How Snoop Killed Samuel - Anatomy Of A Fall Analysis

How Snoop Killed Samuel - Anatomy Of A Fall Analysis

Cinema Detective

2 месяца назад

80,127 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@petitnicollas
@petitnicollas - 31.03.2024 23:44

50 cent killed him

Ответить
@icyjaam
@icyjaam - 01.04.2024 16:57

Woah, youre right.

Ответить
@CapitulationTrader
@CapitulationTrader - 01.04.2024 20:15

Banger!

Ответить
@andyholbrook7208
@andyholbrook7208 - 01.04.2024 23:57

I feel so proud of myself for coming to the same conclusion.😂

Ответить
@McDonaldsCalifornia
@McDonaldsCalifornia - 03.04.2024 12:33

If Triet really wanted to make the dog look guilty she should have had him glance left and right in a close-up

Ответить
@mechantrechyrmang8762
@mechantrechyrmang8762 - 03.04.2024 13:47

I agree with your explanation and analysis, had Snoop got no involvement then its pointless for the first scene of him fetching the ball. We see Sandra walking cautiously in the unfinished Attic floor so it's possible that Samuel must have accidentally step on the ball. And lastly when Sandra insist to Vincent that she's didn't commit the crime we can see her saying that's it's really not her.

Ответить
@journeywith6v6
@journeywith6v6 - 04.04.2024 00:06

I think you might be right, as Sandra said at the start frankly, she think Samuel simply fell. I think this also makes more sense taking into account Samuel's psyche, he loves Daniel too much it wouldn't make sense for him to commit suicide

Ответить
@laurag5214
@laurag5214 - 04.04.2024 23:58

I like this theory, but hard to believe slipping on the ball he'd end up out the window. Samuel was insulating the roof, he probably saw something odd and leaned out the window to take a look from another perspective. Maybe that's where Snoop's ball comes in too?

Ответить
@cherrySK123
@cherrySK123 - 05.04.2024 12:48

Who killed him? Pls reply I didn't understand?

Ответить
@brucey7164
@brucey7164 - 05.04.2024 17:55

It’s a fictional movie. No one killed anybody. You’re just making up stories. None of the stories are true. I just made up. People have fun doing that, but the truth is nobody died nobody killed anyone in the movie. The writers and filmmakers just made a movie that demonstrated how we often don’t know why something happened. It’s silly to try to figure out what happened. What happened was a movie was made. It’s not real.

Ответить
@veevee1209
@veevee1209 - 06.04.2024 02:12

Very good job. Hats off to you.

Ответить
@HuplesCat
@HuplesCat - 06.04.2024 08:25

It’s a great film. I did suspect snoop. He takes his ball upstairs and it’s not seen again

Ответить
@vikieinstein
@vikieinstein - 06.04.2024 21:25

Where did the ball went after he stepped over it, if it was there it could have been easily closed as an accident by the police

Ответить
@fakeigniz13
@fakeigniz13 - 07.04.2024 00:35

I swear there was a scene where a detective finds a feather or something and it's meant to suggest maybe a bird got in and simply spooked the dad into accidentally falling.

But i could be misremembering.

I'm sure there was meant to be an unspoken suggestion of it being a random act that was the cause but everyone needs someone to be at fault.

Ответить
@CloudMountainJuror
@CloudMountainJuror - 07.04.2024 09:52

I unironically love this theory, and might just believe it.

Ответить
@ravikirankaravadi5457
@ravikirankaravadi5457 - 07.04.2024 14:14

Truly fantastic theory... It might be possible in that manner... I was wonderful director always wants to observe through the point of dog... Cinematic detective a background of applause❤👏👏👏👏👏👏

Ответить
@vinuetto
@vinuetto - 07.04.2024 20:41

Unacceptable! Free Messi the best doggo! 😂

Ответить
@rithikraj9664
@rithikraj9664 - 08.04.2024 13:56

This is the best possible explanation. Why would he choose the attic as the suicide spot? He couldn’t have planned to hit his head to that corner. It is rather unlikely to die from the jump

Ответить
@dropbear4973
@dropbear4973 - 08.04.2024 16:20

Bingo.

Ответить
@xaviconde
@xaviconde - 09.04.2024 16:21

The only thing this video proves to me is that some people would make the strangest theories to exclude the possibility that a woman would kill her husband. They think it's more thinkable to believe that a dog did it rather than a woman.

Ответить
@olive818
@olive818 - 09.04.2024 23:31

🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

Ответить
@johnwayne6253
@johnwayne6253 - 11.04.2024 10:22

👍👍👏👏

Ответить
@ndafyst4769
@ndafyst4769 - 11.04.2024 17:10

so the movie is a comedy?

Ответить
@lukkash
@lukkash - 14.04.2024 12:36

OTHER INTERESTING ISSUE: isn’t it strange that Sandra could work when her husband was playing music so loudly and then went to sleep (to have a rest), allegedly she used earplugs; yet it’s still disturbing that she didn’t say to him to turn off or at least volume down that very loud music 🤔

Ответить
@ObviousBooks
@ObviousBooks - 14.04.2024 20:44

Perfect. Nailed it. The only PLAUSIBLE solution. Congratulations!

Ответить
@TomRipley7350
@TomRipley7350 - 15.04.2024 01:21

Nah, Sandra did it. The loud music during her flirtation was the snapping point. She could’ve gone up and asked him to turn it down so she could continue, but no, she sent her guest away so she could solve her problem once and for all. She would’ve been livid. The idea she could casually start work after being antagonised and with same music that drove away her guest blaring on repeat is incredible. They simply came to blows again like the recorded argument but it went a different way.

