The Population Collapse: Why No One Wants Kids Anymore

The Population Collapse: Why No One Wants Kids Anymore

Cole Hastings

1 месяц назад

132,689 Просмотров

Ссылки и html тэги не поддерживаются


Комментарии:

@CharlieTrahan456
@CharlieTrahan456 - 30.11.2024 11:19

People are terrible for the environment. We need to normalize free sterilization, homosexuality, gay marriage rights, being environmentally responsible by opting to not have children and allowing for people to move, live and work without restrictions any where in the World.

Ответить
@LauraMonk9
@LauraMonk9 - 30.11.2024 10:41

Then explain how humans were totally fine when there was under 600 million people.

Ответить
@smievil
@smievil - 30.11.2024 09:45

where do i even buy kids?
i never saw them in any stores

Ответить
@MaxPlayerNEWS
@MaxPlayerNEWS - 30.11.2024 07:56

Good! I want a balanced fertility rate in world.

Ответить
@CraftyZanTub
@CraftyZanTub - 30.11.2024 07:26

Humanity is a blight on this planet and extinction is its best bet.

Ответить
@LorenSoman
@LorenSoman - 30.11.2024 05:06

Supposedly failed scientific predictions from the 1970's did not cause the current demographic crisis. That is just stupid. The real cause is declining economic growth rates worldwide due to the declining energy return on energy invested in world oil production. As oil costs more and more to get out of the ground, the rising energetic cost of oil production leaves less and less useful energy to create economic growth. The population growth rate exceeded the growth rate of energy production in the late 1970's. So the scientists and liberals were right to think overpopulation was a big problem. Now the population growth rate is naturally beginning to fall as a direct result. It will continue to decline until modern industrial civilization very soon undergoes a rapid and total collapse. No other outcome is even possible. Nothing lasts forever. What goes up, must come down. How could it be otherwise?

Ответить
@wizardadmin
@wizardadmin - 30.11.2024 03:24

Question is not "how do we make women have children" but "how do we make women have at least 2 children"
These are quite different questions actually
The right financial incentives for sure can help with the first one, second one is simply incompatible with having a career
I have two brothers and I can assure you that there is pretty much no way to manage 2+ children and have prosperous career, exceptions - yes, common - no
For some reason we focus on eliminating hurdles that come with having children so that women can have careers
Thing is having 2+ children IS career of its own, you just can't succeed in having two careers at once 🤷‍♂

Ответить
@mayy9685
@mayy9685 - 30.11.2024 02:55

Just to see someone else struggle no thanks

Ответить
@avilalovee
@avilalovee - 30.11.2024 01:43

Its not as bad as it seems... We need to let Jesus make the World Peaceful Again 🙌🙏

Ответить
@summereveryday5239
@summereveryday5239 - 30.11.2024 01:32

How will the existence of humanity, the existence of public establishments and the existence of parenthood be able to survive if more couples/women keep choosing not to procreate.

The effects of more couples/women that keep choosing not to procreate could cause the existence of humanity, the existence of public establishments and the existence of parenthood to be at a risk of no longer existing anymore.

The existence of humanity, the existence of public establishments and the existence of parenthood are all very important things for the future because

1. Humans (including women) were created to reproduce in order to keep the human race existing for many years to come.

2. Humans have gotten the chance and ability to create and invent so many unique and useful things ever since the human race began.

3. Public establishments were meant to allow humans to have access to them and were only meant to be operating in an environment where humans are around.

4. Parenthood was meant to be seen and created as something that is beautiful, delightful, rewarding, important, fulfilling and meaningful for a married couple to choose to experience.

Since the existence of public establishments are included, Here are different types of public establishments that could be affected which are

1. How places of business (like jobs, companies, corporations, and manufacturers) could be at a risk of no longer existing anymore if the amount of new people that choose to apply for jobs at businesses, companies, corporations and manufacturers and the amount of new people that buy items from manufacturers keeps decreasing because of more couples/women choosing not to procreate.

