The Building Blocks of The Universe - Quarks & Supersymmetry Explained by Brian Greene

Thinking about decorated scientists seriously thinking that these purpose-driven, tailor-made, obviously made-up fairy tale characters actually exist and, in spite of their unconceivably intricate, complicated and counter-intuitive nature, still considering them to be fundamental is the most demotivating thing I can think of. Nature is utterly simple – complicated models are ALWAYS wrong. I’ve been counting down the years for 15 years, and going on counting for another 15-20 until this fundamental failure will be common knowledge.

Conservation of Spatial Curvature:
Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.)

Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree.

String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring?

What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine.

Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957–8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)

The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?

When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.

Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.

Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.
=====================
Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?

Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?

Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons

. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase.

Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length )

The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge.

Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms.

In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.

1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface

137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.

The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)

How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?

Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?

I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
------------

your choice of Zero and a sphere is contentious a well: zero means no thing, could it really mean everything? There is no such thing as a perfect sphere, anything involving pi means that it is imperfect.

Can I use some of this video?

It's Quark as in arc not orc. Why do Americans fuck up the English language all the time?

Quarks are like some sort of liver function of the atom. They transmutate dead ethers or dark energy and/or dark matter into vibrant forces. Maybe they are the mediator between the 4th dimension or aspects of such.

We are a universe experiencing itself

God damn im so high right now. This is 🤯

You say maybe they are too small and have zero mass? Have you ever thought that maybe we just seem to be bigger than them while they are actually even too bigger than us since they are too far from us, we observe them as too small. These two options are still on the table, And being small according to who or which location or which observer? ( since everything can be and have to be divided into two forever there is no zero mass in the universe)

❤️

This video was completed awful and filled with meaningless jargon.

Quantum gravity which holds this universe, which gets bizarre as we go deeper and deeper 😵‍💫😵‍💫

I named all the quarks that make up the particals, that make up the atoms, that make up me "Corkey". They're kinda quirky.

If quarks have no mass, how can they make something toucheble, something with mass???

Brian once said he knows most of the equations of the universe because he feels that he is apart of the universe 🙏🏽 So if we are apart of the universe which everyone is then us humans will in the end know everything about the universe eventually 🙏🏽by George Dean Australia

Halflecs are the building blocks of the universe, Not Quarks! And the data of The Periodic Table of Elements and Isotopes, is the proof!

And to think that man can ever understand what God has created… but as long as we keep trying.

Nice one

Well, I am not going to pretend that I understood all of that. BUT, I can now at least incorporate discussion about 'how the mass of the three (known) quarks that comprise a proton do not equal the mass of that proton and, therefore, it may be the mass of the "gluons" which hold those quarks together that in fact fill that deficit,' into my cocktail hour chit chat. Pray for me that NO ONE asks me to explain any further. Ha!

The Monad is the singularity.

The number associated with the Monad is zero.

The geometric dimension associated with the Monad is zero-dimensional space.

The elementary/fundamental particle associated with the Monad is quarks.

1) no spatial extension
2) zero size
3) exact location only
4) 6000 trillion trillion trillion (39 zeroes after 6k) times stronger than the force of gravity.

0D Monad (SNF)
1D Line (WNF)
2D Plane (EMF)
3D Volume (GF)

"He is the invisible Spirit, of whom it is not right to think of him as a god, or something similar. For he is more than a god, since there is nothing above him, for no one lords it over him. For he does not exist in something inferior to him, since everything exists in him. For it is he who establishes himself. He is eternal, since he does not need anything. For he is total perfection. A being can have a relationship with a God but not the Monad as that would be a contradiction."

— The Apocryphon of John, 180 AD.

Monad

ALIASES

God, Ein Sof, Bythos, the Absolute, The One, Anu-El, The Dreamer, The All-Encompassing, The Reason Why, The Transcendence

AFFILIATION

Everything

PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION

RACE

Emanation of God

GENDER

Non-Binary

PHYSICAL SEX

Sexless

SPIRIT OF

Beginning, End, Principle, Creation, Oneness

RELATIVES

PARENTS

God

"God is an intelligible sphere, whose center is everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere." -ALAN OF LILLE.

Monad is a philosophical idea that was originally conceived by the Pythagoreans to refer to a single source acting alone, to an indivisible origin, which is the beginning of everything and the end of everything. It was later adopted by cosmogony to explain that everything was just part of a supreme being, a divinity that encompasses-all that ever was, is, and potentially will be.

Overview

Monad is more than an entity, it is literally a principle, a thing that is not a thing. It is the EVERYTHING, and anything that was, is, or will be. Anything that ever was was part of Monad, good and evil, and everything that is, was or ever will be also part of Monad, with the universe itself being part of Monad as well.

Although Monad appears to be the same equivalent of God, this is erroneous, as for Plato, the Biblical God would actually be a Demiurge, the Nous, a lesser and imperfect god who created the cosmos. Monad is responsible for emanating the World of Forms, while the Demiurge is responsible for the cosmos.

