Комментарии:
100% reality.
ОтветитьThey were Hurrians ,And If semitic Assyrians captured Iranian plateau.The Hurrians escaped to India.The Indians cannot pronounce "Hurrian, therefore, They called them Arians
ОтветитьThere is zero evidence of Aryan invasion. No DNA, no euro horses, no euro chariots, no signs of invasion. See David Frawley, Abhijit Chanda, TRS clips to hear from real archeologists.
ОтветитьThere not white by accident. 😂
ОтветитьDull subject. All people are originated from the Rift valley, Africa. That's it.
ОтветитьAS a scholar in history i have read this topic in detail during my phd days // the truth is somewhere in middle //
1 to assume that no aryan came to india is wrong , there were waves of migration in india from steppes , iran etc //even dravidians are migrants from zagros mountains of iran.
2 to equate it with alexander like invasion is also extremely biased ,, because if invasion had happened you will find broken/cracked bones and injury marks on the skeletons or mass burials // the excavations have not shown anything like this // the skeletons are in good shape and show no injury marks // further these skeletons have pottery buried with them which proves these were traditional burials .
3 i very respectfully want to say that there was a clear policy to divide natives by brits not only in india but also in africa and middle east,, they followed this policy [ the wars in africa and middle east are a direct outcome of those policies ] so yeah some sort of propaganda is definitely involved here as well
but past is past lets move on now and create a better world 💓💓
I love this STJ guy. He's spewing facts.
ОтветитьYour video is totally accurate
My mum is north Indian and my dads south indian and this theory has always made sense to me
Amazing video
Punjabis & rajputs, and any light skin warriors in South Asia have the indo aryan genes
ОтветитьDon't believe this crap. The most successful haplogroup is R1A1 which is originating from R1A*. This later went to the Yamnaya Group which then invaded Europe. The R1A came from F which is also prevalent in India and F came from C which is most common among South Indians. So technically, Africans came to India, one settled in middle South, one group went East, one group then moved north and they mutated slowly to the weather which gave them lighter skin and lighter haircolor and then one offshoot started living in the mountains of north developing another mutation, then these went to Central Asia, from Central Asia to the West to Europe.
ОтветитьIts that, once upon a time, upper castes were in total control of indian polity, lower caste not educated had no significant voice, and upper caste believed the AIT fully to justify their control.
Now, after the british rule, and more after the independence, lower castes get educated, and got access the knowledge from all over the world.
And in established democracy which is the function of demography, starting to realize, they have the chance.
And thus after some instance of "Aryans go back". Upper Caste/ Hindu nationalist are hell bent on proving the AIT, AMT are false and a western plot.
They are still casteist by the way.
That's interesting. Yes, we had some friends from some part of Northern India and they would be best described as 'Caucasian' if I had to say. Actually they had dark brown hair and eyes but what you'd call thin features, long nose, the classic Euro skull shapes, lips etc. But later we learned they were English via the recent colonizing phase of India. So I don't know.
ОтветитьAll Aryans belong to Europe, South Asia for Dravidians only.
ОтветитьBrahmin= Aryan who have occupied holy Dravidian land, and must be deported.
ОтветитьGreat video! 👏🏻
ОтветитьGood one
ОтветитьJATS ,KHATRIS, BUMIHAAR BRAHMIN, GUJJARS,RAJPUTS, ROR MARATHA,BISHNOI, PATHAN(PASHTUN),KAPOORS,BHATS, MEVATI,
THESE ARE MODERN INDO ARYAN
OF north india🥛⚡⚔️
🔅 Update 2023 December 🔅
Researchers from Deccan College Pune along with the Central Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) have established that human remains discovered at an ancient site of Rakhigarhi – a village in the Hisar district of Haryana – date back around 8,000 years. The discovery has been made during the third phase of excavations carried out by the ASI along with various teams across the country, including researchers from Deccan College Pune.