2. How places of education (like schools, universities/colleges and tutoring services) could be at a risk of no longer existing anymore if the amount of new people that choose to apply for jobs as teachers/professors by teaching new students at schools and universities/colleges, the amount of new students that choose to go to universities/colleges and the amount of new children that need to go to schools and tutoring services to get an education keeps decreasing because of more couples/women choosing not to procreate.

3. How places of healthcare (like hospitals, medical centres/clinics, dental clinics and pharmacies) could be at a risk of no longer existing anymore if the amount of new people that choose to apply for jobs as doctors/healthcare workers by recovering new patients at hospitals and medical centres/clinics, the amount of new people that choose to apply for jobs as dentists by recovering new patients at dental clinics and the amount of new people that need to get treatment at hospitals, medical centres/clinics, dental clinics and pharmacies keeps decreasing because of more couples/women choosing not to procreate.

4. How places of retail (like malls, shopping centres/districts, stores and e-commerce retailers) could be at a risk of no longer existing anymore if the amount of new people that choose to visit malls and shopping centres/districts, the amount of new people that choose to shop at stores and retailers in-person and from online and the amount of new people that choose to apply for jobs at stores and for e-commerce retailers keeps decreasing because of more couples/women choosing not to procreate.

5. How places of transportation (like airports, subway/LRT stations, and bus stations) could be at a risk of no longer existing anymore if the amount of new people that need or choose to use airports, subway/LRT stations and bus stations to go their destination keeps decreasing because of more couples/women choosing not to procreate.

6. How places of sports (like recreation/leisure/aquatic centres, gyms, fitness centres, parks and playgrounds) could be at a risk of no longer existing anymore if the amount of new people that need to exercise or choose to spend time at recreation/leisure/aquatic centres, gyms, fitness centres and parks and the amount of new children that go to playgrounds keeps decreasing because of more couples/women choosing not to procreate.

7. How places of tourism (like museums, movie theatres/cinemas, entertainment centres/venues, amusement parks/carnivals and water parks) could be at a risk of no longer existing anymore if the amount of new people that choose to go to museums, movie theatres/cinemas, entertainment centres/venues, amusement parks/carnivals and water parks keeps decreasing because of more couples/women choosing not to procreate.

8. How places of hospitality (like restaurants/food establishments, hotels/resorts, and daycares/childcare facilities) could be at a risk of no longer existing anymore if the amount of new people that choose to dine at restaurants/food establishments, the amount of new people that need or choose to stay at hotels/resorts, and the amount of new children that need to go to daycares/childcare facilities keeps decreasing because of more couples/women choosing not to procreate.

Ответить
@Vednier
@Vednier - 30.11.2024 00:04

This is so much of bullshit in this video, like comparing US food overconsumption with hunger problems in other countries. In general, message is obvious "stop worrying, consume, procreate and make profit", very traditional things.
But speaking realistically, thats is happening is population stabilization. Problems like there will be more eldelry then workers" is solvable, but if resources run out - its over.

Ответить
@Astillion
@Astillion - 29.11.2024 23:29

We have optimized society for short term economic growth. And we have succeeded exceptionally well with growing the economy. While population has grown 8 times since 1800, GDP has grown 100 times! We've certainly gotten a lot of good from this growth, but now we are starting to notice the downsides. Cimate change and population collapse are the main ones. And dealing with both of them at the same time is not going to be fun. But we have to do it.

Ответить
@therebel1375
@therebel1375 - 29.11.2024 22:52

I want kids and a family but cant find a woman worth having children with and its expensive af.

Ответить
@BigRell91
@BigRell91 - 29.11.2024 21:32

Bro slow down I can only take in so much facts b4 overload

Ответить
@TruthLivesNow
@TruthLivesNow - 29.11.2024 21:01

Before starting to watch this, “The Population Bomb,” was exactly what I know really started this stupid Leftist ideas. They put a huge fear, like the movie “Soylent Green,” stating that the population of NY would be 40 million in 2020, the truth is New York’s population is static. This is all like the movie, “Waterworld” as well.

Ответить
@sergiocarmona6567
@sergiocarmona6567 - 29.11.2024 20:54

No it isnt a problem. Robotics will take most human jobs and Ai. this will pay taxes worldwide. And its good for planet we are virus. Nature is bigger than human

Ответить
@c-roy.7825
@c-roy.7825 - 29.11.2024 20:38

Great video 💯.

