THE EFFECTIVENESS OF APHE | Simulating the Fragmentation Pattern of Armour Piercing High Explosive

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF APHE | Simulating the Fragmentation Pattern of Armour Piercing High Explosive

SY Simulations

1 год назад

425,776 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@SYsimulations
@SYsimulations - 05.08.2022 17:25

There's a lot to unpack in this video and it took a long time to make, but I hope it answered some questions or was at least fun to watch

Ответить
@TheRealKosmicKing
@TheRealKosmicKing - 05.12.2023 10:48

So basically the more armor the shell goes though, the deadlier the after penetration effect is, but if there’s too much armor then the shell shatters and has little effect on the crew

Ответить
@yeetnoodle9668
@yeetnoodle9668 - 31.08.2023 14:45

How does APHE fuse work?

Ответить
@bobkowalski7655
@bobkowalski7655 - 06.08.2023 03:06

Wait, what do you mean it doesn't nuke the inside of the tank?

-WT players

Ответить
@RADZIO73
@RADZIO73 - 25.06.2023 19:46

what program is that

Ответить
@Ratstalgic
@Ratstalgic - 05.05.2023 04:09

Honestly, this video is genuinely good

Ответить
@holom1838
@holom1838 - 27.04.2023 23:27

SEE GAIJIN? SEE? ITS A CONE A CONE!

Ответить
@johnscreekmark
@johnscreekmark - 24.04.2023 17:02

Devastating round!

Ответить
@obj.071
@obj.071 - 23.04.2023 13:31

gaijuble fans in shambles.

Ответить
@marioandrei8424
@marioandrei8424 - 23.04.2023 04:53

I still don't get how the shell explodes inside the tank. If the tank has less armour it overpens and the shell works like a regular AP round, but if the tank has more armour and it penetrates the shell explodes.
Can somebody explain it to me?

Ответить
@theelephantandtherider9536
@theelephantandtherider9536 - 21.04.2023 10:00

this is amazing.

Ответить
@michal16a
@michal16a - 18.04.2023 22:58

I may not be an expert but APHE should detonate during penetration of thick plates because of fuse being sensitive to distance of penetrated armor not a time or distance after pen. Thats why when armor in vehicle was too thin the fuse would not activate resulting in over penetration

Ответить
@osmacar5331
@osmacar5331 - 14.04.2023 21:14

However British 17pdr ap was only marginally weaker than 88mm PzGr 38 shells, testament to how good we made solid shot,and testament that APHE wasn't as great as gayjoob makes it out to be, only adding more spalling later in the tank. And overpressure (which was the majority of the benefits)

Ответить
@pennycarvalho1223
@pennycarvalho1223 - 12.04.2023 14:59

In my opinion, APHE would have the same exact affects as SOLID shot except for extremely angle penetrations, so with overmatching penetrations, the spall created by the armor shattering would be a lot less deadly when compared to the shrapnel created by the round, given that the spall of the armor would go downwards or upwards, depending on the angle, making it less “forward”. But that’s just my opinion with the limited knowledge that I have gathered through most of my research since I am not a professional.

Ответить
@diegosilva58220
@diegosilva58220 - 10.04.2023 17:28

Its amazing!

Ответить
@velvetthundr
@velvetthundr - 04.04.2023 08:31

This has got to be the most interesting and informative simulation and explanation you've done. This is top notch!

Ответить
@hambo8773
@hambo8773 - 28.03.2023 13:42

What program?

Ответить
@jackmclane1826
@jackmclane1826 - 23.03.2023 22:36

Imagine sitting in a building with that grenade coming through the wall at 250 m/s going past you. It explodes and effectively slowing down the base plate to standstill. Dropping it at your feet... ^^ How absurd!

Ответить
@wulfleyn6498
@wulfleyn6498 - 18.03.2023 10:35

Really does show that war thunders way of simulating aphe is just inaccurate.

Ответить
@DaWhiteGibusman
@DaWhiteGibusman - 14.03.2023 15:02

meanwhile in WT: F I R E B A L L O F D E A T H

Ответить
@Nahuel_Luna
@Nahuel_Luna - 07.03.2023 05:37

and this is why a t34 volatilizes when shot by a jadgtiger

Ответить
@user-qt2gm9ty3p
@user-qt2gm9ty3p - 17.02.2023 12:11

Game please

Ответить
@vannlo355
@vannlo355 - 13.02.2023 04:03

Oh my goodness, 128mm does not play around

Ответить
@bestamerica
@bestamerica - 07.02.2023 20:13

'
did TNT inside the bullet round inside the tank

Ответить
@rubenwell
@rubenwell - 03.02.2023 20:07

ouch

Ответить
@johnroscoe2406
@johnroscoe2406 - 03.02.2023 01:44

Best armor no armor :D

Ответить
@adamgr1984
@adamgr1984 - 31.01.2023 18:19

This channel is like mobile game adverts... Avatar always shows totally different things vs actual movie clips.