Appearance

The Monad is represented as a circle with a point inside it within a two-dimensional plane. Everything that can be defined as existent founds itself as part of Monad and anything not of Monad does not exist.

Personality

Monad is totally impersonal, it's an unconscious mind without any personality traits.

so everything is made of other stuff. cool

so much of my future in the past and my past in the future

Did I understand any of this? No. I wonder if I could learn this Science. Age 74. Probably not. Don't speak Math.

"to the lame person..." 🤣

So this means that Dark Matter/Dark Energy works on a Subatomic scale not just outer space, interesting! 🤔🧃

Mathematics is the king of all sciences , what the hell is physics without math 😴

The vast majority of the inner workings of our universe remain unknown.

I love Science Time... 💕

Human Scientists are just exploring the different 'STORIES', within the Earth Program... The Universe including Earth, the human species, and other species, are just a 'STORY', presented in the form of a 'Holographic Simulation', in a very small Display Register, of "The Processing System of LIFE" !

NO THE WAVE FUNCTION IS THE FUNDAMENTAL BLOCK OF THE UNIVERSE

First there was a zero, a true nothing, which ruptured and out of the void then came....
But zero is of course so stable it could never rupture. So I think that zero never existed (??) But any "possible world" requires a beginning if only as mathematical necessity.

The day we will learn how to cut a magnetic and get the same pole is the day we will learn how to devide quarks

So trying to separate quarks is like trying to eliminate the poles of a magnet by cutting it in half. The more you pull apart the magnet the more poles you get

Quarks without dynamics with antimatter, Higgs field contributing to mass, and dark energy calls for an effort to keep balance instead of bringing an awesome fact that's incomplete.

No there is only one quark...He's on Star trek :)>

This doesn't explain anything any better that Brian Greene would explain it. Odd...

Do colors exist if you are blind?

"So, zerooskul says: 'Brian Greene s a charlatan!' Thank you, zerooskul, I appreciate that!" -Prof. Dr. Brian Greene

Can someone pls tell me,
if this whole quarks stuff is a theory and we are still studying it
or we have actual proof of quarks and gluons and their masses
I'm really confused

Nice, but supersymmetry is not real. It’s hypothetical and every one of these physicists said the LHC would discover super symmetric particles as soon as it was turned on. No hint of it has been detected - this is leading physics astray just like string theory has for decades.

For people who are not familiar with most of these terms and numbers, I will break this down in simplistic terms.
Basically when the math doesn't add up we begin to imagine what we think is out there and build around it.

Could quark - gluon interaction (plasma) fill a lot of space in universe?

Are there quark - anti quark pairs (mesons) also outside nucleus of atoms?

Check out Ray Fleming. He's saying, like so many others, that Einstein was wrong and that he ignored his first assumptions that included quantum fluctuations and fields in his models. Ray Fleming is saying that beyond a small number of fundamental particles like protons, neutrons, electrons and photons there are no other particles and that the quantum fields give particles their properties not smaller particles beyond the fundamental ones. No quarks, no neutrinos and no Higgs Boson. It's all lies because these people did not want to disprove their own theories. It is odd that everyone agrees that cosmology is in crisis but no one is willing to start from scratch and find where their theories went off the rails. I am willing to start from scratch and at least consider and work through the problem scientifically. To postulate things that cannot be seen or tested, like dark matter and dark energy is unscientific. Quantum fluctuations and their fields deserve a serious consideration at the very least.

Particles can be divided to infinity silly earthlings..you only have the tech to strip down to quarks but in reality there exists a particle that by comparison would make a quark the size of jupiter vs itself being the size of a quark..but you'll never develop tech that will register one..not even close

This description conjured the image of a holographic reality. It just has a (time) resolution beyond our cognitive capacity (like prime number maze rats).

I've figured out how to change the stars by stopping hurricanes. Don't worry, I've technically already done the easy part and changed the stars. My parents were teachers and for almost 2 decades, they taught their students my constellation. Those kids will teach their kids. So on and so on. See, stars changed.  I just need help to make it legit and with the rest. I need to get to Texas ASAP.  No, I'm not kidding. Yes, I'm serious. I get 7 things. 1 of them being to change the stars and remember, crazy is a compliment.  Will you please help?

TIME is fascinating. I worked the subway stations for nearly 10 years. From one end of the city to the other. Every so often I would notice the city would be saying that, "Today just flew by" or "The day was just dragging along."  How can an entire city complain about the same TIME paradox unless it was effected by it. Maybe a TIME distorted bubble the earth passes through in its revolution around the sun. Maybe random waves of TIME distortion hitting the earth? Maybe they're randomly given off by the sun. Maybe they're from outside our Terran system and reach us in intervals. ???? There is SO MUCH MORE to TIME than we realize.  TI-I-I-IME, is on my side. Yes, it is!