I’m 29, have a good paying job as a barber with no kids and tbh I rather keep it that way because being one of the only 3 barbers without kids in my barbershop? You hear these other guys complaining about how their lives suck because all their money goes to their family and debts.

You see these other guys on Tik Tok having to work 90 hours a week because they stupidly had like 4 kids. I’m good, only live once and I rather be selfish.

Ответить
@armandoespinoza8463
@armandoespinoza8463 - 29.11.2024 20:14

John 3:16

“For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”

Have a Good Day

Ответить
@ScottFree-GB
@ScottFree-GB - 29.11.2024 19:22

Let it be

Ответить
@simphiwecyprial901
@simphiwecyprial901 - 29.11.2024 19:14

Are they sure these readings are accurate, bm n BD culture is still at all time high😂

Ответить
@LembarHeals
@LembarHeals - 29.11.2024 18:59

I feel like population decrease isnt inherently a bad thing but then I remember that social security programs are a pyramid scheme and will collapse if population doesnt grow

Ответить
@jasonnugent963
@jasonnugent963 - 29.11.2024 18:53

It's a bit amazing (and deeply concerning) to me how the "accelerationist" belief of "we just need a good ol' global collapse!" narrative has taken hold with so many people. It's peak doomerism nonsense. You don't "get better" by hoping for cancer.

Ответить
@RealityInk
@RealityInk - 29.11.2024 18:13

Birth control was not accessible to most people before 1900. Condoms existed yet they were mostly the tool of the cortesan and bordello. Even women in cities had large families its just that the kids died. In fact before 1900 women died primarily from reasons connected to pregnancy. Men had second and third wives not because of divorce its the other wives died.

Ответить
@murrielcrawford2060
@murrielcrawford2060 - 29.11.2024 18:08

While you mentioned it, you didn’t give enough attention to the state of women. Globally I don’t think women want to have children anymore because men put the raising of children and the sacrifices on women so that we need to work and take care of the home. It is too much work so women are saying no to the unpaid labor of motherhood. Until things get more equal in the home, I don’t think things will change.

Ответить
@corgiman101
@corgiman101 - 29.11.2024 18:00

people worry about the population going down and up as if it could never switch directions. Its natural for all species for one reason or another.

Ответить
@Oinkers-r4w
@Oinkers-r4w - 29.11.2024 17:57

White Europeans are 7-9% of the world's population, and there is virtually no White country without mass immigration, we are being g***cided.

Ответить
@corgiman101
@corgiman101 - 29.11.2024 17:47

even if life was chill and everyone made enough money the population was never gonna go up forever. Hilarious that 20 yrs ago everyone thought the problem was wed be extremely overpopulated

Ответить
@jip230
@jip230 - 29.11.2024 17:28

Declining births is the outcome of of a capitalist society. As women become more educated having children is less attractive. Children are expensive and time consuming and there are reliable ways to prevent or end pregnancies. it makes sense from a capitalist perspective to prevent or terminate pregnancies or see children as a luxury good. People also now realize the possibility of having a kid with a disability- when people think of kids they think of healthy happy kids. No one thinks of the kid born with severe autism that will have to be taken care of for life or the kid that is raised well but becomes a deviant later in life or the kid born wired for depression/anxiety whose mental illness will adversely impact their lives

Ответить
@Always1happy
@Always1happy - 29.11.2024 17:23

Childless tax is needed. At least 50% of pay check

Ответить
@testolog
@testolog - 29.11.2024 16:58

What is point, if one nation with oil can genocide other nation, beucase they dont want be a part of "great" empires. While other world say, oh no. U should surrender to them and be executted. Because oil. What is point have a child?

Ответить
@janicewolk6492
@janicewolk6492 - 29.11.2024 16:47

I think the confusing deluge of conflicting data is ignored by women, like me, who "feel" the truth of their lives. It feels catastrophic today. Women no longer have children regardless of the projected future for that child. The very fact of Trump, Musk, Vance and their ilk tell many women that society might be dangerous to that child. So don't have it if you can't protect it. People like Fuentes and his snarling disdain for women which appeals to young men, tell women to stay away from men. This is the result. An attempt to return to the 1950's represents an effort to exploit women again. No thanks, Elon, Nick, Donald et al. You break it, you take it. Happy Thanksgiving.

