QNED vs OLED vs QLED | What's the best TV tech in 2021?

Oled has faster response so gaming is good plus perfect blacks

Anybpdy else remember when those hige projector tvs were great.

We are spolied with 5v options nowadays. I remember when a basic hdtv was 5k when it first came out. Now you can get a great 65' for less then 500

OLED is still the king, LED technology is trying to catch up. However, there's no comparison for flexibility, the new folding tv from LG is the most expensive in the market and can only come from OLED tech.

Wow they're trying so hard to not pay the oled royalties

So, to sum it up. QNED and QLED are still built on the same old backlighting technology, only more and smaller backlighting than before. This means you will not have as crisp contrast as an OLED. Most notisable in dark/night scenes

You didn’t actually say anything about QNED vs QLED, you just said they’re closely competitive

No it didnt help clearing things up. This video basically said nothings that was "VS" just explaining the name and the tech.

Can anyone understand what this qtwat is even saying?

It’s STUped

What do you recommend for the anime lover uncle spurt?

The market is saturated with versions upon version. I’m overwhelmed by specs when I search online or walk into a store. Can you please advise? SAMSUNG has Qleds in A and B lines and 60, 80, 90’s I’m assuming the newer lines are indicated by the letter and so is the series? What’s better in the case of Q80A or Q60B?

Our Tv broke. Need one for MOVIE LOVERS please. Budget under $1000 as I intend on getting a sound bar. I read the 60B is for “casual movie lovers” and the color is off when sitting at an angle.

PLEASE help!

Ok, at first I didn’t understand why people made such a big deal about OLED, only because I’ve never owned OLED before in my life.

I was using the iPhone 8 Plus and after buying the iPhone 14 it soon took me by surprise. Don’t get me wrong, my dad owned a Galaxy Note 3 back in 2012 until he passed in 2020, and that phone had AMOLED… but I’ve only used it to play games and watch a bit of movies when I didn’t have a phone. I always knew it was great even with my 8 Plus but I never really looked at it in a broad way.

This OLED however is different from that AMOLED. I think this one is better but somehow the Note I believe is nicer. I haven’t compared them since I got this phone, but it’s super nice.. and lemme get into detail about it.

It’s soooo Vibrant, That’s obvious.. but there’s more. First thing I noticed from the change was the Backlight. When using LCD you can tell there’s backlight. When I glanced at the 12, 13, and 14.. you can tell there isn’t backlight. The display brightens up in a weird way and coming from LCD this technology seemed super ET.

The deeper blacks and the more vibrant colors really affect me till today. The 8 Plus always seemed bland and it’s insane. I feel like OLED is the best tech used in modern day and I don’t know any other that can overtake it.

(I said so much without saying much💀)

Everyone is saying qned but I've went to the store and have the opportunity to compare them, I'd say Oled > Qled by a small margin but QNed is actually bad. It has good color but I can litterally see the pixels up close. Qned is infant in its tech.

I have a C2 and I promise my 2019 Samsung Q60R looks just as good. No kidding. At all.

Can i ask why we are comparing modern tv's to LCD tv's in 2022

Wot about Qanon.

I bought the C9 when it came out in 2019 it's still the best of the best tvs I have ever owned to this day

Thanks Chris, simple and precise 👍

A 4K OLED TV can compete with an 8K QNED.

I still rocking a plasma. When I get a 4K big tv I’ll go qned. Wonder if Samsung makes them

I can’t get sky Q so I have opted for sky glass and I’m getting that delivered Friday which will replace my sky plus HD in my flat

Clear as mud

kind of made it more muddy bcoz just need a simple answer--which one to buy if you are looking for the best at an affordable price....

I closed the video when he said "tele box"
but I came back when he mentioned selling organs

240hz-360hz QNED gaming displays?

So actually you are not comparing shit. Got it!

I’m honestly sold on anything mini or micro LED after comparing my iPad’s mini LED to my OLED screen. They both produce amazing pictures but the mini LED can light up different parts of an image simultaneously, bringing the whole image into focus and thereby into life. Whereas the OLED can only manage to bring only specific parts of an image into focus. Mini LED is obviously also better at showing greater detail thanks to those tiny light emitting diodes, and the sheer number of them concentrated into the same space as OLED TVs. Can’t wait to see what micro LED looks like. Or micro OLED.

WHICH ONE DO I GET FOR SPORTS ONLY THEN??? PLEASE HELP!!!

Samsung QNED is different tech. Just a heads up.

I am loving my 75" LG 75QNED99UPA. I've never had an OLED, but this TV is excellent. The black's are deep, the colors natural and not over saturated. Just a great panel IMO.

Good information, but have the actual TVs side by side so we can actually see the difference. Thank you for the review.

This is to confusing, I'm going to Qbed

Very useful video! Thanks a lot! QNED looks the best. :)

Hello from Germany ☕ Are here people from Germany to write in germsn? I thought QNEDs are LCDs.

My Christmas present drone took off and flew into my faithful Sammy U65 F8000.
I had never made a home insurance claim before even though I’ve been with the same company for 20 years and broken a lot of expensive stuff over the years. As it cost £3500 in 2014 I though I would make an initial enquirey and see if they could fix it or with luck find one that might of been sitting in a wharehouse gathering dust as I was still perfectly happy with its performance & picture (just not the crude phallic looking image complete with balls that the drone tore into the top layer of the screen).