Ответить
@lance_the_avocado9492
@lance_the_avocado9492 - 20.01.2023 17:23

Awesome video!

Ответить
@krellio9006
@krellio9006 - 20.12.2022 09:56

Whats cool about this All german APHE shells Tip have high hardness
so when the HE explodes the tip still goes forward damaging anything in front of it (Most of the time engines)

Ответить
@volvo245
@volvo245 - 02.12.2022 12:41

Entry hole: Ms. APHE just entering college
Exit hole: Ms. APHE I'm a career woman ready to settle down.

Ответить
@Fat_
@Fat_ - 28.11.2022 09:56

I have a question that what happen when APHE round cannot penetrate the armour.
I think it should explode inside the armour plate but will this cause more damage to the plate than normal AP?

Ответить
@peasant8246
@peasant8246 - 27.11.2022 11:53

This makes me curious about whether the amount of spall produced by the plate depends on the residual velocity of the projectile? Would be interesting to see a pair of simulations showing the effect on the rear of the plate at 110% and 150% ballistic limit velocity.

Ответить
@MikeHunt-rw4gf
@MikeHunt-rw4gf - 26.11.2022 16:00

Algorithm.

Ответить
@charakiga
@charakiga - 21.11.2022 14:20

Slow fragmentation or not, when a shell explodes next to you you’re not gonna have a good time anyways.

Ответить
@lewcrowley3710
@lewcrowley3710 - 18.11.2022 23:02

You picked a rather large cavity APHE. One and a half pounds of explosive? A more interesting FEA would be a garden variety 7,5 cm PzGr 39. It just had 17 gms of HE I think. Target being a garden variety sherman and T34.

Ответить
@lordfrostdraken
@lordfrostdraken - 17.11.2022 14:56

These simulations are actually wack mate. This is incredible

Ответить
@peasant8246
@peasant8246 - 10.11.2022 14:37

I have another idea for a video like this one: can you make a series of simulations where a given shell is striking the target at the same velocity. Every target has the same LoS thickness but is sloped differently. So, something like 7.5cm PzGr.39 at 800m/s against 100mm LoS targets: 50mm/60°, 42mm/65° etc. to see whether the sloped armour keeps increasing in effectiveness or if there is some point of diminishing returns.

Ответить
@bigsteve6200
@bigsteve6200 - 10.11.2022 08:47

How about an 18" Shell against 16" Turrent Amor.

Ответить
@keamu8580
@keamu8580 - 05.11.2022 05:11

Your videos are greatly appreciated!

Ответить
@CoLiC2
@CoLiC2 - 04.11.2022 19:11

The ultimate "Buenos Dias and goodbye!"

Ответить
@noahsawesomevids422
@noahsawesomevids422 - 20.10.2022 23:13

Cool can you do an 183 t57 t40 Sherman rocket either 183mn Ap or 183HE rocket from the t40 Sherman

Ответить
@burningsinner1132
@burningsinner1132 - 20.10.2022 16:03

Explosion is not starting from the middle though. Fuse is built in a way to start the explosion from the tip, directing the expansion to back as hard as possible.
You still get the wave dragged forward, but it's nowhere near as bad as it looks here.

Ответить
@AsthmaQueen
@AsthmaQueen - 16.10.2022 22:39

This sim reminds me of no armour is best armor against apfsds

Ответить
@taskfroce80th95
@taskfroce80th95 - 14.10.2022 11:05

TL:DR the crew is not going to have a good time

Ответить
@owenschnell5414
@owenschnell5414 - 11.10.2022 20:32

What program is this

Ответить
@Peppabot
@Peppabot - 07.10.2022 09:11

500 grams of explosives feels almost blasphemous 😂

Ответить
@stanleymaestas5441
@stanleymaestas5441 - 03.10.2022 06:12

Must be a howitzer artillery round 🤔

Ответить
@jamesharding3459
@jamesharding3459 - 26.09.2022 20:20

Very interesting! The fragmentation effect of APHE is usually considered to be a spherical, but it’s clearly more conical — which tracks with British interwar testing.

Ответить
@ycplum7062
@ycplum7062 - 16.09.2022 06:03

It will keeell. lol

Ответить