Ответить
@mr.horse1801
@mr.horse1801 - 29.11.2024 16:37

Ban dating apps

Ответить
@MK-hh1vo
@MK-hh1vo - 29.11.2024 16:25

Is there a video on the countries with stable populations? They'll keep humanity going. The only ones worried about this are leaders of large populations that are shrinking. The less people they have to rule, the less power they have worldwide. Places like North Korea. The chickens aren't breeding and the foxes are worried.

Ответить
@gkossatzgmxde
@gkossatzgmxde - 29.11.2024 16:14

Heard of AI?? then entire labor force argument is moot. during the roman empire 250 million ppl lived on earth and they had plenty of killing going on as well. The world's population may have been at its lowest around 70,000 years ago, when the population of Homo sapiens may have dropped to between 1,000 and 10,000 people. There is no danger of extinction. at least not from diminishing birth rates.

Ответить
@tetee6789
@tetee6789 - 29.11.2024 15:55

Anti natalists rise up ✊

Ответить
@pachomiussinanicus1728
@pachomiussinanicus1728 - 29.11.2024 15:39

Consumerism and ponzi scheme like pension system are the only victims of depopulation😂

Ответить
@DEATHxTHExKIDx1
@DEATHxTHExKIDx1 - 29.11.2024 15:35

Their would have to be a huge societal/cultural shift. People at the bottom would have to be forming to communities/ systems to help each other. On top of already struggling survive every day.

The folks who control finances, housing are not trying to shake up the system and help the folks at the bottom. They'd lose money or be giving it away helping get the population stable.

I could see it happening with a societal collapse where people are just FORCED to work together. "We learn to live together or we're gonna die alone"

Ответить
@blakbanshee
@blakbanshee - 29.11.2024 15:30

Government will spend billions “importing” our replacements, but God forbid we get national childcare. My wife and I paid more for daycare than she made in the three years we needed it. When it was all said and done, she lost her career over the mandate. To say we are pissed is an understatement.

Ответить
@myrvynaquilino1152
@myrvynaquilino1152 - 29.11.2024 15:10

Why people do not want to have children:
1. Money issues
2. Women being too demanding to men
3. Increased divorce rate
4. Real estate extremely high compared to salary

Ответить
@thescarecrow2710
@thescarecrow2710 - 29.11.2024 15:07

The muslims in my neighborhood are having kids....

Ответить
@atlantachrome25
@atlantachrome25 - 29.11.2024 15:06

First things first. Population adjustment not population collapse. The way people live today in the west is in some ways counter to biological nature. The billionaire/ corporation class need people to sell their s*** to. Basically.

Ответить
@kathyhallock2528
@kathyhallock2528 - 29.11.2024 15:05

Corporations aren't worried about a decreased work force their automating everything!

Ответить
@dmatty2373
@dmatty2373 - 29.11.2024 14:52

It's a choice, not a requirement. Think for yourself and do what's right for you. Not having kids was the best choice we ever made.

Ответить
@hospitalsgivingpatientsdan8894
@hospitalsgivingpatientsdan8894 - 29.11.2024 14:49

When JESUS was in our lives our country was reproducing and families were important and we didn’t have as much hedonism and materialism

Ответить
@hospitalsgivingpatientsdan8894
@hospitalsgivingpatientsdan8894 - 29.11.2024 14:47

If you love your country reproduce pass port bros

Ответить
@Dinkhole
@Dinkhole - 29.11.2024 14:30

Famime didnt happen, and we have food surplus BECAUSE of the green revolution, or the third age of agriculture, which relies heavily on fossil fuels. Once they run out, the planet can only sustian 1 billion people with less energy available, and certainly less wild food stocks available. Plus dwindling aquifers, salt water creep and increased crop damage and drought. Shits fucked bro. Dont bring more people into that. We cant out tech this.

Ответить