Ted Kaczynski's cause of death revealed

Varg Vlkernes level superiority

TED LIVES

Dead by his own hands. On his own terms.

it’s been 6 months, RIP.

Rest in peace legend. This inhumane system will fall one day.

Rest in peace, legend.

I did not know this till now

CIA

THIS GUY WAS TOO SMART FOR HIS OWN GOOD. WHEN THEY HAD HIM LOCKED UP THEY SHOULD HAVE USED THIS TIME TO PICK HIS BRAIN AND DISCUSS STEERING SOCIETY AND MANKIND IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. ( NOW YOU PEOPLE JUST THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A NICE LONG WHILE )

LIES

Rest in peace, legend

ALL THE LEAVES ARE BROWN🗣🗣🔥🔥❗❗

Poor Ted. They Really Fucked him up with all the LSD they made him take

RIP

Rest in peace

Ted Kaczynski didn’t kill himself

Rest in Peace ✌️ Ted. Will see you on the other side.

They call a con man like Musk a genius ..

Rest in peace, hero of nature, the Freedom Club (FC) will live on! The industrial system will pay for your death!

the CIA killed him

Literally seeing a lot of stuff in hos manifesto coming true and nobody giving a 💩 likely drove him to do it.

Rest in peace.

Rip

Rest in peace

Highly doubt he committed suicide. If he was gonna do that, he would’ve done it a long time ago. Why now after 20+ years and after he’s transferred for medical reasons? Another reason why the media is terrible.

Very fitting for him. RIP!

Hero.

love him or hate him he had the right idea tbh ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

His rise on social media was enough to be put on a hit list to be killed by the fbi😂 Suicide... Yea right

I understand he had terminal cancer and was probably going through unbelievable pain, but I simply cannot understand how he commited suicide in a maximum security prison. He asphyxiated himself to death just like Epstein?

Rip uncle ted u will be greatly missed

You call him a terrorist but your presidents bomb innocent countrys

Rest in Peace big T

People who reach 81 years old did NOT do suicide.

🧢

The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries.

2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.

3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.

4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.

5. In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MODERN LEFTISM

6. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general.

7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists, collectivists, “politically correct” types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much movement or an ideology as a psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by “leftism” will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology. (Also, see paragraphs 227-230.)

8. Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but there doesn’t seem to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do here is indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim to be telling the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is meant to apply to modern leftism only. We leave open the question of the extent to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of the 19th and early 20th centuries.

9. The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call “feelings of inferiority” and “oversocialization.” Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.

FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY

10. By “feelings of inferiority” we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strict sense but a whole spectrum of related traits; low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self- hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have some such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.

11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities and about anything that is said concerning minorities. The terms “negro,” “oriental,” “handicapped” or “chick” for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. “Broad” and “chick” were merely the feminine equivalents of “guy,” “dude” or “fellow.” The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights activists have gone so far as to reject the word “pet” and insist on its replacement by “animal companion.” Leftish anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the world “primitive” by “nonliterate.” They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)

12. Those who are most sensitive about “politically incorrect” terminology are not the average black ghetto- dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any “oppressed” group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class families.

13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc. ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.)

14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.

15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.

16. Words like “self-confidence,” “self-reliance,” “initiative,” “enterprise,” “optimism,” etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone’s problems for them, satisfy everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.

17. Art forms that appeal to modern leftish intellectuals tend to focus on sordidness, defeat and despair, or else they take an orgiastic tone, throwing off rational control as if there were no hope of accomplishing anything through rational calculation and all that was left was to immerse oneself in the sensations of the moment.

Only if he'd have chosen a different, non-violent form rebellion against the establishment, he would have been remembered as a hero. What a tragic outcome, for him and his victims...

I can’t imagine how much this person has suffered through his life and he was a genius before he became what he became

He was considered a genius in his field and had Harvard degrees. it's crazy how someone can have a gift of genius and go this path. He was only caught cause, he told the news if they published his manifesto he would stop his terrorism, The FBI pushed to have his manifesto published so he would stop, because they couldn't catch him. After his manifesto was published, his own brother recognized his writing and reported him to the authorities.

Bro was so smart and had such good points, so sad that he used them for the wrong things. He had some of the best points and views on the internet.

Rip legend

There are many empty holes in this story.
If it was a suicide, how could he do it in supermax prison other than not eating or hitting his head on the wall, it could be real reason but no one knows.
If Government killed him, why now? Why not years ago when he was arrested?
We have two stories that cannot be true, due to lack of evidence or logic.

Rest in peace legend

Rip Ted Kaczynski read his manifesto and audio

RIP Ted :/

Victim of CIA MkUltra program

Just like Epstein..... 🙃🙄

this is lies ted kaczynski was a great man and wouldn’t do such a thing like that the government killed him and then claimed it as “suicide”

He surely didn't killed himself. He mentioned in his letter from last year in January that he has cancer and that he has around 1 or 2 years of life, so he surely didn't killed himself.

So sad that social media killed ted