I Finally Found Out What 0/0 Should Be

0/0 has to be zero.2^2 is 4,2^1 is 2 because 4/2=2 and 2^0 is 1 because 2/2=1,now lets do this with zero.0^2=0 ,0^1 is also zero,that means 0/0=0

0/0 can be everything. I’ll show it in an equation:
0/0=x
0=x*0
0=0
x - any number

0/0=R. Even tho x+1=x might be a problem, but if 0/0=R, wouldn't that mean R+1=R? Any real number plus one is again a real number, so that works. Also, R*0=0. Prove me wrong.

There's infinite amounts of limits wich equal to 0/0 but with using special tricks or theorems to turn it in actual answer. wich means there's infinte definitions of 0/0 wich means 0/0 is could be equal to anything.

𝐆𝐔𝐘𝐒 𝐈 𝐅𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐖𝐄𝐑 𝐎𝐅 𝟎÷𝟎??!?!?

I think 0 over 0 should be one half. If we have two answers, we should take the average, which would be one half. I'm not counting infinity as no averages can be drawn if we use infinity

"0 over 0" you mean zero zeroths?

0/0 equal Indeterminate

0

isn’t it 0?? If you have 0 blocks and you take 0% of it you will have 0 left!!

I honestly stick to the theory that anything divided by itself equals to one, this is only my opinion and i'm not trying to prove anything. But here's my take on 0/0. 0/0 can be written as 1-1/1-1, we can cancel the -1/-1 and be left with 1/1 which is just 1.

Anything divided by 0 is, by the rules, Indefinable hence the operation is illegal. It's a waste of time to say more...

Not convinced. Given L.H.S=R.H.S, no matter if it is infinite or not, you cannot say that L.H.S=R.H.S still holds after multiplying one of the sides by another number than 1. Yes, 2* ∞ is still defined as ∞, but if you have a=∞ and b=2*a, then b>a. b is simply a larger infinity. It is a bit more complicated when you add a finite number (like 1) to infinity on i.e R.H.S, because then you cannot say that R.H.S>L.H.S because the factor a such that a*L.H.S=R.H.S converges to 1 when the number you add on R.H.S approaches a finite number.

Who think zero divine zero is one
👇

So... zero over zero can be either positive infinity, negative infinity or zero? Why people do drugs when there's math?

What does % look like? 0/0?

0/0 is NOT undefined. It's indeterminate.
Undefined essentially means a calculation has no result. Like 1/0. Assigning any value will tend to cause logical contradictions that break math.
Indeterminate means you could assign effectively ANY value as a result and still potentially have a logically coherent system of mathematics.

1

Zero is just a special case. If you divide any number by 0, it is either infinity or negative infinity. Thus, 0 divided by 0 being infinity is not really a surprising answer. Intuitively it makes sense - how many times can 0 go into 0? An infinite amount of times - that's the only answer. All of this is not very useful though.

0/0=Indeterminate

0

If zero equals to nothing, zero divided by zero is nothing/nothing. Thinking it in a non mathematical way, "nothing" generally is a negative term unless it's used in the context of some religions for example, buddhism. -x/-x is +x . Therefore nothing divided by nothing is litterally everything. So 0/0 basiclly equals everything in the universe. You are a part of the answer to 0/0. It's unlogic to assume that everything is the answer to 0/0, but no one knows how the universe truely behaves.

If x/x = 1 when x≠0, x/x should still equal 1 when x IS 0 because any number divided by itself is technically 1 (excluding infinity). But we could also say 0/0 is 0 because of real world equations like "You have 0 pawns for 0 chess boards." Each chess board will have 0 pawns because there were no pawns to begin with.

I think of it like this. 0 objects divided amongst 0 people.....nothing happens, just 0

0/0 should be the set of real numbers R (very similar to the idea presented in the video). Then, I would need to define what adding,substracting, multiplying and dividing sets means.
A+B = {x+y | x in A and y in B}
A+y ={x+y | x in A}
x+B ={x+y | y in B}
So 1 + 0/0 = 1 + R = R. 2*0/0 = 2*R = R

dont worry 0/0 is 0

math is literally made up of "inventions"
1+4×5 is only 21, because we have made up a singular technique to solve it. if we didn't, and we set up a different way, it could've also very well been 25, and then that would've been regarded as correct

so why tf can't we say x/0 is 0? (or 1?) we are not bound by any rules, other than the ones we set up, by inventing

I think 0/0 should be 248

𝐎𝐤𝐚𝐲.

zero is a number. Infinity is not. So your result is NaN.

