Комментарии:
Easy install, great to use
Ответитьwhy stop at 29? the 48" Singer Extraordinary high wheel bicicle of 19 century (150 years ago) would never stop at any rock and pass all the bumps like non-existent. The 29 folks solve all the problems by using obsolete technology.
ОтветитьNice graphic animation work
ОтветитьThis is misleading. Smaller wheels would travel a longer distance through a hole yes. But your inertia determines the bike's speed. Wheels don't track the ground at a constant velocity like the animation suggests.
ОтветитьLa 26 scompare 🤣😂🤣😂
ОтветитьI always go to 26
Ответитьlooooooooooool
ОтветитьIf two sleeping pills work good... Then the whole bottle will REALLY help you sleep.
ОтветитьNot mentioned, of course, is the fact that you're trying to churn 8 lbs. of tires around on a bike that weighs 50 lbs.
ОтветитьHow about speed time video animation?
ОтветитьAnyone remembering those bikes with the huge front wheels they used in the late 19th century? They must have been far far ahead of us...
ОтветитьAlthough simplified, i do believe this. I cannot compete with my 29er HT times on strava when i’m riding my older 26er HT. Subjectively it feels smoother, objectively it goes faster.
ОтветитьКлассное видео! Инженерная мысль не нуждается в переводе и комментарии!
Ответитьda notare anche che la 26 è piú stretta e leggera a velocità piú elevate e con raider piú bravi è molto piú agile a superare/saltare gli ostacoli
Ответить26 all the way faster acceleration more agile and a lot lighter than 29s
Ответитьale komercyjny gniot przemysłu rowerowego
ОтветитьRetarded video lolz
ОтветитьQue tonteria .ahora la 26 de toda la vida ya no srve pa mierda.y cuando saquen la 32 la 29 tambien se atasca .toca vender la idea como sea no?
Ответитьmisleading information
ОтветитьSo they only test the attack angle.....what about weight, manuelity, the frame,?????
Ответить26 good. From Russia :)
ОтветитьI ride 27.5 wheel MTB, fast in accelaration, good for turnings, but i respect 29ers, it depends on how you manage your stirring, 29er is fine, it's the attitude that sucks. 😜
ОтветитьThat's a beginners animation.
Ответить29 just don't look OK. I saw one friend once with 29 and he looked like he is riding a tank or a truck, like a... strange animal that was lost and cant find the way back to his natural habitat, like a sea turtle on the highway. And he looked so focused and stiff on that thing like some grandmother. I don't mean to offend anybody. As for the 27.5 is this +1.5 inches so important? Its not like we talking about our dicks right :)
Ответитьhow about 27.5
Ответитьthe 26er getting stuck is very unrealistic. I suppose this video was made with bias.
Ответить26er+140+mm travel+2.35-.5 tires+16"frame=???
ОтветитьNewbie went to the shop: tried three bikes on a 10 minutes journey each, disregard sellers opinion and purchased the most comfortable and easy to ride bike. One month later I realised that it is a 29er
ОтветитьFunny how the video is 29 seconds long
Ответитьkkkkkk
ОтветитьNow show tight technical turns.
ОтветитьGo for 50
ОтветитьOnly pussies ride 29"
ОтветитьPeople think that 29er are stupid, but i think thet they look stupid trying to chase me.
ОтветитьLets all agree
29ers look stupid.
Only ok if you ride xc
Any bike with travel more than 140mm should be 26er or 27.5.
Ps DH for life
What a bullshit, this animation proves nothing. Just go riding and don´t worry about numbers!
Ответитьwhat a pathetic video.... there are a lot of advantages but this videos certainly is sad..
ОтветитьI just bought Cube 29er. On a straight road I reached maximum speed of 40 km/h. With a 26 "bike I was not able to drive faster than 35 km/h.
ОтветитьWhy settle for 29" then? If bigger is better.... Go for the 29.5" or 30", or even 31"
Ответитьyou need longer suspension on 26 then 29
ОтветитьI wanted one already. Now I really want one.
Ответить29ers are the OLD MAN'S BIKE! Nice and smooth like a wheel chair.
Ответить"Eliminating riders influence" - This is pointless, it shows nothing, the rider is the main bit, without a rider they would just fall over!
Ответитьeso no prueba absolutamente nada, tal vez el desplazamiento de una 26 no sera tan amplio como el de una 29 (obvio) sin embargo las 29 carecen de maniobrabilidad. pesimo video
ОтветитьSo the 29er is gay? That just confirms my suspicions. Nothing wrong if that's how you spread your butter. :-)
ОтветитьThat proves nothing. You wanna go faster, smoother, better? Stop worrying about numbers and just ride your bike more!
ОтветитьOkay so you have shown us some lame rolling ability of the two wheel sizes. but honestly, I know and so do you, it comes down to the rider at the end of the day not the wheel size. Why is it man has a fixation on trying to make everything easier in this world? What happened to actually working for it? As another posted, I want to feel shit under my tyres, if I didnt I may as well go ride a road bike. Im not against it, just not for me. But I hate it how the industry keep trying to tell us its better, its not. Dont mess with a good thing. 26" has been working just fine for a long time. Marketing hype is just that, hype. People will make up their own mind, and ill stay true to 26" for as long as I can.
ОтветитьEl domingo hice 30 km subiendo y bajando por senderos estrechos y pistas con mi Specialized Epic Elite 2011 y la maniobrabilidad y aceleración que ofrece una 26" no creo que lo consiga una 29", quizá una 27.5"...¡¡¡Larga vida a las 26!!!
Ответить