The OVERBET BLUFF - HIGH STAKES POKER TAKES with Daniel Negreanu 02

Can someone explain to me why the King of Spade is the nuts here? Sorry, I’m new to the game.

The entire video is worth it just for the shot of Ivey giving Daniel that look when he raises in the very beginning.

I really enjoy your analysis videos. Just a quick question that intrigues me: why do you refer to yourself in third person? "We decide to raise...." for example. Just curious 🙂

Slot streamers typically make their money by playing with bonus/comped funds by the platform provider in exchange for exposure and new sign-ups. Slot machines are not a long term winner, they will on average retain 8% of all wagers over their lifecycle

Top of the line
Kid Poker is great

What was the physical read?

Daniel Negreanu really is the best thing that could happen to Poker. Thank you.

What would brusen say

Tough one.

I'm not sure you over betting with flush when the board pair...

who is the meatloaf to whom gabe refers? i'm guessing eric persson? i guess he busted out and left under a cloud?

ok so you can either explain why you played this hand by GTO or explo perspective, not them both at the same time. PIO doesn't ever overbet river in this scenario. Almost no sets are being bet on this turn by PIO, except of aces and mostly for 1/3rd pot. Taking it into consideration - overbetting river doesn't make too much sense and is just an exploit vs passive and unawere opponent.

The problem here Daniel is that you would never have bet less than 25% of the pot on the flop with Ks or set, you were lucky your opponent didn't seem to consider that in the end. You also give your own tells when you're bluffing. Not anymore as much as 10+ years ago, but they are still there.

Holy shit

WTF Daniel

This is the kind of hand where if Daniel had it, all the Hole Card Cam wizards would say, "he's never bluffing in this spot!!" No, you're never bluffing in that spot, donk.

You can have any hand and you clearly do have any hand your bluffing here so your bluffing range is sizeable.

If you call there, you are wrong, you win, but you are wrong, lmao

you are never ever betting that much with just the Ks. And if you are, that's terrible. just terrible.

Vegan impossible burger 🤣🤣

Danny pretty much knows your two hole cards, even before you do. Not only have Ive seen him call opponents two hole cards example being 7-8, he called 7-spades,8-spades, before turn card was displayed. Called nurmeric card symbol, also suit within both hole cards.

Hultman''s flop call was a big mistake. He absolutely should've raised full pot it isolate someone. Flop comes the flush, he's against 2 players and there's only 10k in pot.

I call that every time, that's why I'm not a pro lol

I missed the tell.

Can't believe he folded a flush

Coming back to poker after 12 years, it's interesting to see that Daniel finally decided to fix the physical tells he used to give out. Such a different posture from the early seasons of hsp.

I dont see any solver betting sets OTT bluffs are hands with big spade and huge checking. you just did magic and it worked.

You should keep your eyes on Ivey in the last part. How he is seriously scanning the situation. GOAT

Daniel, the problem with saying that we are all wrong about you not having a full house or quads is that it doesn't matter what your actual range is, it matters what your opponent perceives it to be. You know your opponent better than we do but if many of us think you wont have a full house, then wouldn't many of your opponents think that as well?

wonderful punishment of the preflop calling. Hero Dnegs

Is Daniel really betting the Ks for that sizing tho? To get called by what? He would more like bet 3/4rd or Pot.. Hultman still has all fullhouses on the river.. So Dnegs range is basically just fullhouse or quads

Phil Ivey always seems to know when Daniel is bluffing…that look though

thanks for the video .great stuff especially as i watch kim s slot stream made it such fun

Since i can see the cards, i woulda raised the turn if i was holtzman, ida rasised it if i couldn't see them too.

The other thing is that people know dan just loves suited connectors, i mean who doesn't right? But doyle especially knows dan will play the little ones, that board coulda really hit dan hard.

Sometimes i give up value for the nutted overbet bluff. If i have the nuts i try to make it look like a bluff, they usually fold, but the next time when im actually bluffing i make it look like a value bet and they fold too.

You definitely can't be all loosy goosy eating a sandwich playing this game

All this analysis means a lot to someone like Ivey or Brunson or Dwan or Patrick. But I am 100% that the slot machine gambler did not think about all these when he folded. He just thought on a paired board his J high flush is not good. So Fold.

Is Bovada poker or any online poker legit now in the US?

Good point that the commentator made about the board pairing and Daniel still betting heavy

Me watching high stakes poker makes me dream that maybe we will bring back the big game

Poker odds are fun sometimes, Hultman didn’t even have a pair but mathematically had the best hand against 2 opponents.

Side note he folded because everyone knows Daniel plays 8-7😜

The way DAniel thinks about his hand is the way my EX wants to talk to me on why I don't want to go to church on Sundays

dude you look like a hipster wim hof

Cost of a vegan impossible burger 🤣 so it cost a dollar or 99 cents more than I would pay for that burger☺️

eyelashes on flique!

Genius play and exceptional read until you get called and stack off like you have in the past.

Proffs visar var skåpet ska stå för lilla amatören

Why can’t he have queen of spades, I find it hard to understand why people can or can’t have certain cards, is there a good reference I can read up on on readin ranges and understanding your own, thanks!