The Poetry of Science: Richard Dawkins and Neil deGrasse Tyson

The Poetry of Science: Richard Dawkins and Neil deGrasse Tyson

2,546,398 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

Edward Gatey
Edward Gatey - 24.09.2023 22:14

Yes, USA rebilikkkan's are antiscience! Coz of the great redeemer. Start owning themseves. Liars! Everyone one of them selves are liars.

Ответить
Edward Gatey
Edward Gatey - 24.09.2023 21:51

Cell phone companies eat this shit up. I mostly ignore my minicomputer. Their entire intent is to sell $1000 phones attended 24/7. And charge ridiculous fees for their use.

Ответить
Edward Gatey
Edward Gatey - 24.09.2023 21:39

Yep, you just started. Riveting! Need 2 more hours of this

Ответить
Edward Gatey
Edward Gatey - 24.09.2023 21:25

Silicon-based life = grass. Its why you mower blades need fequent sharpening. And, exhalation = CO2, a gas, SiO2 is a solid. Considering the extemophiles on earth, it seems unlekely to fong silicon-based life.

Ответить
Russell Haikney
Russell Haikney - 23.09.2023 16:33

At around 34.50 ..Dawkins states life is a highly implausible event ..then he is actually admitting it must come ftom a higher power ie a Creator??
Just shot himself in the foot

Ответить
JR JR
JR JR - 18.09.2023 23:13

Aren't all scientists philosophers at the beginning of their lives who get pushed and encouraged to get into a lab and become scientists? perhaps those philosophers were not motivated enough!

Ответить
JR JR
JR JR - 18.09.2023 22:53

Why is Dawkins talking about DNA when we are all different because of the genes turned on and off within our DNA? how many genes do we have and how many different combinations can we come up with in order to see that we are all different, isn't it true that we could reach the sun if we wrote the genome in books and stockpiled one on top of each other?

Ответить
Michelangelo Pe
Michelangelo Pe - 16.09.2023 05:20

The question that atheists can't answer and don't dare to ask is "is atheism a logical fallacy?". The most important, urgent and forbidden question is "is atheism a logical fallacy?". No atheist will ever ask "is atheism a logical fallacy?". I am not asking you to believe me, only to pay attention to discover the truth for yourself. The greatest knowledge of all time, that is going unnoticed, censored and not understood, is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. I am a psychologist and I want to know what do you understand when I say "to end the war in Ukraine the discovery that atheism is a logical fallacy has to be news". I am a poet that writes prose to be understood better, all my work is poetry. I can only speak in a human language to be understood. To understand atheism is a logical fallacy you have to understand why the most emblematic remark of atheism is "who created god?", with the intelligent creator of the universe written in lower case.

Ответить
Mizzou72
Mizzou72 - 15.09.2023 15:50

God created the heavens and the earth. As a scientist, I always find it interesting that man's ego, his relentless desire to elevate his perceptions and observations above God, calling it science. Most modern science repudiates true science and the scientific method and calls theory truth.

Ответить
np
np - 15.09.2023 09:32

Tyson is the worst interviewer of all time. Nobody wants to listen to him and he let nobody speak. What a waste of interview

Ответить
dylan scronce
dylan scronce - 13.09.2023 12:57

If a planet is within the habitable zone of its star. Why wouldn't the things that evolve there be just like here? I think it would be exactly the same. Unless they didnt have a giant meteor wipe out their dinosaurs.. I feel like a TON of planets out there are just full of dinosaurs

Ответить
gan shrio
gan shrio - 13.09.2023 12:10

SCIENCE IS THE FUTURE!

Ответить
ઋદ્રી Creations
ઋદ્રી Creations - 12.09.2023 11:55

Brilliant conversation. Looking forward for many more such intellectual talks. Thank you

Ответить
Michelle Louise Davis GUITAR SONGS
Michelle Louise Davis GUITAR SONGS - 11.09.2023 17:37

shut up niel

Ответить
Mary Ann Breen
Mary Ann Breen - 09.09.2023 23:43

If only we were listening to science, the world would be a more beautiful and safe place to live.

Ответить
Emron Oli
Emron Oli - 08.09.2023 09:05

Science must remain Science, and it must not turn into philosophy.

Ответить
Robert Paskulovich
Robert Paskulovich - 31.08.2023 10:55

“The #1 problem on earth is human adults.”

Ответить
Holger Krauß
Holger Krauß - 30.08.2023 14:26

Ob diese beiden Idioten wohl bei Satan in der Hölle einen besonderen Platz einnehmen ? Man mag es bezweifeln.

Ответить
Jojo990
Jojo990 - 29.08.2023 19:30

Yea

Ответить
Vivette
Vivette - 29.08.2023 19:00

Interesting that

Ответить
Patrick Karnwie
Patrick Karnwie - 27.08.2023 04:25

Word of God made the world with words. If the universe language is math then the word of God beyond powerful for it controls the words of mathematics
A

Ответить
Glint369 XGN
Glint369 XGN - 26.08.2023 08:47

You two should work together because it is very important for us humans. Otherwise, more people who can participate in such collaborations. We are part of our Galaxy. All laws that exist in we are part of Galaxy, we live in and all laws and regulations apply to us as well. We must always remember the Quantuim of Words, Laws, Ideas.
Albert Einstein's space and time tell us. About We are occupying space. We cannot macth it hour, and second.

