conclusion is that the missing evidence would prove the fraud.
Obviously, the plans were made to disappear, because those plans would reveal the impossibility of landing on the moon. NASA and their contractors would rather appear to be incompetent knuckleheads, than be indicted for criminal fraud, so they just ‘’lost’’ the plans that could prove the fraud.
NASA is good at taking great studio photographs of the astronauts and producing elaborate patches to memorialize its missions for posterity. However, it can’t seem to maintain the really important records of its alleged achievements. Aaron Ranen discovered during production of his documentary of the Apollo moon missions that all the audio tapes from the Apollo missions have also disappeared.
Nuclear war happens. Take the I.S.S. at all cost! Even though it has no military value and we probably won't be in a position to resupply you or bring you down! Brilliant.
ОтветитьI saw I. S. S. Today. It's a Movie I will never watch again. I will not be buying it either. Here was my problem with it. You have to read what the Russians are saying all through the movie. I hate to read movies. If i want to read I'll read a book. I go to see movies to watch them not to read, And because I couldn't read fast enough, I missed a lot of the movie and what was going on? So I didn't understand it all. If your going to make an American movie, Have all the characters speak in English so we the audience don't have to sit and read for 2 hours. The actors weren't bad and some of the action was fine, But please speak in English so we don't have to read. I give it a 1 Star as a rating. Don't waste your money unless you don't mind reading through the entire movie.
ОтветитьIsssssssssssss. LOL Wasn't expecting that.
ОтветитьIt’s like gravity. But on a budget. 😢
ОтветитьWhy dont you review talk to me ?
ОтветитьWow!
A CGI movie about a CGI space station.
How REAL is that!?
Glad they cast Masha Mashkova as one of the Russian astronauts since she did a great job for "For All Mankind".
ОтветитьEnjoyed watching this movie
ОтветитьI enjoyed the movie like 3.5-4/5 stars but the reviews pissed me off. For example, one is complaining about the fact that the lead is a black gay woman, another was that the inside of the ISS was too "realistic" and not interesting enough, another was that astronauts would never kill each other. Like the complaints felt dumb and yours are valid just I feel that this movie is getting trashed by some reviewers for no reason (again, not referencing you just people on Google.)
ОтветитьLooks awesome!!
ОтветитьIt’s like “Gravity” invented the SFX template every film in orbit since is using , yet none of them are nearly as impactful. You’ve got no excuse for lame visual compositions, especially in a “floaty” environment!
ОтветитьThe movie, for me, was very good, especially the story, and the characters were ambiguous and tense between each other! My review of the movie 8/10
ОтветитьThis movie was ass!!!
ОтветитьIt’s like Adam Sandler’s critics…they don’t like shit he makes unless it’s completely about Judaism. Looks like you can relate
ОтветитьChris is biased. He grew up on the I.S.S.
ОтветитьYep you got that right! When just one look 👀 is all it took!!!!!
ОтветитьTHERE IS A BLACK LESBIAN LEAD...WELCOME TO 2024 - Why is it part of the story? Why is it relevant? Why are men always presented as corrupt, pathetic, or victims while women are the strong heroes now?
ОтветитьAre you going to review Society of the Snow?
Ответитьdoes anyone know if this is coming to Norway.....
ОтветитьWhy you refuse to criticize bad movies? ISS isn’t great at all
ОтветитьIf you can't be honest without being vague, don't review everything.
Ответить..........................still the most low-effort content you were making years ago. I don't understand lmfao Chris, what are you doing
ОтветитьThat shirt rules. That movie traumatized me as a child
ОтветитьI recommend Society of the snow❤
ОтветитьHaving just watched it, I'd say that you absolutely nailed the review. Agree 100%.
ОтветитьWhen are you reviewing Better Call Saul?
ОтветитьI saw this today (Jan 21). I was not impressed.
The ISS or any space station should by their very nature be a great location for a claustrophobic thriller. However, in order for that to work things still have to be plausible, and I was immediately pulled out of the film when it became obvious that noone gave any thought to how the ISS operates.
The first was that there only appeared to be one Soyuz. As the crew cvehicles are also lifeboats, there must always be enough attached so everyone can evacuate. Even when they relocate vehicles to different ports, everyone assigned to that vehicle boards for the move. As there were six crew on board, there should be at least two Soyuz.
Speaking of, while the movie started filming (Feb 2021) concurrently with the beginning of crew Dragon launches, it's now been three years. They didn't adjust anything for the new vehicle?
There's no downtime. The crew works and sleeps in shifts, while in the movie everyone sleeps at the same time.
Every official crew member must have effective communication skills in both English and Russian. While that doesn't necessarily mean fluent, the number of times comments are made in the other language was rather implausible.
This is simplified, but the thruster explanation is also really wrong. The station does not lower its orbit when a vehicle docks. The station is massive compared to the vehicle, so basic physics (F=ma, a=F/m) would show how stupid that would be compared to moving the much lighter vehicle to the higher orbit. It would be especially stupid to lower the ISS to the point where atmospheric drag becomes a factor. The station is boosted to a higher orbit periodically by visiting cargo vehicles, but for docking at most the angle is changed so that the vehicles dock in a particular orientation (from the "front" of the orbit, I think).
Let's also not overlook that anyone who would be working on the ISS would know the protocols and station modules/nodes in advance and not have to have them explained!
I could go on, but generally speaking the movie has to ignore so much of how the ISS actually operates in order for the plot to work that I checked out fairly early on. The acting and cinematography were mostly fine, but this really needed to pass the script by someone with even a passing knowledge of ISS operations.
YOUR MOVIE PLEASE.
ОтветитьI went to go see this with a friend yesterday. She’s very picky about the movies that she likes so it was very difficult to find something that I thought both of us would like. And she still wasn’t a big fan of it but I enjoyed the movie. I thought it was pretty cool, and. I obviously cannot say much about the camera work, because as you know, I am totally blind, so there is that aspect.. that said, I thought it was a very gripping tail and one that is extremely cautionary and one that could’ve been avoided if they would’ve just communicated to one another. But then, if everybody was good at communication, we wouldn’t have movies.!
ОтветитьPut a chick in it and make her gay and lame. Since they had a good premise and he had a decent budget and they had a halfway decent cast it must have been really difficult to make it boring
ОтветитьThis movie gave me I.S.S. Irritable Space Syndrome
ОтветитьChris, “issssss” made me laugh far more than I probably should have
ОтветитьI just saw it.... kept me on the edge of my seat. Definitely recommend
ОтветитьOn a scale of 1-10 I give this movie a score of ZERO and that is me being very generous with that score.
no storyline, no plot, nothing but pure boredom. Everyone that is associated with this movie should be ASHAMED of themselves for making this TERD of a movie.
I got more enjoyment from a root canal than I did with this movie. Save your time and money and go watch paint dry, you will enjoy that more than this movie.
Since we know you only review films you like now, it’s safe to say that this isn’t one of those trash January films you described in the open.
ОтветитьThis came out this weekend and my local theater was showing Interstellar in imax so it made for a definitely interesting double feature 😂
ОтветитьCool shirt.
ОтветитьI enjoyed it.
ОтветитьI'm shocked that Chris reviewed a movie he didn't like.
ОтветитьYay, Killer Klownz From Outer Space shirt!
Now there's a B-movie that knows exactly what it is and has fun with it. And has some surprisingly good practical effects too.