Stalin, Small Business and Socialism

I think Lenin called them as middle peasants instead of petty bourgeoisie, since no labor is bein exploited in this business.

Does onlyfans count as petty bourgeoisie?

Poor fools….The only people who want this are either lazy, uneducated, or live in socialist states like California where, ironically, the cost of living and taxes are so high you think capitalism has failed you and more socialism will save you.

In reality, it costs so much to live in your liberal state because they charge you so much to fund socialist endeavors you as a society never see the benefits of since the funds never actually go towards what they say it will because of corruption.

Socialism/communism is a cool story, but corruption and imperfect people will never see it to fruition. The only states who implement socialist ideas and support it are states with the worst in homelessness, unemployment and wage to cost of living ratios.

VIVA USSR!

Comrade what ideological camp do you sit? And, are you a member of a party?

Gran video, complimenti! ✊🏻🚩

Outstanding video! You explain Marxist thought so well. You deserve more subscribers.

✊✊🚩

I hate them

Done a video discussing the Holodomor yet?

All economic activity MUST be under the direct ownership&control of the central economic planning committee!!This is the solid bedrock of modern socialism.Anyone who disagrees is an enemy of the state!

Immediately subscribed. This is extremely well put together content!

Would the petty-bourgeoisie be better described as members of the growing precariot under neoliberalism?

Socialist male grindset: start a small business under socialism

Self employed people are not part of the p-bourg, they are self employed proletariat, Marx goes into detail about this, as he claims "they are their own wage labourers" After all, they have to subordinate their labour to the market. A small difference but of relevance as they are differences in their social role and their ideology.

👍👍👍

We either all become rich or stay equally poor

great video about kolkhoz farms, comrade.
collective farms were a great solution, but i heard that there were problems with the collectivization of the farms in yugoslavia. is it maybe because before the bolsheviks came to power in usssr, the peasants were serfs and didn't own the land, but the tzar did? so it was easier for them to want and accept this kind of deal with collective farming unlike the yugoslav peasants who owned their land, small-scale, but still, and didn't want to relinquish ownership? and what are we going to do about it in the future?