Ryzen 7 7800X3D (RDNA2) vs Core i9 14900K (UHD 770) - iGPU Comparison

The forza segment is a perfect example of why 1% lows matter

Intel might have more frames here and there but it's lagging like shit compared to the ryzen...

What is the point of comparing performance of a mid-high priced cpu to the most expensive ones?

Emm, shouldn't have you picked ryzen 9 to go against i9?

Wait, really 7800x3d have IGP ?

Does anyone know why it gives such low FPS?

Why AMD on GTA5 looks smooth on 25FPS and Intel does not at 35FPS????????

I think for GTA V you got them confused, AMD looks a lot smoother to be only 27fps, vice versa Intel is stuttering lol...

Nvidia and AMD Radeon left the chat

Интули гавно, что и следовало доказать

Why the amd one looks smoother for gta v

With 500 USD you can buy a PlayStation 5, better no?

Alan Wake 2 Running at 7 FPS is seriously impressive.

What happened to the DirectX feature that was suppose to combine your GPU and iGPU to add performance?

That's not a G series processor. The iGPU in it is not for gaming, but for desktop use when your main GPU is down.

He's using 3060 8GB

LOL

Even though the Intel IGPU has higher frames in GTA 5 it looks like its stuttering a lot more and has way worse gameplay! Same in Cyberpunk as well, the RDNA2 gameplay looks so much smoother even though both igpu's are having the same framerate!

1080???? should do 720p max

If they add good igpu, the GPU industries will get a serious hit.😂 One thing is sure this are not meant for gaming.

Who is going to run one of these high end CPU with no GPU? This year was unnecessary, unrealistic, and a waste of our time.

Daemn, just 2 Rdna 2 cores

GTA V se ve mas fluido en Ryzen, con disque 27fps? Esta como raro esa medicion...

AMD still makes the best processors in the world. My respects to the red team 👍

You don't have ark ascended?

iGPU = Beauty with No Brain

I don't know why RDNA2 gameplay looks much smoother and more fluent than Intel eventhough averaging less FPS in GTA V and PubG videos.

Pubg avg 30fps looks way worse than 25 of ryzen

Tested my 7800X3D with City Skylines 2: 3 FPS. Awesome optimized game =)

В гта видно ,что игра на райзене идет лучше,а показатели хуже интела.Как это вообще работает? 🤣

I think the root cause why iGPU on Ryzen is a bit more comfortable and less chopppy from user point of view is how both CPUs handle RAM. While AM5 Ryzens can operate up to 6000 MT/s or even 6400 MT/s when you are lucky in silicon lottery or custom tunning, intel always runs memory controller in half frequency compared to memory frequency (UCLK = 1/2 MCLK) and as iGPU relies on system memory, each slow down counts in the chain

I'm sorry but Starfield and Alan Wake 2 killed me!

I often forget the 7800X3D has an iGPU because it's a CPU thats purely meant to be paired with high end GPUs lol.

Can't really be upset with IGPU performance if you consider how much space they have to work with vs a dedicated GPU.

If people wants to play games with just their onboard graphics best cpu or APU is ryzen 7 5700g or ryzen 5 5600G other then that i would go for a rx 580 or gtx 1650 for modern games

27 FPS on AMD looks better than 35 on Intel... the same about cyberP... what's going on?

In almost ALL the games the intel 770 is being HORRIBLE despite not showing it in the average OR the 1% lows...

iGPU will decreases CPU stability and cost higher core voltage, don't turn on iGPU if you have a graphics card
misc things like iGPU PCIE controller GNA should be on North Bridge to improve CPU cores cache and IMC

LOL the difference in frametime is way more important than the fps here...

How about some older titles such as Borderlands 2?

Lmao starfield 😂😂😂 🤣🤣😂🤣😂😂

Quem diria que esse dia chegaria

The Ryzen iGPU is in the I/O die, the Intel iGPU is in the actual CPU. It’s amazing how well AMDs performs given how tiny it is and that it’s on a separate piece of silicon. Neither of these iGPUs are not meant for gaming at all, they’re meant for basic office PC use which is what 95% of CPUs are used for. Schools and businesses buy basic desktops from Lenovo and Dell by the truckload for answering emails and spreadsheets. Any larger iGPU would be wasted for 95% of people, and a massive waste of precious silicon die space driving up cost. Who would pay $800 for a CPU with a “powerful” iGPU that realistically is equivalent to a $250 dGPU? Just get a $300 CPU and $500 dGPU, both of which can be upgraded independently.

There’s no point to adding a much larger iGPU even if they wanted, even if cost is not a concern, it’s limited by system memory bandwidth. The only way to get better performance would be to do what Apple has done and use much closer, wider memory bus. The system memory is sitting on the same substrate as the CPU. But then you’re not making a socketed CPU, and the CPU alone will cost $700 alone, and you have no upgradability.

Jesus Horizon 5 is crazy optimized

La real pelea de invalidos

This is not core i9 this is RIP i9🤣🤣🤣

The 7800x3d's igpu looks smoother even when it's fps is less..

Good video. I have overclocked every Intel 770 igpu I own to 2000mhz without touching voltage. Your mileage may vary.