Handbrake x264 "Constant Quality" (RF) comparisons

Handbrake x264 "Constant Quality" (RF) comparisons

MGpowered

11 лет назад

86,393 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@DivergentDroid
@DivergentDroid - 23.10.2023 15:03

I don't see a lot of talk about other settings. 22 RF. I use Placebo for speed, Tune is Film as opposed to none, Profile is High444, and Encoder level at 6.2, I get the smallest size possible without sacrificing quality. Auto or Main will give you a slightly larger file size. Film and encoder level also effects file size by shrinking it. Constant or Peak framerate don't make a difference. I use Handbreak to shrink my videos before upload. You can fit a lot of information in 1 minute. I got that down to 2.23 MB's.

Ответить
@KeithBlade
@KeithBlade - 20.02.2021 23:54

Great stuff Matt, your website has always been helpful also for encoding.

Ответить
@psijacko
@psijacko - 08.01.2021 06:39

excelente comparacion, aunque se nota mas la diferencia en escenas de accion o con imagen granulada.

Ответить
@SuganthanHarmless
@SuganthanHarmless - 18.07.2020 09:51

Thank you

Ответить
@supersoccrstar
@supersoccrstar - 30.04.2020 07:56

I don't notice a difference. They all look the same to me. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

Ответить
@simonghoul3602
@simonghoul3602 - 08.05.2018 02:18

This is the best video about this

Ответить
@simonghoul3602
@simonghoul3602 - 19.02.2018 07:02

made a typo when you mentioned "weak settings", you said RF 22, 24, 26

Ответить
@LolaRiMax
@LolaRiMax - 13.12.2017 07:11

love ya <3

Ответить
@JuliaEditz
@JuliaEditz - 11.11.2017 20:16

Super helpful! Thank you :)

Ответить
@bccabernet
@bccabernet - 30.03.2017 08:25

I've just started ripping my collection and was trying to figure Handbrake out. I've been doing well using presets, but not understanding what any of the settings meant.. until I found your videos/website. And I didn't think I needed to until I started converting my PAL shows into NTSC. I followed someone's settings and was shocked at how much larger each episode was compared to the others. And it all had to do with the kbps set to 5000 (I had no idea it altered the file size). Now, armed with knowledge, I can figure out a better setting. Thank you. I am so happy I found your site.

Ответить
@mattsinclair3200
@mattsinclair3200 - 28.12.2016 18:49

VERY HELPFUL VIDEO!!! Thank you!

Ответить
@roontunes
@roontunes - 28.11.2016 20:03

thanks, what does RF actually mean ?

Ответить
@mag_and
@mag_and - 02.11.2016 00:16

In handbrake, if I load an mkv file and only change the codec (from h.265 to h.264.) at 0 RF - the output should theoretically be lossless from the source, right?

Ответить
@procyonlotor5678
@procyonlotor5678 - 10.08.2016 10:05

Dammit so less is better right? Smaller file size I suppose

Ответить
@Pap3rPlane
@Pap3rPlane - 23.04.2016 09:26

Very well explained.

Ответить
@TheSalami
@TheSalami - 14.04.2016 00:30

NOOO CHLOE

Ответить
@DrxSlump
@DrxSlump - 16.11.2015 11:22

22 is close to the perfect balance in my opinion.

Ответить
@TechandDesign
@TechandDesign - 16.11.2015 01:30

nice job bro. thanks

Ответить
@amusement420
@amusement420 - 02.02.2015 01:09

Nice comparison and web page. Handbrake's site says (although it's 3yrs old) Standard Definition (e.g DVD's) Use an RF value of around 20 +/- 1. (20 being the default) High Definition (e.g Blurays 720/1080) Use an RF value of 22 +/- 1. (I think that's too much in one test I did) I used MakeMKV to rip a BR Title which looked fine in VLC. But was squashed anamorphic. Handbrake made it anamorphic. I used the film setting. Your site's reported 355.6MB file size is good.

Ответить
@danielscissorhands
@danielscissorhands - 09.09.2014 08:22

I don't understand your video... isn't the higher the number the better quality? Like RF 20 is better quality than RF 18, right?

Ответить
@Najvalsa
@Najvalsa - 30.05.2014 18:32

SD RF = 21
HD RF = 23

Ответить
@fishingprize
@fishingprize - 04.04.2014 12:08

What does "RF" mean?

Ответить
@TheMRTIMBUK2
@TheMRTIMBUK2 - 09.03.2014 07:44

This compressor is crazy
It compresses video to 99.97%. 
5.47 Gb = 15.6Mb 
insane

Ответить
@naljor8
@naljor8 - 28.02.2014 01:45

Thank you! Clear :)

Ответить
@allencooperphotos
@allencooperphotos - 02.11.2013 19:12

Thanks for the post! Another newb handbrake user here, trying to figure it all out.

Ответить
@txmgarygygax
@txmgarygygax - 30.10.2013 21:32

Great job - helpful.

Ответить
@firefist235
@firefist235 - 13.10.2013 13:11

very nice :D

Ответить
@DisgruntledPigumon
@DisgruntledPigumon - 01.10.2013 09:19

Thanks for this info. BTW you left the medium setting numbers when you showed the weak settings.

Ответить
@samonge7
@samonge7 - 21.09.2013 00:12

Thaks, this helped a lot!

Ответить
@treighpedroche1516
@treighpedroche1516 - 16.09.2013 19:09

Valuable information. I just recently got into encoding with handbrake and found this comparison of RF quality very useful. Thank you for posting!

Ответить
@DMWill79
@DMWill79 - 03.09.2013 13:49

first, i have to say i'm surprised no one has commented. this is extremely helpful if someone really doesn't understand how constant quality and RF works. it came in handy when i needed to explain to someone why this setting can be very important.

Ответить