AMD Frame Generation vs NVIDIA Frame Generation - Which Works Better?

Rtx 4070 bast

ngl AMD pretty fcking impressive, even if AMD FG is not implemented yet and still got over 80%+ lol

fsr3 is in beta phase , there is nothing to compare , it's not even included in the game, so the comparaison is not relevant

Why different app for measuring fps ?

AMD doesn't have frame generation

Se papearon a Nvidia, gente.

Will it be good if people use dlss 3.5 on a nvidia rtx 30 series gpu then use Amd frame generation without using fsr 2.1 or even fsr 3.0

Comparing them is wrong frame generation is on driver and it's still in beta honestly it's not useful to compare YET

This is not fsr 3 frame generation that uses motion vectors and is implemented in game, this is using a beta version of fluid motion frames that not going to be fully released until next year. Cyberpunk has not implemented AMDs Frame generation yet.

These all make me lol. These pc comparisons where they all look exactly the same. You should swap the video screens round one day. I guarantee no one would notice. You're all just looking at the numbers.

Impressive performance 🔥

Looks like amd's card without fg looks better than nvidia's also without fg.

Only a 2730 clock speed on the 4070 definitely one of the lowest I've ever seen,just for comparison mine runs at 2810 with no oc ,not that it would make a huge difference but just saying

i can't play cyberpunk WITHOUT RT Overdrive/path tracing after trying it out so for now looks like 4070 was a good choice at $500 but without path tracing or higher RT the 7800xt would be better. i just can't imagine playing a single player game without the maximum amount of ray tracing your card can handle. Competitive games are different story i guess but both do fine there.

Амд на дне

But am seeing more fps gain with amd

Both fake frames are bad. Native better

Amd frame generation is juss a marketing gimmick

Sorry AMD i am still in love with NVIDIA GPU 😂😂😂 BUT FOR CPU I CHOOSE AMD 😂😂😂

Hang on a minute, this is AMD motion frames, DRIVER level Frame Gen, NOT fsr 3, which uses motion vectors, ABIT of an unfair comparison lol

Here we see to many of nvidia titles. If the games were feairly optimized for AMD, then everything was different.

The RTOD/PT strictly developed with Nvidia partnership.

But team green have Ray Reconstruction 😎

Perfect comparison between the advantages of AMD and Nvidia at the same price point.

ive got rx 7000 series card but idk how to enable it, just release this shit for newest gen already then have fun trying to implement it on cards without ai cores

интересно бы посмотреть на карту от зеленных с фср3 и генерацией кадров, например 3080

Obviously nvidia is top tier and always will be. DUH!! Smh 🤦🏻 broke boys can’t afford nvidia. 😁

Cyberpunk game was made to showcase Nvidia rtx GPUs, no doubt it's such a bad optimized game ...

This lets us see how AMD is very far from having the graphic performance with ray lighting that the green team can provide us.

Both technologies are great my only problem is thay are not meant for performance uplife as the game engine is not creating this frames

전성비 N win ~

AMD Fluid Motion Frames Revisited= FG ??

What is this new blue overlay?

About time but still needs work. At higher settings Nvidia begins to just cook AMD

How come you have fsr 3 and fg from amd?

So much data covers half of the already tiny screen part and you expect us to see differences. Here we only need fps info to compare.

Love lisa
A girl makes better job than a clown who dont care about the consumers

Its not a freaking framegen with amd. This comparison is nonsense for now.

AFMF is a Beta version. it is going to be even better.

AMD: I tried so hard and got so far
But in the end, it doesn't even matter
I had to fall to lose it all
But in the end, it doesn't even matter

Another win for NVIDIA. Useless FSR3 don't give the smoothness of DLSS3. And input lag of FSR3 is insane.... crappy software this FSR3

RTX ON as always💚

The thing is that the AFMF is only software is not implemented yet in the game unlike nvidia's frame generation which may result in worse results for AMD

fg on=pc latency off. It's nice to see how the frametime is not stable at all.

Nvidia always better

the only thing in which amd beat nvidia is the PRICE but clearly losing in raytracing performance...but amd is closing up i guess...all the best amd

I heard some 🤡 saying that amd is trash isnt good for rt, look at the benchmarks 1440p ultra with rt on + fsr 3 fg getting 90+fps. Now some fanboys will point out path raytracing 😂 which good but 99% people wont use path ray tracing while playing, how many games have path raytracing ? All those say who point out missing thing from amd like rt, dlss,fg, because they are nvidia fanbois who doesnt want to try amd.

fg and afmf are not the same thing. fg will be much better and much more useful than afmf