Комментарии:
where is kenzo placed at then
ОтветитьIt’s missing Balenciaga, Balmain, Dolce&Gabbana, Versace, Ferragamo, Montblanc… it’s not very accurate 🤔
ОтветитьMiu Miu in the Classics? Come on… 😂
ОтветитьGoyard is supreme luxury
ОтветитьI would put Telfar even lower than what it was. It would go in the same category as Kenneth: Steve Madden.
Ответитьwho gives a fcuk honestly! you are no better that anyone else if you are at the "top of the pyramid"...its a pyramid for god's sake....scheme anyone?
super rich people actually don't care about this things.
Darn accurate
ОтветитьChanel is not supreme luxury in quality Just by increasing price they are only promoting the Fake market
ОтветитьYou mean bags from most expensive to least expensive
ОтветитьChanel should not be in supreme
ОтветитьI would consider chanel as classic luxury not Supreme
ОтветитьGraff?
ОтветитьTom Ford?
ОтветитьTom ford and Brioni should be in supreme theyre suits,crocodile shoes, etc are extremely expensive and rare.
ОтветитьWhere is Ralph Lauren brands?
ОтветитьI didnt see but where us Louis Vuitton?
ОтветитьWhy would PS be in the accessible section and Acne in the 'more expensive' contemporary section?
ОтветитьI think all of these categories are nonsense
Ответитьwhere is loro piana?
ОтветитьLV is actually a Legacy brand so is Chanel as it is not supreme (believe me!) and there are a few brands above supreme which are so exclusive no one but those who need to know, know them. Even Wintour respects those
ОтветитьBottega veneta should be higher up
ОтветитьDoes this goes a long with real quality or just a perceived?
ОтветитьI thought Tory Burch was niche
ОтветитьWhere is Goyard?
ОтветитьI had a delvaux wallet for years and i never knew it was a luxury item.... Since i didn t buy it.... I got it as a gift... From my grandma who got it from a garage sale 💀 (the type where people just don t check if something is valuable or not...)
Ответитьwhat about Graff I thought they were at the top of the top
ОтветитьI am willing to spend money up to classic luxury only.
ОтветитьI couldn’t find ysl anywhere
Ответитьfact
ОтветитьRubbish total waste of money
ОтветитьI can't imaging of buying any of them...they are too expensive and what if I get one would i be satisfied that I have spend so much on one bag. I rather use and throw the local bags.
ОтветитьNo .
Gucci should be on the top one
I hate when people categorize brands like this. A lot of luxury brands fall into multiple tiers. Some brands even fall into all of them.
Accessible: Dumb Chanel sunglasses with CCs or camellias on the temple. They sell zillions of these to tourists at the Rue Cambon store, and have for ages. They're not even especially premium in terms of eyewear. (Some of their simple bags, those tacky flats with the logos on the toes, and other small accessories live in this tier.)
Luxury: The majority of their bags and clothes are luxury, and they have pieces that cater to each of the customers mentioned. (I would add another tier for edgier/artier brands under the luxury tier. Comme des Garcons, Yohji, Demeulemeester, etc. They're definitely their own thing with their own clientele.)
Supreme: They have their accessories that are part of the Couture and Metier d'Arts collections. (There are also more brands that fit into this tier, especially when you include men's bags. Berluti and Dunhill live here. Goyard does some pieces that are definitely "supreme." There are also niche houses that live in that tier.)
Dior does some of each tier. Chanel does some of each tier. Fendi does a little of everything. Vuitton does some of everything. I feel like it's better to look at things on a piece by piece basis. There's nothing tackier than buying luxury for the status of it. The goal should be connoisseurship. The more you have to spend, the better your taste should be.
Chanel doesn't deserve to be at the top anymore.
ОтветитьCan you please give an idea of brand Sandro Paris handbags . Please
ОтветитьI'd rather Carrey a trash bag. Over priced crap.
ОтветитьI agree based off of price like you mentioned and accessibility.
ОтветитьLV is not really that luxury. Their price is affordable.
ОтветитьWhere is MOYNAT?
ОтветитьSimplicity is best luxury❤
ОтветитьLoro Piana is above them all
ОтветитьWhere's Louis Vuitton? 😮
ОтветитьRalph Lauren didn't even make it
ОтветитьWhat about Goyard?
ОтветитьNo
ОтветитьBulgari? Lana Marks? Ferragamo?
ОтветитьI feel gucci should be higher or at least more to the right
ОтветитьAlexander Mc queen should be higher lol
ОтветитьVersace can’t even make the cut for accessible luxury??
Ответить