Тэги:
#ai_music #ai_music_generator #suno_ai #udio_ai #mureka_ai #ai_song_generator #free_ai_music_generator #ai_music_tutorial #best_ai_music_generator #suno_ai_music #ai_music_production #text_to_music #ai_song #ai_song_tutorial #ai_music_generation_tutorial #ai_music_production_tutorial #make_full_song_with_ai #how_to_make_full_song_with_ai #how_to_monetize_ai_music #suno_vs_udio #udio_ai_music #free_ai_music #free_ai_music_maker #ai_music_maker #how_to_create_ai_musicКомментарии:
nice to have one more open chrome tab with ai generator to play with. As for now mureka is sounds mostly like suno v2 plus some artifacts on voice, cyryllic slavic languages do not sing correctly at all, some melodies sounds like if there were applied low quality stretching filter in Reaper Daw, voices sounds like advanced vocaloid. There is no melodic in generations to achieve melodicness you have to hum your own.
ОтветитьUDdio still kicking ass
Ответитьyou can create only 6 songs in mureka while you can create 10 songs in suno
ОтветитьComplete trash, sorry 😂
ОтветитьNot for me, here one seems to sound like the other... But maybe it's because of the crappy input 😄
ОтветитьVALEU OBRIGADO PELA DICA,EU AINDA NÃO CONHECIA ESTA
ОтветитьI uploaded a reference tune, selected my 30 seconds and everything else and hit 'Done' then I sat there for 10 minutes while it did nothing, my browser telling me the page is unresponsive. I guess lots of people are trying it and slowing it down. Maybe I'll try again in a few weeks.
ОтветитьThat copyright certificate they give you is a gimmick. It's a useless feature. It basically says that they claim no ownership of the content you create--which is the same at Udio, where it's stated in the TOS. That's all that's needed, really--a certificate doesn't do squat. And that's because no private company has the authority to issue anyone copyrights to anything.
Also, I'd be incredibly surprised to find out that their little user market is active even to a small degree. Why would a user purchase a license to use another user's output, when they could just generate it themselves? Keep in mind too that if you sell some user that big ticket exclusive license, you cannot use that content for anything of your own--because you sold it to them. If someone wants to buy that license from you for $30, when they could just as easily generate something similar, you might be better off holding on to it. If you happen to generate something that's actually marketable, 30 bucks is not enough for an exclusive license. Don't sell yourself short..
It's funny how all these websites have the same basic format (picking genres, using the same AI prompts... generating 2 results per song... able to extend the song, etc... would it be wrong to question whether the same people are running these websites?
ОтветитьLol, sorry but this is not even gonna catch a cold, much less a userbase. Maybe if it was a good model
Ответитьnice but only English Songs I think I tried for Hindi and it get failed.
ОтветитьBetter than SUNO?! 🤔 I'm not believe... This is impossible.
Ответитьi can't extend di mureka...must pay ?
Ответитьthis is shit compared to udio / suno
ОтветитьVocal like a robot ! NOOOOO !
ОтветитьSeems now Suno AI is still the best 🤞🏻
ОтветитьUdio is really difficult to replicate the same genre and artist, but the quality is phenomenal. I have many songs from SUNO with the same genre and artist, but the quality, oh god... I need to try this Mureka AI.
Ответитьudio/suno ai is significantly better than this mureka. most Sponsored Videos are not honest. save your money and buy a udio/suno ai that does better quality
ОтветитьExtend feature doesn´t work... I tried in Chrome and Safari and I can´t drag the edge of the extend section...
Ответитьomg the vocal motif thing made me jizz in my pants, i mean that feature is literally a knock out punch, the final stone in the gauntlet of the talentless thanoses such as myself. i mean now anyone with a talent for melody writing, sound selection etc now has all the tools they need to create the entire with zero technical skills. what a fooking time to be alive. i hope udio adds that! udio is the best out of all of them, it can really mix and match genres which makes it top tier for experimentation and true artistic ingenuity.
ОтветитьTried it with my song and is absolute junk. Good melodic quality but on metal it sounds like a low quality midi keyboard you buy for 3 years old kid. No guitars,, no life in it at all.
ОтветитьNON restituisce dowlander in MP4 ???
ОтветитьI can't get past the Suno Distortion. It ruined it for me. It sounds like an 8 bit 22khz or lower. In the future they are getting better. My guess is after the law suit is settled, they will release v4. I noticed that before the law suit, I was generating a good song every 5 trys.... Some were good enough, I reworked them and released them. Lately it just isn't "there" like they turned the computer power down. I wonder if it's also pure server volume. Because there are so many users each generation gets less attention....IDK, just speculation.....
ОтветитьThey even cloned the user interface of udio
ОтветитьI tried Mureka , this website must be a joke? Is it possible to get anything resembling a song performance in it? Just for fun, for kids.
ОтветитьFirst time user with ai generator and i used mureka and it was a great song he made I wanted.
ОтветитьMureka is not transparent I am totally disappointed with their service after subscribing for the basic plans, most of the packages which were in the basic plan, they shifted them to pro-plan, in the basic they don't give you wav files only mp3, I feel disappointed
ОтветитьI tried udio after using suno and man.... That shit sucked in comparison. Maybe i just need to mess with it more
Ответитьcan we upload our own beat in it?
ОтветитьI found it to be very limiting compared to other services and to use the best features like reference audio it's going to cost $288/yr. Not interested
ОтветитьCan those apps generate good quality pronunciation if lyrics are written on different languages? Which is the best?
Ответитьwhile there’s no denying that Mureka has some undeniably useful features, the vocal quality is kind of “iffy”. Suno does produce better sounding songs, Udio has a better accuracy at reproducing the genre you want. I think most musicians would appreciate Udio most.
ОтветитьSuno is crap in instrumental composition, and u can't refer any artist, while in udio u can. I want to try this mureka
ОтветитьOk tried, it's really terrible... Che cagata 😢, prompt adherence 0! I said to create a retrowave track with guitars... And it did a disco 80s track without guitar 😭😭
ОтветитьCan I clone my voice on this platform? Then, can I use my cloned voice on a song I generated on Mureka?
Ответитьmureka is ass
ОтветитьFrom their rules it seems that Mureka reserves all rights to exploit the created song, without recognizing any royalties to the user. Practically the user is the owner of the copyright but at the same time Mureka reserves the right to exploit, royalty free, in every area, for life and with the right to transfer to third parties. Even with the paid plan. If I understand correctly, this aspect is worrying. Suno, for example, recognizes full ownership of the rights to the user only. Too bad, it seems to be an excellent tool.
ОтветитьPlease don't be fooled by this software. It is not easy to use, the effect is not as expected, the processing speed is slow, and the customer service does not respond, and there is no refund mechanism. It feels like a subscription scam.
Ответитьbullshit, only mp3 for 9 $....Kindergarden
Ответитьudio is much beter
ОтветитьMureka is not better than Suno. Mureka $8 but only 400 credit. Suno has better sounds quality and cheaper $10 for 2500 credit.
ОтветитьWaste
Ответить