Most square roots have 2 answers don't they? So i think that 0/0 being any number makes sense you know

8/2. it is the number of 8 things that can be distributed amongst 2 people evenly. 1/2 is giving half of the thing to 2 people. 0/0 is giving 0 things to 0 people. but there were no things to exist in the first place. no people to exist as well. this means that there is only 1 way we can give 0 things to 0 people. just like in permutations and combinations, when you're distributing zero items among individuals, regardless of how many items are available, there's only one way to give each person zero things. Also, distributing zero items among any number of individuals, the number of ways to give each person zero items remains the same—it's always one way.


Therefore, according to this theory, 0/0 = 1

You can say the answer is infinite or -infinite... how can that be anything but undefinable? If you choose one or the other, I think you have to break math.

1/n = 2/(n×2) = 0/n =(0×1)/n = 0/(n×0) = 0/0

even divide by even you get heaven) infinity proof)

Ok, so.
Maybe ignore the rules and look at the process?
So, how many zeroes to zero ?
One? No, because that is a quantuty of zeroes one zero is countable
-1 maybe? No, you get a floating point
By the way, the one means zero ones instead of one zero.
Nope. Not getting dumb again, mkay...
...
I think it should be zero, since in long division, you look for the smallest possible value (usually) and also, 0/0 =1 feels strangely uncanny
0/0 =0 messes the least
Because the number usualy is positive. Xor negative
I learned that 0 is neither in school ({0}) so, 0/0 should be 0 because it makes the most sense.

So annoying when people force there to be an issue when there is none. Instead of searching for new problems to solve, they focus on trying to change already accepted norms to cause chaos.

If you have "nothing". Then you have "nothing". Not infinity. Just "nothing". Complete opposites. Infinity is all.
You can't divide "nothing" just the same as you can't multiply "nothing".

But even if we were to entertain that "nothing" was something that could be divided, it's being divided by "nothing". So 0 divided up 0 times. So no changes. If you don't divide something, then it's not divided. If you take something and don't change it then it stays the same. All seems like some duh very simple stuff right? Cause it is so lets stop dumbing down the younger generations please.

S

_________
( ∞ ↓ ∞ )
—

∞ - ∞ = 0/0 = ∞/∞

He was right the first time with 0/0 = anything, or more specifically all real numbers. Using division as the inverse of multiplication, he mentioned that 0/0 could be defined as anything and everything. If we rephrased this as 0/0 = all real numbers, this statement is consistent with everything he said afterward. 0/0 + 1 = 0/0 still because the set of all reals shifted up by 1 is the set of all reals, and 0/0 * 2 = 0/0 still because the set of all reals stretched by 2 still equals all reals. Division being the inverse of multiplication is still true even when a single number is not returned. 0/0 = all reals is also proven by the graph of xy = 0, which is just both axes. Divide both sides by x to get an equivalent relation y = 0/x with the same graph. According to the graph, at x = 0, y = all reals, and in the equation of this graph this is y = 0/x -> all reals = 0/0. Finally, this is consistent with the definition of division (a/b = c where c is the solution of cb = a) because, if a = b = 0, then a/b is the solution of 0c = 0. The solution set, and therefore 0/0, is all real numbers.

Anyone got an idea for how this applies to the imaginaries?

1/0 = 0
I have 1 NCS circle.
I divide it into 0 pieces.
0 pieces = 0 NCS circles.

0/0 = 0
I have 0 NCS circles.
I divide it into 0 pieces.
0 pieces = 0 NCS circles.

mercy, you have nothing and you try to substract nothing from that....how many times could you do that substraction? that's the result of 0/0....by the way, division is how many times you may substract the divisor from the divident untl you get a number less than the divisor

I pretty much understand what he means, but I think he makes it too complicated. There probably is no answer to this but my thought is: if you have 0 apples, and divide them in 0 groups you don’t get infinite apples, but you do get 0 right? Is’nt that divisions purpose from the beginning, to be able to put things in equal groups, not to make a lot of equations. Please correct me if I’m missing something.

The answer is i, an imaginary number. 1/0=x. So that means that x times 0 equals 1. But any number, including infinity multiplied by 0 equals 0. So it can't be any number that actually exists. But undefined multiplied by 0 would have to equal 1. But since undefined isn't a value the answer must be an imaginary number, called i in mathematics.

Guys, don’t worry, Ik the answer form sheer smartness and will, the answer is: intermediate
I don’t use a calculator idk what a calculator is

I think instead of thinking it as infinity in a positive or negative sense, zero should be thought of as central infinity. Multiplying by it pulls the answer to zero because it infinitely consumes the other number, but dividing by it can’t happen because you can’t divide a number by the central infinite constant connecting the positive and negative number lines since it holds no direct value, only a central infinity constant.

I think its 0, and u couldny really do the denominator multiplication thing cause theres no way to represent 1/1 with a 0 denominator since i also think any number over 0 is 0 😝😋