Комментарии:
No mention of Vietnam War, American Civil War and 1999 Bombing of Yugoslavia?
Ответить“Unfair war”? Your logic thusly says there is such a thing as a “fair” version. That is a perversely reductionist view of war. To paraphrase, “Wars do not determine who wins, rather who is left”.
ОтветитьSkill issue
ОтветитьWhite Christian Supremacy be like:
Ответитьhow is a war unfair? it makes NO SENSE!
ОтветитьPretty much all the British wars are/were wars of evil
ОтветитьThese are uneven wars, not necessarily ‘unfair’
Ответить"Most unfair wars in history" Simple History propaganda "There is no fair in love or war" - Reality
ОтветитьIraq invades Kuwait: INTERNATION INVATION GROUP BY THE UN
Russia invades Ukraine: crickets
War?.
That rules out most of the western worlds ,( Israeli included ) recent attacks on middle Eastern people's.
They were more akin to genocides.
The part on Desert Storm was longer than the combat phase of the war😄 and no T-80 tanks for the Iraqis....
ОтветитьI'd include Tlthe hilariously one-sided British invasion of Ethiopia in 1868. An insane ruler started kidnapping priests and diplomats. Britian sailed in a rescue force of 20,,000 British and Indian troops with 40,000 horses and elephants - Marched across a mountainous desert, annialated the Emperor's army, rescued the hostages, and then went home again. It would be amazing logistics now, but in the 1860s it was next level.
ОтветитьThe fact that Denmark vs Germany in WW2 is missing form this video is disappointing
ОтветитьThis idiot has never heard thr doctrine of Force Matching.
ОтветитьAre you just gonna ignore that the Zanzibar war was largely about the new big man wanting slavery and the British wanting to stop it?? (Or just show bags of money you absolute hack?!)
ОтветитьShort: USA is a imperial terrorist and unfair to the bones. The USA caused 25 million (!!) death civilians so far. Nevertheless they never got any international sanctions. I hope that will change when they invate Iran in the near future - which would be a war crime.
Ответитьgo g
ОтветитьThat's no WW2 US soldier.
It's obviously a WW2 Pacific Theater US Marine.
I'm surprised the Rhodesian conflict didn't come up (although I realize it's controversial). But having the Rhodesians highly trained and equipped by comparison made them battlefield victorious again and again while ultimately losing the war. Although I guess that disqualifies them from it being one-sided since they ultimately lost (although on the battlefield it was one-sided).
Ответить"If you find yourself in a fair fight, you didn't plan your mission properly." - David Hackworth
Ответитьsome these waky men stood their ground ig would have on a desk yes
ОтветитьAn old comedy featured saddam on a boat shouting: "They're cross dressers, kill them!" Cant remember what it was called.
ОтветитьI was with the 3rd ACR. We captured a lot of Iraqi tanks, which since we didn't have the logistics to pack up and take home, we towed out and shot up like it was a shooting gallery.
I got to see inside several of them, still with all their gear and ammo, and realized immediately why they were no match for us: they used caseless rounds with about half the propellant of a US Army tank round, much of which was stored openly. ANY penetration was likely to set that ammo off, no matter how minor. On top of that, the gunner's station used no modern equipment, but a very large scope marked with about a dozen kinds of manual-calculation notching systems. This meant that the gunner had to have information everything from range to target width/length/angle to current wind speed in order to lay the gun and fire it accurately - which in a real warfare situation, happening in real time, took a lot longer and was prone to error, especially at longer ranges.
It was the equivalent of a little kid swinging at you while you held them at arm's reach, before punching their lights out.
So modern focused lol
Ответить2 days ago 😮
ОтветитьThe only wars the Arabs have ever won are the wars they fought against each other 😂🤣😂🤣 the Middle East has been the weakest region on Earth since the beginning.
ОтветитьThe only ones who fight just wars are idiots.
That's why the cold war was cold because the USSR and USA were equal in terms of firepower that's why neither of them wanted direct war with each other.
I just start blocking people no matter who they are
ОтветитьAbout Operation Urgent Fury, one of my friends who was a former CH-53 pilot was a part of the campaign. He even sent me a photo of a CH-46 lifting from the assault ship based near the island.
ОтветитьThe duty of a military leader is to ensure that a war is ended as quickly as possible with as few casualties to his own men as feasible, therefore, it is the moral imperative of a military leader to use every tool he has at his disposal to remove the ability and/or the will of his enemy to keep fighting so as to minimize the length of the conflict and the casualties suffered by his troops, hence, there is no such thing as an unfair fight since the most fair thing any commander can do is to ensure the survival of his men.
As such, this should be called the most unbalanced or poorly matched wars since what you've ultimately described were conflicts where one side was outnumbered, outgunned or both by the other.
Shame they didnt get the Falklands conflict on there.
ОтветитьSounds like America and England can't stop having wars with little countries 😂😂. I kinda get why sooooo many people are against western society now
ОтветитьThe thumbnail is giving off mad "Obviously, you don't own an air fryer" energy
Ответитьi'd buy it but my parents wont let me
ОтветитьT-72 and T-80 were both state of the art, or as close as the Russians could produce at the time of Desert Storm. Ironically, that's still true. Yeah, yeah; I can hear "but T-90", the counter to that is it's just an upgraded T-72. They even forgot to upgrade the drive train, which is why both tanks are extremely slow in reverse, which causes a lot of losses.
But US planners were scared shitless because of the reputation the T-72 had. According to information from the Russians, the tanks were every bit as good as our Abrams. The Abrams only entered service a few years after the T-72, and both started development around the same time.
The T-72 is still used in a front line, main battle tank role by a bunch of countries including Russia.
Brazil 🇧🇷🇧🇷
Ответить"If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck."
Lt. Col. Allen West
Australia VS Emus
ОтветитьIn the words of compatriot852 “Definitely ‘fair’ and ‘balanced’ matchmaking”
ОтветитьI swear your voice and your face do NOT match at all. It's fascinating, almost unsettling, and I want to delve into your genetic code and history to figure how how this came to be. I'll be needing a hair sample.
ОтветитьThe 1898 Battle of Manila Bay is so one-sided, we often label it in our history as a "mock battle"
ОтветитьThe Anglo-Zanzibar War: Lasts only 38 minutes
Average battle in a CoD game: Amateurs
I love your channel keep up the great stuff
ОтветитьGod damnit, now this channel is ruined forever to.
Stop showing your faces, it ruins the image forever