Комментарии:
did someone wroth all the commands and have them as a script? and if so please sand (:
ОтветитьGreat video. Charles not matching the sub interface id (.1) to the dot1q tag (2) makes me uncomfortable. I know it's completely arbitrary and does not need to match.
ОтветитьCan we use PE to Customer CE BGP instead of OSPF ? because sometime use need internet also via same link.
ОтветитьAm confused, Help Please!!
How come Router 3 can see all the other routes in the global routing table?
I thought the ospfs were only vrf advertised? how come they appear in the global table too?
Thank you
ОтветитьWell explained.
ОтветитьGreat video
ОтветитьThank you, it was so helpful! One of the bests! The steps are professionally explained, all clear, and the video is worth gold.
ОтветитьGuys - fantastic demo!! I replicated this topology in CML with a few modifications - mainly two OSPF areas just to observe the LSDB behavior. Very very helpful to clear up the F.U.D. as Kevin would say....😉
Ответитьwell explained charles
ОтветитьWow, So vrf is like Vlan of layer 3
ОтветитьThanks, Charles for this informative video lecture on VRF-Lite, i have learned even i am a newbie. ---CCNA 200-301 Master Class student of Kevin Wallace
ОтветитьFOOOFIGTA!!!! Love the video, many thanks!
ОтветитьSimple explained easy to understanding, Thank you man
ОтветитьExcellent video! Thank you for the tutorial, Charles.
ОтветитьQuestion... why didn't you use the "vrf definition" command or the "address-family" command?
When are those commands needed?
can you upload the configuration text ???
ОтветитьI am a Beginner in Networking..Could some one explain why we used encapsulation .1q in the R1 g0/0.1
and g0/0.2 interfaces?
Crystal clear explanation. Thanks a ton.
ОтветитьThis is a life saver, I just started working for an ISP a few days ago and my CCNA definitelly didn't cover anything about VRF combined with OSPF so this will definitelly help me to be at least aware on how to do a basic configuration.
ОтветитьGreat video!
ОтветитьI am curious why area 1 was used in ospf and not area 0? Is it because they are customers and not part of the service provider's backbone area?
Ответитьwell explained and.. I really like your poster!!! 😄
ОтветитьThanks, i did understand
Ответитьwow great sir
Ответитьbest tutorial ever....great work sir!!!
ОтветитьVery useful content...
ОтветитьExcellent video, very informative.
ОтветитьExcellent explanation. Thanks
ОтветитьVery well articulated.
ОтветитьSo simple and so clear !!!
I loved the video .
It made my vrf concept cristal and clear.
Glad to you Kevin 💐 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💐
I must have to say this is the first time i am seeing the concept of VRF this simple and easy to understand. Thanks a lot
ОтветитьThank you for this great video!
ОтветитьNice explanation
ОтветитьThank you. Do you know how to configure authentication for VRF?
ОтветитьI was thinking, what would it happen if instead of a point-to-point link between R1 and R2, I had a Port-channel, how things would change in that scenario?
ОтветитьPerfectly explained. Helps me writing my fundamentals part for my Bachelor-Thesis.
ОтветитьWhy use AREA 1 ospf and not area 0 , I know is Mandatory area 0
ОтветитьSir, thanks a lot, you saved 2 hours of my time with your prompt and precise explanation. Always your fan.
ОтветитьPerfection
ОтветитьThis answered the question I had for weeks. Very well explained and easy to understand. From now is just a matter of practice, practice to master this topic.
ОтветитьRien à dire @Kevin . Bravo . et merci pour tes efforts.
ОтветитьThis is great for customer traffic separation, but what if you need to access something in another VRF? Maybe customers need access to Internet? Or maybe access to common servers in DC? Only way I found is VRF route leaking. It would be nice to demo that concept.
ОтветитьHi, thank you for the video, how come we don't use area 0 when configuring OSPF?
ОтветитьThanku so much ......Very important
ОтветитьIf everything were as easy in my life as this, I would be President of the United States. Thank you very much for the video. It is the most rewarding experience for me today.
Ответитьvery well done CJ. I recently had to implement a NAT statement on vrf and had a litttle difficulty finding where to reference the specific vrf, its done towards the end.
ОтветитьWonderfully explained and demonstrated. Thanks a lot!
ОтветитьVery informative! Thank you!!
Ответить