Комментарии:
All the gear and no idea 🤣🤣🤣😊
ОтветитьI have the mic100 , would it be ok to use for vocals in a home studio ? Thx for yhe review
ОтветитьCan i use this for my guitar? My audio interface always clipping even with 0 gain knob. I think my pickups are too hot. I need to reduce the gain signal.. i have no idea lol
Ответить¿Qué polaridad tiene el cargador?
ОтветитьThanks for the video! Very helpful for me
ОтветитьConclusion : BEHRINGER is too bassy -- no clarity - SM57 into interface is best
ОтветитьHello, masterful demonstration, greetings.
ОтветитьTerima kasih sharingnya
ОтветитьYou sure save me money .
ОтветитьSalut marco . Je me suis acheter un sm57 pour faire de voice over, vocal pour publicité etc . As tu un preamp de vocal en tete qui fitterais bien avec un sm57 et pop filter. Justilise un tascam us16x08. Merci et bonjour de Sherbrooke, Quebec
Ответитьyou want cheap you'll get cheap sound
ОтветитьThere you go. lol brilliant thank you :)
ОтветитьYou've got some obvious distortion on the SM 57, can't you hear that?
ОтветитьSo just change a lamp in Ultragain 12AX -> 12AU and you will hear a DIFFERENCE.. owesome
ОтветитьVery and I mean very interesting and valuable information Congrats believe me I was able to hear the difference even my iPhone speakers and there is when a Tutorial or demo like this becomes interesting 🧐 thank you for sharing
ОтветитьWhat is that wobbly sound at the end of every sample?
Ответитьcould you compare the Focusrite Scarlett gen3 vs the MIC100
ОтветитьThe Behringer MIC100 with the Shure SM57 hisses like my cheap ebay TU04 mixer.
ОтветитьThis video is unfortunately not usable for any fair comparison due to the really weird things going on to the audio during the test. Really appreciate the effort and all the work going in to making a video like this though.
ОтветитьRME, because I own one. (:
ОтветитьWhat thats weird digital, almost modulation sound going on? Sounds like super low bitrate but digital crackling or something?
ОтветитьWonderful video! Thanks for doing this. However, I found the stock tube was noisy in my Behringer MIC100 so back when I first bought it, I put a vintage RCA made in USA tube in and it's been nice and quiet for me. Also when testing sweeps and pink noise I am not seeing any loss of high frequencies at all. I do see a very small drop on the low end at 20hz though - so small I don't hear it and nothing I record goes that low - but my test equipment shows the small dip. I'm pretty surprised at how well it works for such an inexpensive preamp.
ОтветитьWatch @ 1.5X You're welcome.
Ответитьgood to know..
ОтветитьI think the noise with the SM-57 is basically electromagnetic interspersion into the mic's coil. I've used some SM-57 near a tramway line and they picked up surprisingly much of the electromagnetic noise. However, thank you for the great review!
ОтветитьLove the organ sound during the unwrap.
ОтветитьExclent video, thank you so much!
ОтветитьNice u said but pls check recorded guitar sound, I not getting proper sound reflection because of the guitar, pls check it
ОтветитьHI marco primeau, currently i have the mbox pro 3 (3rd gen) and I think its quiet old. Should I buy a new interface like SSL 2 or audient id4? is there any different that I can get from this new kind of interface? Tq for suggestion
ОтветитьIve got a sm57 to mic my cabinet for electric guitar, got a old line6xt live I can use as an interface, of course signal for mic is too low. Im between buying a budget pre amp to solve this, or would you recommend to buy a new interface like a focusrite 2i2?
ОтветитьLoL I am willing to bet you're the organ player Mr Primeau
Ответитьisa sounds better than uad
ОтветитьMic200 all the way
Ответить