I was pretty shocked to be offered insurance an ‘equivalent’ tv for £1200, it was a mid range Sony made of cheap looking plastic with a massive back sticking out and just not ‘premium’ looking.
I rejected it straight off & after they wouldn’t initially back down started a dispute; certain features on flagship TVs never work their way down to cheaper models regardless of the TVs age, for me the ultra slim depth & screen bezel, metal side bezel, non-reflective screen & 10P white balance was essential, they all come with fancy remotes too. My tv had hand gesture control as well as voice control which is normal now with but was a major premium feature at the time. Most important of all was a set that could use Samsung’s no-gap wall mount which makes the TV hang completely flush against the wall & normally only available on a the top and second from top model.

After multiple conversations and trying to explain that flagship models have features that don’t change over time and having dug my heals in they offered me £1799 for the Q90T, their ‘independant’ assesor insisted that Samsung no longer made a tv thst was 3cm deep or had a model that could use a no-gap wall mount.

I called Samsung for advice & they told me the flagship 4 & 8K models did have these features so after another two weeks of disagreement, walking an underwriter click by click through the CurrysPCWorld website (which the independant assesor uses to compare models) & then cross referencing with the Samsung website (as well as enquiring if my extra legal cover could be used to pay for costs if I decided to challenge their descision in court) we started to understand where each orher was coming from.

They finally agreed to match my tv with the Q95T; £1999 plus £250 compensation for incorrectly assessing the TVs (my premium will now probably go through the roof when it’s up for renewal though).

From what I can make out the 2021 Samsung 4 & 8k flagship TVs are identical to the next models down apart from accommodating the no-gap wall mount & hence having one connect boxes, that alone is £300 and the wall mount is another £200. So if I stick with a Samsung set it looks like I’ll still need to find an extra 2 to £3000 because I’ll have to go up to an 85” for the same wow factor a 65” had in 2014.

I almost went out and bought the 2020 model as soon as the money came through but fortunately read up on the soon to be released 2021 models with the micro LED backlighting (now I’m reading up on the 2022 sets based on quantum dot OLEDs, another huge leap forward over the

I was actually really happy with my 1080tv, I had it calibrated when I got it and I suppose because I’ve not been spoilt with HDR, Dolby vision etc love the picture especially the 3D functionality, solely used for watching well made classic 3D films on BluRay.

I have to say I was quite upset with how they assess TVs though. Of course a 2013/14 1080 tv looses a lot of value over 6 years and all TVs seem to be a minimum of 4K now. 65” is pretty standard too so you could say a £600 4K tv is an upgrade over any 1080 model.

With a lot of perseverance my argument that the esthetics of the flagship models is timeless and their design even when they’re turned off is really eye catching & doesn’t change over time did win out in the end but it was harder work on Han it should of been.

Now I just have to pick a new TV. My eyes aren’t as good as they use to be so I don’t see the point of an 8K tv. I had convinced myself even 4K wouldn’t be noticeable over my trusted F8000 but going up to 85” 4K makes more sense.
8K on the other hand.. I can’t see content being available probably untill full LED array displays are common in another 6 or so years so may as well wait. Also streaming 8K over WiFi could be problematic, even with a wide connection and an unshared 5g channel could be problematic so the 8K set should be off the table but...Samsung’s 2021 8K flagship model the QN950A has a completely bezel-less screen which looks stunning -course the identical 4K model (QN95A) has a small (but still noticeable bezel). The price difference is rediculous, I would never have considered spending out that sort of money and would have just settled with the 4K model and just been envious of the 8K version but in the back of my head I know the insurance money is pretty much the price difference between the two models so it does (using warped logic of a gadget freak) make the 8K set just about obtainable just not reasonable and definitely not value for money.

Any opinions or suggestions on what you might do would be much appreciated.

A 77” LG 4K LG G1 vs a Samsung 75” 8K Neo QLED QN900A? Which do you think would be better for someone who isn’t paranoid about screen burn in, will have the TV in a room that is fairly bright most of the time, has access to 8K content, but can only buy one or the other?

Well done for explaining Chris, remember not the 9o`clock news? What do I do with my old 78s

Chris could be a good science teacher. Imagine he is teaching science lesson in the class, and the laughter of every kid being so enjoyable on their science lesson

I love homes under the hammer hahaha 👍

Homes Under The Hammer 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

Oled is the best of the best !

Yeah the difference is price. Buy a $400 hdtv and you'll be happy. You don't need opleqefhd

REVIEW THE NEWEST MOROEOLA EDGE S WITH DIMENSITY 870 BROTHER!!!

neither is the best

Why?.... Pointless... Most streaming media won't have the bandwidth. Computers and laptop screens will be the same pointless! So who are they for? A person who lives next to a data centre? Not going to sell many at those prices if they exist at all...

I only watch old repeats of Bullseye, will they look any better ?..."and this is what you could of won a 60" QNED Telly"

Had a LG CX for 3.5 weeks and got burn in down in the bottom left hand of the screen :(. The HUD from Red Dead Redemption 2 did the burn in. Only had 49 hours on the LG also. So the tv store switched me into a Samsung Q90T and the brightness difference is massive. The LG was kinda dark in my medium lit room. And the colours on the 90T are nice and vibrant. I’m wondering if I should of waited for the Samsung QN90A micro led. But I also don’t wanna piss the store off and exchange this tv too. What would you guys do... any advise here?

Unfortunately, the better and thinner the screens get, the shitter the sound gets without additional speakers. I would hazard a guess that only 20%of families have additional speakers etc, which leaves most of us getting a generally quite poor sound experience.