Комментарии:
We Finnish defence forces use that howitzer. Very good functioning.
ОтветитьI respect you South Korea! Keep those Kim Jun pigs in their pen!
ОтветитьWhy do they have a hole ass arm just to scoot the round over 2 feet just have the guy lay it in to the the thing that shoves the round in the barrel and call it a day. Alot of unneeded shit going on
ОтветитьEuropean Fascism and the Nazis 2023
ОтветитьWelcome to Poland 😊
ОтветитьSeems like PzH2000 is still King. The autoloader of K9 seems to be quite bit slower. Still impressive.
Ответить국방부에서 지우라는데 아직도 안지우네 방통위에 신고해줄까?
Ответитьpzh 2000 is faster
ОтветитьUkraine war proved that artillery is still king of the battle. Foreign volunteer fighters in Ukraine are complaining that they never see Russian soldiers just Russian shelling from their artillery killing from far distance. S Korea is equipped with 3000 SP artillery (K9, K55 and K105HT), 5000 105/155mm towed artillery, 6000 60/81/107/120mm mortars and 570 MRL(360 K239, 58 M270 and 156 K136) seating on 12 million rounds (during WW2, total of 11 million rounds were used) enough to deal with Chinese army :)-
ОтветитьK9 Thunder is beautiful tank
Ответить반동제어가 진짜 예술임.
Ответитьpzh2000영상 보고 왔는데 확실히
K9이 더 흔들리긴한다
probably one of the best sounding SPG's ive heard. Change my mind
ОтветитьKorean and Chinese military hardware are the same ,
I will not forget what Korean soldiers under Japanese empire raping Filipina during world war 2
ポンコツ兵器
ОтветитьYeah~ kill all chirona virus
ОтветитьK9a2 부탁드립니다. ^^
Ответить진짜 대한민국 포병은 미군한테도 꿀릴 것 없고 훨씬 멋있어 보임.
ОтветитьI have worked on the Indian L&T produced K9. Quite powerful and complex weapon system made by Hanwha. Especially the hydraulic assisted autoloader arm shown in the video.
Ответить그저 포방부
ОтветитьAutoloading not as good as pzh 2000
ОтветитьIt is not an Autoloader. Its an assisted loader i.e. it's assisting the manual loader to load the round into the breach. I am pretty sure the loader actually pushes the round into the breach.
Ответить아니 중국포는 한번쏘면 뒤로 자체가 번더지던데 한국포는 그냥 가만히 있네요 헐~~~
Ответить구형k9 신형으로 교체해라. 수출품은 신형인디.
우리나라는 수출품들은 좋게 만들면서 자국품은 개허접으로 만드는거 뭐냐. 미국좀 배워라.
K9 SP artillery for on demand accurate fire power and K239 K-MLRS rocket launchers will make river of fires covering large area against larger opponents. Quality, price and spare parts will be available due to in large quantity of these in service with S Korean Army 1200 for K9 and 360 for K239. German weapons are nice too but almost twice more expensive and not many spare parts available due to only few in service for German Army. Next 5 years, S Korean military budget is about to pass Japan, Germany, UK and France coming close to $60 billion a year. Polish decided to use K9 chasis due to stability problem with T72 chasis using for heavy SP artillery. Nice about K9 is that it has computer system for tri rounds landing at target same time, auto loader, fastest auto reloading system with K10 loader carrier, compatible with US GPS system and long range without using rocket assisted rounds. K9 can also fire direct shot at tanks or over the mountain for long range kill.
ОтветитьMay i ask The self-propelled artillery K9 was a prototype developed based on the M109 or PZH2000
ОтветитьI would like to ask. K9 Howitzer Rok bought a patent, bought a Novak from Germany or the US to produce by myself, right ?
And K136 mlrs was a patent from the former Soviet Union to be produced, right ?
New weapons for who purchased K9 should be K239 Chunmoo MLRS which can use 227mm M270.
Ответить국방TV 유튜브관리자입니다. 귀하께서 업로딩한 이 영상은 국방TV에서 제작 게시한 영상입니다. 이 영상에 대한 별도의 허락없이 개인 유튜브에 게시할수없는 영상입니다. 원본영상 링크 공유를 제외하고는 업로딩할수없음을 알려드리며 삭제해주시기를 요청드립니다.
Ответить주퇴복좌 할때 느낌 오르가즘임
Ответить포병은 전장의 신이다.
ㅡ이오시프 스탈린ㅡ
군대있을때 왜 155미리로 같을까
ОтветитьThose howitser/haubitze firings look quit powerful
Ответитьlots of moving parts
ОтветитьK9 Thunder=50/20 cost siege tank with no upgrade
Pzh2000=150/100 cost siege tank with upgrade
세계 최강!!
Ответить+K10 포탄 리필 가능
Ответить통일! 5군단 k-9자주포 2번포수부터 포반장까지 거치면서 우리나라 자주포 기술력과 국방력은 세계 최고수준이라고 감히 말합니다!!
Ответить명품국산무기 K9! 주석궁에 맘껏 포격하는 그날을 기대해본다.
Ответитьふーん、えっちじゃん
Ответить확실히 기체 흔들림 이런거는 pzh 2000이 훨 안정적이네요. 탄장전도 더 심플화 해야겠고
ОтветитьWhy cut out the ramming and the charge loading? Disappointing.
Ответить