Комментарии:
Nights before my exams 🫡🤍
ОтветитьA Things Brought Things Ruppess 60 Six Pen Give Taxe ofOne Pen is Only Six Ruppess.
Ответитьwhy did he put the seller portion in oragne above the 5.60 if the price never reached 6$? wouldnt it make more sense to put the sellers tax obligation below to display the cutting into profit?
Ответитьa level exam tomorrow, thanks lol
ОтветитьAmazing! May Allah guide you Ameen.
ОтветитьYouve gained a subscriber. Keep up the great videos!
ОтветитьI appreciate this. I finally understand because of you. Thank you so much😭
Ответитьthere are theoretical flaws in this illustration
ОтветитьFuck uuuuuuuuuuuuu
Ответитьare u teaching us or yourself baby
ОтветитьWow, bless you for posting these videos! Such a help :)
ОтветитьSorry, but this is dead wrong. You get your numbers messed up sir. Consumers pay .40c while producer pays .60c. Anyone else found this confusing?
ОтветитьExcellent video on topic! Wish you were my Econ professor! ;-)
ОтветитьThank you! You rock!
ОтветитьIsn't this subsidies and not taxes???
ОтветитьThank you!!!!!!!!!
ОтветитьThis looks wrong to me, the original price was $5, which was paid by the consumer, however it has risen to $5.60, thus this is the incidence of taxation on the consumer. So of the $1, $0.60 is paid by the consumer. However there is $0.40 to be paid. This is paid by the producer, however it falls below the consumer incidence, and can be illustrated by a vertical line straight down from the new taxed supply curve to the original/previous supply curve. This would mean that another price of $4.60 should be marked and the distance from $4.60 to $5 is the producer incidence and $5 to $5.60 is the consumer burden/incidence. This also makes sense because the distance between the two supply curves should be $1 as it is an indirect specific tax, causing a parallel shift of $1. However as shown by this gentleman, the producer incidence is above the consumer incidence and beyond the taxed supply curve, which cannot be the case.
ОтветитьThis guide doesn't make sense.
With the new equilibrium price of 5.60, the buyer is paying an extra 60 cents of the 1 dollar tax.
When the supplier earns that 5.60, he has to pay tax on it of 1. Meaning he is left with 4.60.
thank you. now i understand but... please take the music out.
Ответитьit would have been most helpful if the music is not there. I get headaches after 3 seconds.
Ответитьbut isnt what he said was the opposite ?!?!?!
Ответитьi think he meant the opposite !!!
Ответитьthat what i was thinking
ОтветитьEither my text is wrong or this guy is. Check your textbook before you follow this.
ОтветитьThis is really pretty simple. When taxes increase, so does the price of goods sold. When the price of goods sold increases, the demand shrinks. As is typically the case, costs are passed to the consumer.
ОтветитьAnd of course in the case of corporate taxes, the 40 cents taxes payed by the "seller" is really out of the pocket of the stockholders and the additional 60 cents is payed by the buyer of the product. Corporate taxes as a means of 'punishing the rich CEO's" is asinine. Board members don't pay corporate taxes. They pay personal income taxes.
Ответитьis there a video where you actually do the math?
ОтветитьDoesn't the buyer pay 40 ? and the seller 60 ?
ОтветитьYes you have it the wrong way round, the buyer pays 40 and the seller pays 60
ОтветитьYou explain VERY VERY clearly!! Thanks a lotttttttttttttt! Will watch more of your videos. The same: No music will be better. It distracts...Noise in the communication process .
Ответитьthe music is very distracting but I love your stuff otherwise
ОтветитьAll that talking and no algebra ... Tax Incidence theory of a tax is easy, maybe show how you got those numbers?
Ответить