Intel 9900K - Making AMD Look Good?

Hey guys. We are looking into our power consumption numbers. We run the exact same test every time religiously. We are actually wondering if AIDA changed an algorithm and have reached out accordingly.

Fastest gaming cpu when it hit but it was a bad thing lol.

I hate the temps Im getting on my 9900k...

I love these videos because I copped a new 9900k for $40 and I'm just laughing at you AMD fanboys

Have one and faster than anything I need to run and only gets up to peak at 150 degrees with all cores at 5 gig constantly. Use it for rendering very hi res graphics

Which country is your family from?

Intel i9 isn't a gaming processor, but its too strong that it can play ANY game available. You all tripping. Intel is for professionalism.

the only people that complain about the i9 9900k are people that can't afford it. I am very happy with my 9900k

Lies

Well with this processor if you use Intel optane memory of 32 gb then your computer performance is like a skyrocket. AMD processors may be good but i prefer intel always. Z390 chipset is cool. I personally have 48 GB OF RAM CORSAIR VENGEANCE 16GB 3000MHZ each . Intel optane memory 32 gb. Gigabyte ultra durable motherboard z390, i9 9900k. Seagate 2TB hard drive and other cooling system. Galax GeForce gtx 1660 ti over clock able ddr6 6 gb

imo
Intel production cost is AMD product price

LoL

So why did I just order a i9 9900k for editing and rendering. Should I have gotten a i7 and saved an extra $100 or $200 ???

You don't buy that much power for now for games , you buy it so when its 10 year's old and other CPU's are at 25 fps you can have that extra boost to be above 30-40 fps so it can be playable and not been forced to change the RIG.

I bought the 9900k and 2080ti

Ez don’t worry about nothin

So the only real problem that people have with this processor is the price right? I bought it for 408€ new. If the official price was 450 bucks would anybody be so crazy with it being the best?? Thanks

Also the B450 makes it so that for the motherboard and CPU vs 9900k and Z370 / Z390 is actually half the price.

so what i get from this is icor9 9900 give like extra 5 fps more than icore7 8700 but is a100 dollars more expensive

Can you please test its performance on Ark: Survival Evolved. :)

as with all things, price of 9900k is down substantially now -

Really qt earnings says your full of shit reviewers don't really sell anybody your nobodies that run benchmarks . So as to earn a income. get a real job. no person that understands self builds pays attention to your sells pitches. They build what they can afford. Not what you clowns recommend. Now your reviews of cases that's a good service you in fact are useful in that area.

Well, best money for performance by UserBenchmark is... Xeon5650...
And TOP 10 is most claimed by AMD...
For i9-9900K you need pay ~205$ more that R7 2700X for maybe 20% better performance...
I don't see someone building workstation with i9-9900K no matter how... even TR1950X is better...
For games more sense has i5-9600K and i7-9700K, 6C on CPU is now mid-range gaming.
But even with those... ~100-200$ more for that 10-15% more is a joke for me.

"But at what cost?"

It was amazing that in some benchmarks the cheaper one got such a higher score. I always used Intel, but I would use AMD if I was upgrading my PC. I will do that a few years from now, because in Brazil it's really expensive to buy new parts, let's say how hardware will be developed by then.

What was the peak temperature running Aida64 stress test? Could it even make it 10 minutes at that clock speed?

lol, if Cinebench R15 crashes it is nowhere near stable

Wow, the Titan X sucks at Timespy benchmark

A lot of really low results for the 2700x compared to my experiences with a 2700x on an x470 motherboard. I am running faster ram (3200mhz 14,14,14,30) though. With just auto settings and “precision boost” doing its thing I get a 3dmark timespy cpu score of 9447. Also the Aida 64 photoworxx benchmark a get a score of just over 30,000.

I bought i9 9900k, and I like it

AMD needs some work in gaming, even if it's cheaper, I want to get the max out of my games when it comes to latency and fps. I am getting 6.8 to 8.9 ms frame timing in games, that's EXCELLENT

Best thing about 9900k, it shows how many stupid people there are in gaming. Using 1080p numbers to justify to buy it when gaming at 1440p and 4k....lmao

9700K should've had 16 threads
9900K should've been something like 16 cores 32 threads

6700k is still rocking

AMD CPU itself looks good, but its performance really relies on RAM speed. With an Intel CPU, a RAM of 2400 or 2666 is sufficient. But an AMD, you have to go for a 3200 or even higher RAM speed. 3200 cost a lot more than 2666.

I almost bought an AMD processor, but then my friends on the creative side of things told me that AMD are trash in their world because the cores extra don't get used often for stuff like Maya and that Intel had very reliable core compared to AMD, which they said always have failing cores during things like rendering. Ive heard this now from almost everyone working in a creative field but I never hear this on these review channels. So i wanted to ask the forum and/ or channel- Is this valid from what you know of the two brands?

I own i7 2600K Sandy Bridge and i still doesnt have a problems with it? Do i still wait for next intel generation or RYZEN 3700x 12 cores 24 threads?

I7 8086 k is masterpiece too !

It has excellent single core speed. This is where it beats AMD. Everything else...

To me it never is a question of price performance ratio at the moment but also being future proof and being well off for the next several years. My perspective shifts from past titles and current price to being able to safely enjoy my pc for the next years to come.

Looking for benchmarks showing 9900k and TR 1920x. I believe I've found them :) thank you.

I have the money and I’ll only live ones so I’ll get the 9900k today!

I think I’ll go with a 8700k. running VR with a intel i7 970. Lol

Here in Canada, a 9900k cost as much as a 2700x + motherboard + 2 stick of DDR4.

Waiting for the Ryzen 3000

So, I am a gamer and I currently have the AMD FX-8350 overclocked to 4.6GHZ but I want to buy a new CPU
It will be the AMD Ryzen 9 3850X or the I9-9900K
So I am hyped to see comparisons in 3 to 4 months.

Can I ask you what model of watch do you wear in that video ?

Just built an entire rx2700 system for alittle over the price of the i9900k. Fuck intel

thank you so much i just ordered the i9 9900k :D

AMD are junk. If you are thinking of upgrading your processor after only TWO years, then AMD are absolute junk. I bought a 9900K and motherboard for £750, with the full expectation that it would be good for at least another FIVE years, if not much longer. I still have a 2600K that is good enough, and that is eight years old. Think of this another way, if you bought the first generation Ryzen, and you are thinking of upgrading to the imminent Ryzen refresh, then you will have spent MORE than if you had just bought the 9900K, and for only similar performance. Every argument that you are now throwing at the 9900K, will apply to the second Ryzen that you purchase, but even more so.

This is where Intel's value lies. AMD are always cheaper, but they have no longevity, you pay less upfront, sacrificing any savings that you might make in the long term. With Intel you pay more upfront, but secured in the knowledge, that your purchase will save money in the long term. When you purchase Intel, you purchase for tomorrow, when you purchase AMD, you purchase for today. Unfortunately AMD seem to have lulled people into their false economy. Paying less, but more often, does not make things cheaper.

AMD fans are the most illogical annoying fanboy pieces of shit to ever grace technology. They're the kind of idiots that'll spout whatever "facts" they want to be true, then they'll go hide when someone brings out the REAL FACTS. Fucking morons.

Братан, как у тебя до сих пор наш акцент?

Who will buy 2700X, 8700K or 9900K for 1080p resolution? Would be better do gaming test in 2K and 4K resolution with the same GPU (ex: 1080ti)

no one includes the air cooler or aio, that adds 100 dollars more to the build on top of the 300 premium that you pay for cpu and motherboard of intel