Комментарии:
Yes, USA rebilikkkan's are antiscience! Coz of the great redeemer. Start owning themseves. Liars! Everyone one of them selves are liars.
ОтветитьCell phone companies eat this shit up. I mostly ignore my minicomputer. Their entire intent is to sell $1000 phones attended 24/7. And charge ridiculous fees for their use.
ОтветитьYep, you just started. Riveting! Need 2 more hours of this
ОтветитьSilicon-based life = grass. Its why you mower blades need fequent sharpening. And, exhalation = CO2, a gas, SiO2 is a solid. Considering the extemophiles on earth, it seems unlekely to fong silicon-based life.
ОтветитьAt around 34.50 ..Dawkins states life is a highly implausible event ..then he is actually admitting it must come ftom a higher power ie a Creator??
Just shot himself in the foot
Aren't all scientists philosophers at the beginning of their lives who get pushed and encouraged to get into a lab and become scientists? perhaps those philosophers were not motivated enough!
ОтветитьWhy is Dawkins talking about DNA when we are all different because of the genes turned on and off within our DNA? how many genes do we have and how many different combinations can we come up with in order to see that we are all different, isn't it true that we could reach the sun if we wrote the genome in books and stockpiled one on top of each other?
ОтветитьThe question that atheists can't answer and don't dare to ask is "is atheism a logical fallacy?". The most important, urgent and forbidden question is "is atheism a logical fallacy?". No atheist will ever ask "is atheism a logical fallacy?". I am not asking you to believe me, only to pay attention to discover the truth for yourself. The greatest knowledge of all time, that is going unnoticed, censored and not understood, is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. I am a psychologist and I want to know what do you understand when I say "to end the war in Ukraine the discovery that atheism is a logical fallacy has to be news". I am a poet that writes prose to be understood better, all my work is poetry. I can only speak in a human language to be understood. To understand atheism is a logical fallacy you have to understand why the most emblematic remark of atheism is "who created god?", with the intelligent creator of the universe written in lower case.
ОтветитьGod created the heavens and the earth. As a scientist, I always find it interesting that man's ego, his relentless desire to elevate his perceptions and observations above God, calling it science. Most modern science repudiates true science and the scientific method and calls theory truth.
ОтветитьTyson is the worst interviewer of all time. Nobody wants to listen to him and he let nobody speak. What a waste of interview
ОтветитьIf a planet is within the habitable zone of its star. Why wouldn't the things that evolve there be just like here? I think it would be exactly the same. Unless they didnt have a giant meteor wipe out their dinosaurs.. I feel like a TON of planets out there are just full of dinosaurs
ОтветитьSCIENCE IS THE FUTURE!
ОтветитьBrilliant conversation. Looking forward for many more such intellectual talks. Thank you
Ответитьshut up niel
ОтветитьIf only we were listening to science, the world would be a more beautiful and safe place to live.
ОтветитьScience must remain Science, and it must not turn into philosophy.
Ответить“The #1 problem on earth is human adults.”
ОтветитьOb diese beiden Idioten wohl bei Satan in der Hölle einen besonderen Platz einnehmen ? Man mag es bezweifeln.
ОтветитьYea
ОтветитьInteresting that
ОтветитьWord of God made the world with words. If the universe language is math then the word of God beyond powerful for it controls the words of mathematics
A
You two should work together because it is very important for us humans. Otherwise, more people who can participate in such collaborations. We are part of our Galaxy. All laws that exist in we are part of Galaxy, we live in and all laws and regulations apply to us as well. We must always remember the Quantuim of Words, Laws, Ideas.
Albert Einstein's space and time tell us. About We are occupying space. We cannot macth it hour, and second.
And Jesus, said ' Two taco's on Tuesday 'On Friday fish taco '
Jesus makes great fish tacos with the hottest 🥵 hot sauce!'
so you have an interesting discussion about science in many different and interesting perspectives and then you have a jackass asking the last irrelevant and ridiculous theistic gotcha type question that nobody cares about
ОтветитьMister Richard Dawkins, you are the reason why i started learning english. I just wanted to know what you are talking about. I love biology and now i can understand almost everything you say...thank you for changing my life. Greetins from Slovakia 🙂💚
ОтветитьI was here August 24th 2023
ОтветитьNeil humbled Richard... if they were to debate i think richard would tap out even if Neil tried to advocate for religion.
Ответитьso nice to see people lining up for science purposes- not Taylor Swift concert.
Ответить“We are not fallen angels, but risen apes” Dr. Andy Thompson
ОтветитьMr. Richard Dawkins, as a militaristic atheist, you will never be able to adopt the beauty of the mysticism of the world religions into science by getting creative and calling your shows “the poetry of science”. It’s absurd! Your shows are anything but poetry. Your attempts are quite unscientific!
ОтветитьConstantly realizing that while we have sensors connected to neurons etc., our biology connects neurons to the brain as a screen that reflects the real thing. However, human pilots have shields separating them from reality, which can be seen through cockpit windows and many sensor gauges. You are a human being and a vehicle for birth and death, however, you are involuntary, which means birth, death and reincarnation (if any). It really is your right to believe it or not. Your understand reality is fundamental.
ОтветитьThat was really good
ОтветитьNDG is such a blagger. He must suffer imposter syndrome. So many words, so little said.
ОтветитьToo many interesting topics things I’ve pondered myself and these two giving their insights. It’s a joy.
ОтветитьWhat you must remember is that the original EM made and labeled in the 1890s is still used today. This is wrong because today's is not the same labels as 1890. Why they do not fix this is a wonder. Another example is that the computer decided to use the 1800s keyboard typewriter in now's computers. Kids today wonder.
ОтветитьProf Dawkins is a master of his craft, demonstrating wisdom. Hopefully, astrophysicist Tyson reflected of this discourse and gleaned insight…that less can be more… .
ОтветитьNeil deGrasse Tyson says many interesting things, but ultimately comes across as mildly annoying. Basically, he's a bit too full of himself. You DO NOT interrupt or talk over Richard Dawkins!
ОтветитьThe only problem is neil was cutting off Dr. Richard at many points.
ОтветитьThere's a point the black guy goes too far or he was just getting giddy with it
Very unprofessional.
Have Dawkins ever met Sagan face to face? Imagine them combined in a debate.
ОтветитьNLT'S OF Possible LIFE on is baloney. we have NO CLUE HOW LIFE BEGINSNevery claim we do is false
ОтветитьI loved it when Tyson said you're not justified to trust senses 🤩
ОтветитьGod I would love for Neil to stop interrupting so much. This was 12 years ago and if you’ve seen “startalk” lately it’s clear he hasn’t changed… as much as I’d love to pick his brain I’m afraid I’d barely get a word in
Ответить49' Dawkins accepts being short-sighted by blaming his colleague.
Ответить43' Still generalizing taking the Earth as a model. It seems that we are still under the Ptolemaic system. Is it a self-protective attitude? We always pretend to be the center of the universe no matter what!
Ответить33' What if Silicon-based life exists? the same way that it took billions of years for the Earth to have Carbon-based life forms. We tend to generalize, to establish paths in function of our egocentric Carbon based biological origins. Maybe there is "something else" that we cannot even detect with our conventional way of perception-enhancing devices.
Ответить