Комментарии:
Do you like the looks of the Smart #1?
ОтветитьI'm a bit older and clearly remember that not so long ago you bought a house for 36K and now you get an Electric Bin on wheels for the same and then there was charging, electricity cost which is a problem for 7-10 years and then these cars scrapped SCAM!.
ОтветитьI thought the idea of going electric was to save the planet, the problem with this car is that it is produced in China that has increased its pollution by 300% this year. Makes no sense UK cuts pollution rates but China increases it , Hypocrisy in the extreme.
ОтветитьCan you do one on the new hyundai ioniq 6
ОтветитьForget EV's they are on their way out. Volkswagen has big issues selling them. And this one is from China. Yuk.
ОтветитьI just don't understand why you need 270hp in a city car that will spend most of its life going 30mph...
ОтветитьI didn't think I would ever want to have a Smart, this is beautiful!
ОтветитьDon't buy it it's Chinese
Ответитьmeh
ОтветитьLeapmotor T03 👈 this model electric car it’s best cheap car my friend ☝️❤️
Ответитьİts weird that the “SMARTest” car you reviewed is a SMART😂
ОтветитьIt looks like ant Asian car…it reminds the GLB but at first look I thought it was a Kia
ОтветитьLike a Tesla done wrong.
ОтветитьI hate foxy bingo, so talking to a fox on my main screen would drive me to murder something lol
ОтветитьNew cars adjust the seat while driving takes just 5 min looking at the screen so safe 😊
Ответитьugly Chinese car...
ОтветитьThe comment on USB sockets in the back surprised me. Almost every quality USB cable I own (I have many) has the original USB connector. IS USB-C now the only standard that should be installed in cars?
Ответитьwhen you use that regen brake, do the brake lights flash? otherwise the drivers behind you won't know that you are braking
ОтветитьForm the thumbnail I thought it was a kia
ОтветитьSeems like a winner; albeit it should have better range for a SMART car - say 300 miles. Then it's a SMART car! Good review - thanks. When does it role out in the USA, if at all?
Ответить£36k for that! I don't think so.
ОтветитьIt’s not a hashtag, it doesn’t tag anything.
Ответитьi thought it was a kia soul for a second-
Ответить🤣
ОтветитьUgly as sin !
Ответитьugly like hell, has nothing to do with the former smart brand Hajek had in mind when he founded it
ОтветитьControls: I bet the split on system was 99% Geely/11% Mercedes-Benz.
ОтветитьThe "old fashioned" USB plug is because it fits the charger end of the cable. The other is USB-C to USB-C also called a sync cable.
ОтветитьBurn all EV's.
ОтветитьLost count of the number of times the driver will have to take his eyes off the road to look at the tablet to change various applications. It seems that the more options you have the less time you have to concentrate on road and traffic. As for that stupid fox, well enough said.
Ответитьthe fox fart deodorization is genius
ОтветитьWhat a china let down. CCP sucks.
ОтветитьChina again. Please God no!
ОтветитьIve driven the brabus version of this smart car
ОтветитьNeed to improve dealership coverage.
I requested a test drive - nearest dealer 40 miles away.
Clearly doable for a one off, but not a welcome trip for services & maintenance.
I have to disagree. It is nasty to look at. Designed by men with small weiners!
ОтветитьNo more Smarts
ОтветитьJust looks like a maybach iwl
ОтветитьLooks like a nice car but 36.000 is a LOT of money!
ОтветитьAnyone thinking carwow is becoming more and more influenced by Chinese car manufacturers?
ОтветитьIt looks like a rip off of the mini countryman
ОтветитьOverpriced, chinese, shitty one-screen-for-all interior tesla style (which is a shit brand), and above all, edgy as fuck. Nope.
ОтветитьEsslingen number plate. Be careful, it might just turn you into a terrible driver...
ОтветитьSad day.
ОтветитьTechnically speaking it's the Octothorp 1
Ответитьyou can really see the chinese influence in the design. Makes it seem very cheap, but its not. Also it's MASSIVE. its a smart car not a Fiesta
ОтветитьWell having a number 1 is to urinate. Luckily they did not call it #2.
Ответить