Комментарии:
this actually really helped
ОтветитьTHis is Goldmine 😅😂
ОтветитьHow is this not a lawsuit???
ОтветитьWTF did I just watch? 😂
ОтветитьThere's a short trick. You can perform the normal integration like when u do with x. It will become (3x-1)^5/5 and then divide it with the coefficient of x that is 3. And get the answer
ОтветитьU rule? Power rule
Ответитьfriendship ended with chain rule*, now *u-sub is my best friend
ОтветитьWait this actually makes sense?!!???
ОтветитьI can teach Jenna something too. How to get pleasure.
Ответить"hey ho look"
Ответитьpascal triangle taking a break here i see
ОтветитьWtf this is awesome haha
ОтветитьThis helped me more than my calculus professor
Ответитьmanual integration is such a waste of time. Just use mathmatica or wolfram alpha.
ОтветитьWhy didn't I have AI during my college time? So daaaaamm good to review it years later
Ответитьdon't be a goofy gooner 🤣🤣🤣
ОтветитьCool I still don't get it
ОтветитьDamn Obama is good in Calculus?
ОтветитьI would have learned this stuff so much easier if I had AI celebrities teaching it to me.
ОтветитьWhy?
ОтветитьWell if this is how gen alpha learns math, so be it
Ответитьstep 2. because the real world doesn't allow for perfect functions, how can we derive a governing differential equation so that after numerical analysis, the result resembles this.
Ответитьusing linear substitution w can directly integrate it by letting x= 3x+1
which implies
integral (3x+1)^4 dx => {(3x+1)^5}/{3*5} + C
=> {(3x+1)^5}/15 +C
Tf did i just watch?
Ответитьthanks mr president
ОтветитьObama is NOT that smart.
ОтветитьWe’re making it out of calc 2 with this one 🗣️🔥
ОтветитьIs this how GenAlpha kids learn math??? 🤣🤣🤣
ОтветитьYea sorry im to dumb to even understand this 💀
Like what am i even trying to learn bro i barely know algebra
Obama 🤝 Ortega
ОтветитьI learned this the hard way but when using u-substitution if the u' expression still has the variable in it it has to divide out somehow or it won't work. EX: u = 3^2 + 1 would require an x on the outside of the parenthesis or x * (3x^2+1)^4 for it to work.
ОтветитьNice, but I can't substitute U will anything else
ОтветитьWow. I am really dumb.
ОтветитьWe can expand the bracket using Binomial Theorem .
ОтветитьBrain nourishment fr
ОтветитьThis would've helped me in calculus in uni 😂
ОтветитьI got confused 😭 I’m a year 10 (9th grader)
Ответитьcalcmaxxing
ОтветитьI passed calculus 1 with 92% then didn't even get enough to be allowed to take exams for statistics 💀
ОтветитьIs it really Jenna Ortega?
ОтветитьZena Neutrino knows her calculus!
ОтветитьCalculus isn’t very hard (at least 1 2 and 3) but it takes people some time to process these things for the first time
ОтветитьLet's take a critical analysis of the displayed equation, let's y = (3x - 1)^(4) using the integration approach a^(n) ≈ (1/(n+1))*a^(n + 1) via substitution, so let u = 3x - 1 || u^(4) || u' = (1/5)*u^(5) || we have to also integrate the integrable variables in u, so 3x - 1 ≈ (3/2)*x^(2) - x and multiply it by the integral of u, giving us ((3/2)*x^(2) - x)*(1/5)*u^(5), it should be noted that we have to replace the original value of u = 3x - 1 into our eqn. to get our final answer ((3/2)*x^(2) - x)*(1/5)*(3x - 1)^(5)
ОтветитьI think we're gonna be alright.
ОтветитьJust multiply and divide by 3
ОтветитьThis is the worst it will ever be
ОтветитьThis made more sense than my actual calculus class lol
ОтветитьCalm down it's just u' u^a classic power derivative 🤣🤣🤣🤣
ОтветитьWhat the fuck just happened
ОтветитьObama was similar to The Rock
Ответить