Комментарии:
Well guess who s going to Budapest and who isn't?
ОтветитьWhat is lil baby doin in track bruh
ОтветитьSumner goes last Indoors to Champion Outdoors, not too shabby 😏
ОтветитьThe Texas runner had to cut stride to avoid hitting him and Texas would have won. DQ was correct call.
ОтветитьI love track and ran the 800 for a long time. Big fan of track, but DQ’ing him was such a p*ssy move. It will keep this sport un-watched for years to come
ОтветитьВ Красной майке нарушил правила! Гад такой, хотел обогнать того, в Чëрной майке! Убивать за такое надо! Сразу! На месте!
ОтветитьAh I love when justice is served. Good riddance. 100% had to be DQ’d
ОтветитьHe was going to get passed, it's not even close, but I mean, they could have just given him 2nd lol, the dq makes no sense
ОтветитьGood tactics. Sorry. As long as he didn’t touch him it should be good. He who leads the race controls it.
ОтветитьMashallah😍
ОтветитьHe was disqualified for anyone wondering. That’s what you getting for trying to cheat your way to a victory. 0 honor
Ответитьtrash rule. If you lose, you lose.
ОтветитьI ran D1 and won 14 titles and I'm telling you that due is DQ'd!!!!!!!
ОтветитьNo indoors isn't the test. The test will be outdoors
ОтветитьDirty dirty. Moved over a whole lane and a half then used his arm. The hypoxia was eating his brain I guess. 😅
ОтветитьThat kid from Texas waited patiently and made an excellent run. Good win.
ОтветитьThis move is legit
ОтветитьWeak from Navasky
Ответитьclear dq
Ответитьshould have just took the 8 pts
ОтветитьPerfect thumbnail on the video, shows how Bizimana was pissed off at Anderson for that BS finish.
ОтветитьThis is legal in roller derby, so why should track have "special" overly protective rules?
Ответитьgood that he was disqualified
ОтветитьThey were right to call him on it. But talitha Diggs did the same thing in the finals for 400. Keep it consistent or dont call it.
ОтветитьOh well, he'll represent Jamaica anyway in the Olympics.
ОтветитьNavasky stepped on the gas too soon . he probably was trying to get the record instead of focusing on the win. He will be the one to beat in the outdoor season
ОтветитьIntentional or not, Anderson screwed-up. The dq is accurate. The saddest thing to me is that Anderson had no need to move from Lane 1. He would have won if he kept his head, and stayed in his lane.
ОтветитьI'm amazed at his ability to not let fatigue affect his judgement of the lanes until he was being caught near the end. Absolute beast. I'd never be able to see straight under those conditions.
ОтветитьGood, if he had only gone into lane 2 that’s be one thing, but into lane 3/4 in the span of 20 meters is obviously impressment. There’s a difference between defending your position by slow and gradual push outwards and blatantly cutting someone off. Good DQ, maybe he’ll have learned his lessons
ОтветитьAbsolutely a DQ. That's an Easy Button decision.
ОтветитьWhat a douchebag move to block the Texas runner. Disqualify that loser.
ОтветитьHe clearly impeded the guy about to pass him. He tainted the guy's victory.
ОтветитьNCAA is becoming like world league football (soccer). Diving at the end like the opponent athletes have fouled you.
ОтветитьWas he DQ? Cuz he deserves it.
ОтветитьDIRTY MOVE, and you all know it, unless you are blind, so don't play stupid.
ОтветитьDumbass refs lol
ОтветитьWorld record is 1.40.91
ОтветитьGood on the officials for actually DQing Anderson. 100% deserved.
ОтветитьWould have been nice to see the official results after the DQ. And what happened to Will Sumner? DNF?
ОтветитьIt's only because he's black that the white judges disqualified him,,,, LMFAO
ОтветитьIf he had continued in lane he was in, he would’ve won, he panicked and ran wide to block Yusuf🤷🏻♂️
ОтветитьVery deliberate and he didn’t even HAVE to do it… literally would’ve won and now he’s DQ’d!🤷🏾♂️
ОтветитьGoing to be real knit picky here but it seems to me that the DQ was due to the abrupt run out to lane 3 in the home stretch. Based on the rule cited though, that does not seem to be the case. The rule cited was 7.5-3a which implies that this was not due to the lane drift as 7.5-3b or maybe even 7.5-3c(can't remember which off the top of my head) more explicitly denotes. Based on the cited rule, seems that the implication was the sort of flailing towards the finish was what ultimately DQ'd him. I just find that very strange that this is the cited rule on the results.
ОтветитьSo why was he disqualified but Paul Chelimo was able to win USA's and get an olympic medal by using the same strategy?🤨
ОтветитьThat was completely clean. They didn’t touch and it’s done all the time, smart racing.
ОтветитьThey let Chelimo do it, why not Navasky
ОтветитьI think the front runner would have out right if he’d of just stayed in his lane
ОтветитьThat was not clean.
Ответить