____
The first phase of excavations at Rakhigarhi was carried out by Dr Amarendra Nath of the Indian Archaeology Department from 1997 to 2000 during which evidence of the North Harappan culture dating back to 2500 BC was found. The second phase of excavations at Rakhi Garhi was carried out by professor Vasant Shinde from Deccan College Pune from 2006 to 2013 during which Shinde’s team collected evidence and conducted DNA tests to establish that this culture could be over 4,000 years’ old. Over the past two years, the ASI and Deccan College Pune have jointly carried out the third phase of excavations at Rakhigarhi through a team led by ASI joint director Sanjay Kumar Manjul and Deccan College Pune assistant professor Prabhodh Shirwalkar.
_______
Shirwalkar said, “There are three parts to the Harappan culture; East Harappan, Middle Harappan, and North Harappan (Modern). The earlier two excavations found evidence of the Middle and Modern Harappan cultures dating back around 4,000 years. But now, the evidence found in the third phase of excavations shows that the culture dates back 7,000 to 8,000 years. The final report of the work is being prepared by our team.”
Shirwalkar said that the research on this will continue for many more months. “Human ‘DNA’ has remained the same for 8,000 years which we have found during our research. When human traps were found here, they were thoroughly tested. Scientists have drawn conclusions based on this. A large burial ground was found here and it had human traps as well as animal traps,” Shirwalkar said.
__________
The ASI is actively involved in excavations at the Rakhigarhi archaeological site, and the primary goal of these excavations, according to Ajay Yadav, additional director-general of the ASI, is to make the site accessible to the public. This involves exposing and conserving the structural remains for future viewing and providing amenities for visitors.
About utensils of various metals including gold and silver found during the excavation, Shirwalkar said that old silver and copper ornaments, too, have been found. “The most beautiful are the clay pots. A dinner set from that period has been found,” Shirwalkar said.
“We think that the words bedroom and kitchen are of recent origin. Whereas in Rakhigarhi, an even larger settlement of the largest ancient houses ever was found underground. A courtyard and a drainage system were also found in it. There were two to six- bedroom houses that were also available at that time. The clothing fashion of the people of that time is also known. A colourful worn piece of cloth, a shawl and skirt were also found,” he said.
____________
“This research has found strong evidence that the Harappan civilisation is 7,000 to 8,000 years old. Scientists from the department of archaeology of India and Deccan College have worked together on the project. It is agreed that there was human habitation or civilisation in our country 8,000 years ago. The evidence shows that the people of that time were as advanced as they are today,” said Shirwalkar.
Earlier this year, union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman had highlighted Rakhigarhi in her budget speech of 2023, emphasising on the development of five iconic sites of archaeological significance, including Rakhigarhi, with on-site museums. The plan is to showcase the antiquities uncovered at Rakhigarhi, now considered the largest Harappan site spanning 350 acres, in an under-construction museum near the site. The museum is estimated to be worth ₹23 crores.
sirs do not poo in the loo
ОтветитьI don t accept the fact that Aryans are associated with DNA evidence. For someone who has studied Metaphysics and Comparative Religious studies, it has little to do with people of a certain culture. Still, more do with a shift of prevailing ideas that have managed to blend into other pre-existing ancient religious systems and customs, which later contributed to a shift of consciousness, towards a new spiritual movement that has managed to propagate a Nobler way of conducting oneself internally.
ОтветитьI have a suggestion for a future video. You could probably make a video where you go more in depth into the Indo-Aryans and their culture. I remember reading about this group in Anatolia, called the Mitanni, there were very similar to the Indo-Aryans, or something like that. Maybe you could talk about them. You might piss off some Hindu nationalists, but their opinion is insignificant.
ОтветитьNah brah they just dropped out of the sky in India one day.
Ответитьwe pushtow people from Afghanistan another word Aryan come from India then why they have blue eyes and blond hair ?
ОтветитьYou cannot trust anything that comes out of India, it's mostly influenced by modern political ideology.
It has to be evaluated multiple times before accepting it as credible.