Ответить
James Daniels
James Daniels - 26.08.2023 03:37

And Jesus, said ' Two taco's on Tuesday 'On Friday fish taco '
Jesus makes great fish tacos with the hottest 🥵 hot sauce!'

Ответить
a1612
a1612 - 26.08.2023 03:18

so you have an interesting discussion about science in many different and interesting perspectives and then you have a jackass asking the last irrelevant and ridiculous theistic gotcha type question that nobody cares about

Ответить
Luk Natu
Luk Natu - 26.08.2023 00:50

Mister Richard Dawkins, you are the reason why i started learning english. I just wanted to know what you are talking about. I love biology and now i can understand almost everything you say...thank you for changing my life. Greetins from Slovakia 🙂💚

Ответить
Alex Pages
Alex Pages - 25.08.2023 04:51

I was here August 24th 2023

Ответить
Punished Madotsuki
Punished Madotsuki - 24.08.2023 08:23

Neil humbled Richard... if they were to debate i think richard would tap out even if Neil tried to advocate for religion.

Ответить
zandre007
zandre007 - 22.08.2023 20:16

so nice to see people lining up for science purposes- not Taylor Swift concert.

Ответить
William Peterson
William Peterson - 22.08.2023 18:56

“We are not fallen angels, but risen apes” Dr. Andy Thompson

Ответить
میل لنگ زنگ زده. زورخانه قزوین
میل لنگ زنگ زده. زورخانه قزوین - 22.08.2023 01:43

Mr. Richard Dawkins, as a militaristic atheist, you will never be able to adopt the beauty of the mysticism of the world religions into science by getting creative and calling your shows “the poetry of science”. It’s absurd! Your shows are anything but poetry. Your attempts are quite unscientific!

Ответить
Romli Ahmadabdulnadzir
Romli Ahmadabdulnadzir - 20.08.2023 14:56

Constantly realizing that while we have sensors connected to neurons etc., our biology connects neurons to the brain as a screen that reflects the real thing. However, human pilots have shields separating them from reality, which can be seen through cockpit windows and many sensor gauges. You are a human being and a vehicle for birth and death, however, you are involuntary, which means birth, death and reincarnation (if any). It really is your right to believe it or not. Your understand reality is fundamental.

Ответить
john smith
john smith - 20.08.2023 09:48

That was really good

Ответить
Inter Linked
Inter Linked - 20.08.2023 01:50

NDG is such a blagger. He must suffer imposter syndrome. So many words, so little said.

Ответить
a d
a d - 18.08.2023 09:52

Too many interesting topics things I’ve pondered myself and these two giving their insights. It’s a joy.

Ответить
Kenneth Katz
Kenneth Katz - 17.08.2023 14:24

What you must remember is that the original EM made and labeled in the 1890s is still used today. This is wrong because today's is not the same labels as 1890. Why they do not fix this is a wonder. Another example is that the computer decided to use the 1800s keyboard typewriter in now's computers. Kids today wonder.

Ответить
Frank M
Frank M - 16.08.2023 23:39

Prof Dawkins is a master of his craft, demonstrating wisdom. Hopefully, astrophysicist Tyson reflected of this discourse and gleaned insight…that less can be more… .

Ответить
conillet
conillet - 15.08.2023 06:53

Neil deGrasse Tyson says many interesting things, but ultimately comes across as mildly annoying. Basically, he's a bit too full of himself. You DO NOT interrupt or talk over Richard Dawkins!

Ответить
Sanatani
Sanatani - 13.08.2023 08:42

The only problem is neil was cutting off Dr. Richard at many points.

Ответить
Matthew Gale
Matthew Gale - 12.08.2023 11:17

There's a point the black guy goes too far or he was just getting giddy with it
Very unprofessional.

Ответить
funlover1977
funlover1977 - 11.08.2023 23:00

Have Dawkins ever met Sagan face to face? Imagine them combined in a debate.

Ответить
Bret Loomis
Bret Loomis - 10.08.2023 20:05

NLT'S OF Possible LIFE on is baloney. we have NO CLUE HOW LIFE BEGINSNevery claim we do is false

Ответить
محمد نعیم جهانشاهی
محمد نعیم جهانشاهی - 08.08.2023 15:40

I loved it when Tyson said you're not justified to trust senses 🤩

Ответить
Brett Noad
Brett Noad - 06.08.2023 22:29

God I would love for Neil to stop interrupting so much. This was 12 years ago and if you’ve seen “startalk” lately it’s clear he hasn’t changed… as much as I’d love to pick his brain I’m afraid I’d barely get a word in

Ответить
Freddy Garcia
Freddy Garcia - 05.08.2023 06:24

49' Dawkins accepts being short-sighted by blaming his colleague.

Ответить
Freddy Garcia
Freddy Garcia - 05.08.2023 06:17

43' Still generalizing taking the Earth as a model. It seems that we are still under the Ptolemaic system. Is it a self-protective attitude? We always pretend to be the center of the universe no matter what!

Ответить
Freddy Garcia
Freddy Garcia - 05.08.2023 05:56

33' What if Silicon-based life exists? the same way that it took billions of years for the Earth to have Carbon-based life forms. We tend to generalize, to establish paths in function of our egocentric Carbon based biological origins. Maybe there is "something else" that we cannot even detect with our conventional way of perception-enhancing devices.

Ответить