Ответить
@mtarkes
@mtarkes - 18.04.2024 15:58

Always blame the house dog. Always.

Ответить
@posteador
@posteador - 19.04.2024 02:01

Yes, I alway thought about the accident option, accidents in construction are super common everywhere... but I never considered the "ball and dog" scenario. 😁

Ответить
@jenithneranjana8967
@jenithneranjana8967 - 20.04.2024 11:54

I thought exactly the same when I watched this.

Ответить
@mariadelpeso8140
@mariadelpeso8140 - 21.04.2024 01:11

How can you put a spoiler alert once the video starts when the freaking miniature is a spoiler itself 😵‍💫

Ответить
@clarkwong2770
@clarkwong2770 - 21.04.2024 07:55

But why window open so wide?

Ответить
@Ash.Crow.Goddess
@Ash.Crow.Goddess - 21.04.2024 08:35

The 50 Cent and Snoop Dogg connection is strong. Because the instrumental that Samuel plays is P.I.M.P. He got too big for his britches. Samuel never wrote that book. But Snoop became one famous Dogg after he beat that murder rap. Foshizzal.

Ответить
@isaiasgarcia
@isaiasgarcia - 22.04.2024 04:21

Hey Cinema Detective, was wondering what's the best way to get in touch with you via email to inquire about acquiring your services consulting on a film production? I wasn't able to find your contact info anywhere. Looking forward to your reply! =)

Ответить
@sherv4651
@sherv4651 - 22.04.2024 06:33

Thank you, I will accept this as what really happened I can sleep better tonight not wondering did she do it. This ending makes the most logical sense

Ответить
@sweeneagle16
@sweeneagle16 - 22.04.2024 19:04

I like this theory. The triangle shape of the ceiling and window would have him crouching a bit in the corner. If he’s leaning out the window smoking and the ball is dropped behind him, he could easily slip, lose his balance and fall out but first. The window and ceiling are smooth so there’s nothing to grab. He’d just go. Then flip backward head first. Nice catch

Ответить
@Stefarooh
@Stefarooh - 24.04.2024 18:51

This was an incredible film, that scene in the middle where you get the flashback to the marital fight, while the court hears the recorded version is just incredible. An acting masterclass that should be studied by fellow actors who serious about getting into this business.

Ответить
@meglaw74
@meglaw74 - 26.04.2024 16:11

Anatomy of a ball

Ответить
@VanisriMuniraj
@VanisriMuniraj - 27.04.2024 15:10

Totally agree With this

Ответить
@paulmckenna6247
@paulmckenna6247 - 28.04.2024 13:56

Brilliant.

Ответить
@AM-sw9di
@AM-sw9di - 28.04.2024 15:11

It's weird how they dismiss the murder weapon so easily, if she had murdered him they didn't care to look for a weapon even if it could be disposed of easily. Made no sense as I'm sure they could have found it if there was one. So the ball completely disappearing after the dad dying is interesting. No one would suspect that the ball was the 'murder weapon'.

Ответить
@daskdask
@daskdask - 30.04.2024 04:59

You solved it!

Ответить
@RamGlez
@RamGlez - 01.05.2024 22:25

But was the window big enough for Samuel to accidentally slip and fall?

Ответить
@danzigvssartre
@danzigvssartre - 02.05.2024 14:14

I’m sorry, but this theory has me picturing Daniel falling out the window like he’s Inspector Clouseau. I guess he is French though?

Ответить
@aidanp2544
@aidanp2544 - 04.05.2024 18:08

Anatomy of a Ball

Ответить
@Jo-be1ws
@Jo-be1ws - 08.05.2024 00:47

I think that the choice of a red leash is not insignificant either. Thank you for this good analysis.

Ответить
@behtashs
@behtashs - 13.05.2024 03:35

The repeated showing of the staircase is nodding to the staircase story in the US. Also, the way she took the idea from her bf, and made into a story of her own, the writer of this movie took the idea from staircase built his own story around it.

Ответить
@DIGITALBREAD_
@DIGITALBREAD_ - 13.05.2024 15:30

No way man, you’ve acc cracked this film in my opinion. I know there’s not really supposed to be an answer but wow all of this went right over my head and all of it adds up perfectly. Great video man!

Ответить
@imamoviefanatic
@imamoviefanatic - 14.05.2024 00:06

I also consider this

Ответить
@Ed.Garrity
@Ed.Garrity - 15.05.2024 10:05

It was the dog all along!

Ответить
@TheCinemaDetective
@TheCinemaDetective - 13.03.2024 01:04

Some more "evidence" to consider:

Justine Triet has said that throughout the trial Sandra speaks French when she is in control and knows what she wants to say but switches to English when she gets emotional or impulsive. 

I'd say she switches to English when she gets confused but those are my words, regardless the switching of languages is a technique Triet has admitted to using to signify something.

When Vincent first arrives at the house he goes up to the attic with Sandra to investigate the fall. He asks if there is any reason why Samuel would lean out the window. Sandra says no, and that when Samuel was playing his music he shut himself off from the rest of the world so he never called for her or Daniel.

Vincent: Anyway with the... the height of the... le rebord de la fenêtre
Sandra: Windowsill

So Vincent gets confused and has to switch to French when he's saying the height of the windowsill makes it impossible to believe in an accidental fall.  He can't remember the English word for windowsill. 

I can't think any other time in the script when Vincent's English failed him, but it fails him right there when he's dismissing potential for an accident fall. 

So is that a coincidence? Why was this scripted? 🕵

Thanks to everyone who has watched and commented!

Ответить