Yet another effort by westerners and western historians to falsely supplant the idea that....the indic..aryan and sanathan culture was non indian in origin....'Vedas' are older than antiquity...they were written much much later...because the vocal invocations and frequencies of 'Vedas' were sound energy healings and hence needed to be verbally memorised generation after generation.
ОтветитьThe people who don't believe this therory are Hindu Nationalists. The irony is that most of these people's ancestors where probably part of this invasion. Most North West Indians would have DNA that originates from this group of people
Every country has been invaded. Deal with it. Nothing to be ashamed off. Embrace it
If Indo Aryan theory is true then the Migrated Europeans learnt the Ancient Indian Cultures and spread that throughout Europe
I don't trust History written or recorded by Europeans just like westerners don't like History claims without written records and proofs
There was migration in both sides
People went from india to Europe and people from Europe to india
No one is convincing me that the White Europeans Developed the Sanskrit language and The Vedas
They don't even come close to pronounce the Sanskrit language properly
Sanskrit language pronunciation also describes the Object or Thing it is implies
The Europeans and indians both pronounce it differently
only iranian are aryan.aryan are difrent with indo auropian.abaot 4000 years iranian coll them self aryan.
ОтветитьI’d prefer funk music and soul music. Not that square farmer stuff.
ОтветитьThis is what I was taught in school
Aryans come from the North Eastern Steppe
And they invaded India or rather moved in,
The native indus people didn't really resist, Warriors had been reduced to something symbolic in their culture
I started hearing this other BS around the same time they started claiming that Anglo-Saxon culture was diffusion rather than invasion
Theres an ancient jewish grave site found in india.
Judaism during indus Valley may have records of traveling through there.
Brother, ignore all the hate comments from indians,i am an indian & i found your video extremely informative,good thing is that many indians have now starting to acknowledge this fact(including myself) & are taking pride in their aryan blood!
Best wishes to you!
This is why all europeans should study the Vedic Philosophy. It also can help them understand the teachings of Christ more deeply when viewed from Vedic standpoint
ОтветитьKudos! Excellent production and easy to follow.
ОтветитьThank you for the very precise information. Please post updates on this topic if you have any.
ОтветитьThis same thing is what the AHnenerbe of Himmler's SS looked into. They found lots of evidence to show Aryans were in China/Tibet and the surrounding areas. Even the Holy land needs to be questioned as the ancient Israelite's might have more in common with Aryans than what we have been led to believe.
ОтветитьRelated yes, BUT WHICH WAY DID IT FLOW? WHICH CULTURE CAME FIRST. PROVE THAT FIRST. STOP PROMOTING AIT.
ОтветитьGenetic studies have shown that the people of India have a complex genetic heritage, with contributions from both indigenous and Eurasian populations. There is no evidence of a large-scale migration of people from Central Asia into India around the time of the supposed Aryan invasion.
ОтветитьThe Aryan invasion theory, which proposed that a group of light-skinned, Indo-European-speaking people called Aryans invaded India from Central Asia around 1500 BCE, is no longer widely accepted by scholars. This theory was first proposed in the 19th century by European scholars who were trying to explain the origins of the Indo-European language family. They believed that the Aryans were a superior race who brought civilization to India when they conquered the native dark-skinned Dravidian people
ОтветитьThanks! Good Job!!!!!!
ОтветитьI am from the United States, but my parents are from Telangana. Did Aryan genetic influence reach that far down in the subcontinent? Also, I read a post on Twitter which basically said that the Hindu “Holy Book” had a hatred towards non-aryans, Is this true, and what might that say about me and my faith in a religion that hates me.
ОтветитьI agree with everything up until the part where it was a violent migration.
ОтветитьAlso why only consider human DNA what about horses?
To travel such large distance horses would be needed. And to cover such large distance halter as well saddle would be required otherwise no rider could travel such large distance forget about the group travelling.
Oldest known saddle is around 727-396 BC. Why ignore that?
And Aryans never reached china and east asia because they were kicked out.
ОтветитьThere were arians in India, though it wasnot invasion. India large. Numbers of arians small.
Ответить